On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Albert Shih wrote:
After some time, and read new messages ont this mailing list, I find a
solution.
Deactivate hald
deactivate dbus
Option AutoAddDevices Off
put moused_enable=On in /etc/rc.conf
and
reboot
Is it possible to specify that parts of the ports tree should never be used?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On 8 June 2012 23:06, Gary Aitken free...@dreamchaser.org wrote:
Is it possible to specify that parts of the ports tree should never be used?
yes, but don't do it. the ports tree needs to be complete to be
guaranteed to function.
--
Eitan Adler
___
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 00:06:39 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
Is it possible to specify that parts of the ports tree should never be used?
How do you want to understand by parts and not used?
The easiest way to not use some part of the ports tree is to
remove that part. You can do that by manually
On 8 June 2012 23:21, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 00:06:39 -0600, Gary Aitken wrote:
Is it possible to specify that parts of the ports tree should never be used?
This approach does _not_ work well when using portsnap. From
the portsnap.conf manpage: Note that
hi Bill,
afaik, in your case the packets checked twice against the ipfw-rules - once
for the layer2-filtering part and 2nd time for the ip-filtering part.
1st enable filtering on ethernet demux/eth. output frame:
# sysctl net.link.ether.ipfw=1
then start your fw-script:
# -- sniplet from
Dear FreeBSD Team,
Firstly I would like to say you Big thanks for your really good job and the
best system for us, small IT staff.
Second, I would like to ask you about some problem with FreeBSD source.
I've downloaded .iso Image from this link:
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Denis Guzanov guzanov...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear FreeBSD Team,
Firstly I would like to say you Big thanks for your really good job and the
best system for us, small IT staff.
Second, I would like to ask you about some problem with FreeBSD source.
I've
I reconfigured my ssd filesystem with the /var partition of size 512M.
Unfortunately, something in portsnap or the ports tree in general uses a
boatload of small files, and i ran out of inodes. Can anyone recommend an
appropriate size for the newfs -i value? 1024? less?
Thanks,
Gary
Thanks very much,
According to your description , I changed my firewall settings ,
(
Because I already tried add the via em0 or via em1, it's not working,
so I remove it ,
my FreeBSD is WAN is em0 ,LAN is em1
)
and made it like this below
and I still cannot download things through it , and i
http://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/31801/what-is-in-wired-memory
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 09:21:35AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
top reports wired memory 128MB
WHERE it is used? below results of vmstat -m and vmstat -z
values does not sum up even to half of it
FreeBSD 9 - few days
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Gary Aitken free...@dreamchaser.org wrote:
I reconfigured my ssd filesystem with the /var partition of size 512M.
Unfortunately, something in portsnap or the ports tree in general uses a
boatload of small files, and i ran out of inodes. Can anyone recommend
FreeBSD 9 on x86_64.
I am in the process of doing a portupgrade on libreoffice (from 3.4.4 to
3.5.2.5). During the build it has (so far) errored out 4 times, in the
following modules:
vcl
framework
sfx2
tail_build
Each time, it told me to go into the subdirectory, do a gmake clean and a
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 11:42:37PM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 6 Jun 2012, at 21:52, Dave U. Random anonym...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net
wrote:
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:47:11 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Having to pay Verisign instead of
On 09/06/12 at 04:41P, Walter Hurry wrote:
FreeBSD 9 on x86_64.
I am in the process of doing a portupgrade on libreoffice (from 3.4.4 to
3.5.2.5). During the build it has (so far) errored out 4 times, in the
following modules:
vcl
framework
sfx2
tail_build
Each time, it told me to go
Gary Aitken wrote:
Is it possible to specify that parts of the ports tree should never be used?
Yes.
Although as others pointed out it depend quite what you mean by that :-)
Example
setenv DUDS SomeEndPortToSkip_eg_ghostview
One could also do
setenv DUDS `printenv DUDS`
Hi,
Reference:
From: Denis Guzanov guzanov...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 15:45:54 +0400
Message-id:
CAMUH=P1HGivtRUsgSz9_XYt-wLBh-8cFvq=i5fs6hn1ittk...@mail.gmail.com
Denis Guzanov wrote:
Dear FreeBSD Team,
Firstly I would like to say you Big thanks for your
On 06/09/12 00:58, Warren Block wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jun 2012, Robert Huff wrote:
Ronald F. Guilmette writes:
I got a lot of disks here, so that part is not a problem. I just
need to make sure that I'm gonna do this the Right Way[tm].
(I've already been making my own ham-fisted disk-to-disk
Jim Nasby j...@nasby.net writes:
I keep getting this error when trying to update source on 8.1:
TreeList failed: Error in /var/db/sup/src-all/checkouts.cvs:RELENG_8_1:
13890: Could not parse status record. Delete it and try again.
Have you tried deleting
On 6/9/12 2:43 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Jim Nasbyj...@nasby.net writes:
I keep getting this error when trying to update source on 8.1:
TreeList failed: Error in /var/db/sup/src-all/checkouts.cvs:RELENG_8_1:
13890: Could not parse status record. Delete it and try again.
Have you tried
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 05:58:25 +0200, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2012-06-09 00:10, Walter Hurry skrev:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 20:58:49 +0200, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2012-06-08 17:51, Walter Hurry skrev:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 15:39:22 +, Walter Hurry wrote:
Never mind: Stupid moi. The answer was
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 18:12:25 +0100, Dave Morgan wrote:
On 09/06/12 at 04:41P, Walter Hurry wrote:
FreeBSD 9 on x86_64.
I am in the process of doing a portupgrade on libreoffice (from 3.4.4
to 3.5.2.5). During the build it has (so far) errored out 4 times, in
the following modules:
vcl
'tperimeter' Version 1.113 is released and available at:
http://www.tundraware.com/Software/tperimeter/
The last public release was 1.112
What's New
--
Changed the wrapper file rebuild logic to delete outstanding access
requests independently of how often the script is run (either
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 07:22:50 -0600
Gary Aitken wrote:
I reconfigured my ssd filesystem with the /var partition of size
512M. Unfortunately, something in portsnap or the ports tree in
general uses a boatload of small files, and i ran out of inodes. Can
anyone recommend an appropriate size
On 9 June 2012 18:38, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 07:22:50 -0600
Gary Aitken wrote:
I reconfigured my ssd filesystem with the /var partition of size
512M. Unfortunately, something in portsnap or the ports tree in
general uses a boatload of small files, and i ran
On 9 Jun 2012, at 18:48, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 11:42:37PM +0200, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 6 Jun 2012, at 21:52, Dave U. Random anonym...@anonymitaet-im-inter.net
wrote:
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:47:11 +0100,
In message 4fd38b9a.4010...@qeng-ho.org,
Arthur Chance free...@qeng-ho.org wrote:
There's a BFI (brute force and ignorance) way of doing it in the base
system - dd. Provided your system disk is quiescent (ideally when
running from a live CD or all partitions mounted read-only, otherwise
pray
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Also, I don't like backups taking longer than absolutely necessary, and
this is why I am specifically _not_ attracted to either the dd solution
or to dump/restore, because as I understand it, with either of these methods
you end up copying perhaps
I have just have built and installed Chromium 19.0.1084.52 from the
ports on my amd64 machine - 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Sat Nov 5
08:40:03 NZDT 2011
Portversion chromium-19.0.1084.52_2 = up-to-date with port
On web sites which contains graphics Chromium crashes with the
Hello,
Looks like you have missed out something related to ATA in the kernel
configuration file. Can you post your complete kernel config?
Thanks
Subhro
--
Subhro Sankha Kar
System Administrator
Working and playing with FreeBSD since 2002
On 20-May-2012, at 5:53 PM, C. P. Ghost wrote:
Hello,
It looks like you have hit a documented bug. See this:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=125447
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=revrevision=141116
Did you try upgrading your ports?
Thanks
Subhro
--
Subhro Sankha Kar
System Administrator
Working and Playing
On 10-Jun-2012, at 6:13 AM, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 June 2012 18:38, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 07:22:50 -0600
Gary Aitken wrote:
I reconfigured my ssd filesystem with the /var partition of size
512M. Unfortunately, something in portsnap or the ports
32 matches
Mail list logo
