From /usr/ports/UPDATING
---
20110605:
AFFECTS: users of security/gnutls and any port that depends on it
AUTHOR: no...@freebsd.org
gnutls has been updated to 2.12.6.1 and all shared libraries' versions
have
been bumped. So you need
On 6/15/2011 11:20 AM, spidey wrote:
Good morning.
I have never used Freebsd. For that matter, I have not used Linux since
the early 1990s (1993 to be exact) Anyway...
BTW - I have your logo on my xwindows on the Linux box I am trying to
setup. I think it's great.
OK, so, you haven't
FreeBSD can also run a lot of Linux Applications just fine with the
Linux_Enable=YES added to /etc/rc.conf and, not only that, I've heard
/etc/defaults/rc.conf has it in lower case linux_enable=NO
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote:
On 6/16/2011 11:49 AM, Andy Wodfer wrote:
Hi, I'm running 8.2 REL. Are there any specific things to be aware of
when compiling kernel and making world in 64bit? Required kernel modules
etc?
I sometimes forget that the
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Robert
Sent: 17 June 2011 00:06
To: Chuck Swiger
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: OT: Strange memory reading (hardware)
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:11:22
At 04:12 PM 6/16/2011 -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
Jack L. Stone wrote:
At 12:56 PM 6/16/2011 -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
Jack L. Stone wrote:
snip out a lot
Sorry to return with one more question about upgrading to apache22 from
apache2.
A note of concern was that apache22 changes the path
At 04:12 PM 6/16/2011 -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
Jack L. Stone wrote:
At 12:56 PM 6/16/2011 -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
Jack L. Stone wrote:
snip out a lot
Sorry to return with one more question about upgrading to apache22 from
apache2.
A note of concern was that apache22 changes the path
At 04:12 PM 6/16/2011 -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
Jack L. Stone wrote:
At 12:56 PM 6/16/2011 -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
Jack L. Stone wrote:
snip out a lot
Sorry to return with one more question about upgrading to apache22 from
apache2.
A note of concern was that apache22 changes the path
At 07:26 PM 6/17/2011 -0500, Jack L. Stone wrote:
OUCH! I hipe my last email really didn't go out 3 times. Mail server wasn't
resolving properly, so had tried different ones.
Sorry
(^_^)
Happy trails,
Jack L. Stone
System Admin
Sage-american
___
At 04:12 PM 6/16/2011 -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
Jack L. Stone wrote:
At 12:56 PM 6/16/2011 -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
Jack L. Stone wrote:
snip out a lot
Sorry to return with one more question about upgrading to apache22 from
apache2.
A note of concern was that apache22 changes the path
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:18:53 +0100
Graeme Dargie a...@tangerine-army.co.uk wrote:
Graeme
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
The BIOS if it has shown 4096mb at post in the past would suggest
that it is up to date at least enough to deal with 4gb of ram. I
would say the likely hood of all 4
That would explain the three different quote times in them.
Yes it did, but I'm not concerned.
On Jun 17, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Jack L. Stone wrote:
At 07:26 PM 6/17/2011 -0500, Jack L. Stone wrote:
OUCH! I hipe my last email really didn't go out 3 times. Mail server wasn't
resolving properly,
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 06:14:03AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:35:54 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
I've noticed that your mail user agent is including quoted parties'
email addresses in the quote notification. In the text immediately
following this brief paragraph, for
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 06:59:57AM +0200, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2011-06-17 00:20, Daniel Staal skrev:
--As of June 16, 2011 11:21:34 PM +0400, Peter Vereshagin is alleged
to have said:
(And note that a pure list of facts can't be copyrighted: The phone
book is often an example. It's just a
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 07:22:31AM +0200, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2011-06-17 06:53, Adam Vande More skrev:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Copyright you get without registration and without payment, and one
can't give it up.
Again, registration is pretty important if
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:28:51AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
Registration aids enforcement. Of course, there's always the poor man's
copyright registration approach, where the moment you have something you
would like to protect by copyright, you can seal it up in an envelope and
mail it to
On Jun 17, 2011, at 9:28 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
Where i live no need to register, you get copyright if the stuff
fulfills certain criteria, originality is one.
Registration aids enforcement. Of course, there's always the poor man's
copyright registration approach, where the moment you have
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:57:20AM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jun 17, 2011, at 9:28 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
Where i live no need to register, you get copyright if the stuff
fulfills certain criteria, originality is one.
Registration aids enforcement. Of course, there's always the poor
On Jun 17, 2011, at 10:59 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
Sigh. If you'd ever actually filed a copyright registration or
transfer form, you would discover that one needs to get them notarized.
(Documenting that a certain document was available and signed at a
specific date is what a notary public is
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:48:25AM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jun 17, 2011, at 10:59 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
The poor man's copyright approach is, I believe, less certain and
effective than registration, but if there is a dispute over proper
claim of copyright, anything you can do to
The system in question has its primary NIC on one particular
network and a default route to the gateway on that network and
all of that works fine.
I needed the system to communicate fully on two
different networks so we enabled the second interface card and
it works on that second
The system in question has its primary NIC on one particular
network and a default route to the gateway on that network and
all of that works fine.
I needed the system to communicate fully on two
different networks so we enabled the second interface card and
it works on that second
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:09:30 -0500
Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com wrote:
It's quite simple really, it's another hidden tax - Redistribution
of RAM. You see, even with all the entitlement programs poor
people can't afford more than 512MB of RAM. As you are certainly
aware that's not
On 6/17/2011 7:58 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
FreeBSD can also run a lot of Linux Applications just fine with the
Linux_Enable=YES added to /etc/rc.conf and, not only that, I've heard
/etc/defaults/rc.conf has it in lower caselinux_enable=NO
Yea I know, I'm still awake from yesterday,
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Jun 17 12:22:42 2011
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:03:47 -0500
From: Alex Stangl a...@stangl.us
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: free sco unix
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:28:51AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
Registration aids
Jack L. Stone wrote:
[snip]
A note of concern was that apache22 changes the path to the document root
by inserting ../www/apache22/data
versus the previous ../www/data doc root.
Of course my vhosts and a bunch of other things of importance now reside
within the ../www path. I suppose I
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 05:02:09PM -0500, Robert Bonomi wrote:
OK, time for somebody who really knows about this stuff to wade in.
[snip]
Thanks for much more clearly stating, in much greater detail, exactly
what I was trying to say -- and for adding a bunch of additional detail.
--
Chad
--As of June 17, 2011 5:02:09 PM -0500, Robert Bonomi is alleged to have
said:
4) In the U.S., one can officially register copyright on something up to
SIX MONTHS _after_ first 'publication'.
--As for the rest, it is mine.
Actually, you can register it at any time after it has been
On 6/16/2011 6:47 PM, Polytropon wrote:
There is another important term, but I'm not sure how to
translate it properly. In German, it's Schaffenshoehe,
refering to the level of work you put into creating it.
This finalizes in patent law. To make sure nobody can make
money out of trivial
On 6/17/2011 1:57 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jun 17, 2011, at 9:28 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
You assert this claim as well, but it's not at all clear whether
anything but works created by government employees can be placed in
the public domain.
On 6/17/2011 2:48 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jun 17, 2011, at 10:59 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
Sigh. If you'd ever actually filed a copyright registration or
transfer form, you would discover that one needs to get them notarized.
(Documenting that a certain document was available and signed at a
31 matches
Mail list logo
