Hi,
I'm using Skype 2.1.0.81 in 10-CURRENT. Recently I have added Virtual
... to the Display SubSection in my /etc/X11/xorg.conf:
Section Screen
Identifier Screen0
Device Card0
MonitorMonitor0
SubSection Display
Viewport 0 0
On 2012.11.18 09:58, Gary Kline wrote:
I probably should cc the hardward guys about this. first, see if it
geta any traction here, tho. my tech guy got me a Delll 3010
that has an improved [[meaning screwed up]] BIOS with some
hardware mess called the UEFI.
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:49:46 +0100, Lucas B. Cohen wrote:
On 2012.11.18 09:58, Gary Kline wrote:
I probably should cc the hardward guys about this. first, see if it
geta any traction here, tho. my tech guy got me a Delll 3010
that has an improved [[meaning screwed up]]
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:43:06 +0100
Polytropon articulated:
Allow me to provide just one example:
More in the series of bizarre UEFI bugs
http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/20187.html
That doesn't appear to be a bug. It appears that the code is doing
exactly what the designer wanted it
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 06:00:29 -0500, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:43:06 +0100
Polytropon articulated:
Allow me to provide just one example:
More in the series of bizarre UEFI bugs
http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/20187.html
That doesn't appear to be a bug. It appears that
per...@pluto.rain.com (Perry Hutchison) writes:
Bernt Hansson b...@bananmonarki.se wrote:
On 2012-11-17 21:36, Gary Aitken wrote:
# portmaster -n emulators/wine-fbsd64
=== No /usr/ports/emulators/wine-fbsd64 exists, and no information
=== about emulators/wine-fbsd64 can be found in
19.11.2012 14:34, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 17/11/2012 22:48, Chris Rees wrote:
(and is GPL btw)
Since we're discussing it, Mercurial is BSDL-ed, and apparently has
proper crypto signing using GPG:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 17/11/2012 22:48, Chris Rees wrote:
(and is GPL btw)
Since we're discussing it, Mercurial is BSDL-ed, and apparently has
proper crypto signing using GPG:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Hexing hexhex...@gmail.com wrote:
per...@pluto.rain.com (Perry Hutchison) writes:
Bernt Hansson b...@bananmonarki.se wrote:
On 2012-11-17 21:36, Gary Aitken wrote:
# portmaster -n emulators/wine-fbsd64
=== No /usr/ports/emulators/wine-fbsd64 exists, and
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 06:00:29 -0500, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:43:06 +0100
Polytropon articulated:
Allow me to provide just one example:
More in the series of bizarre UEFI bugs
http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/20187.html
That
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko c.kw...@gmail.com wrote:
19.11.2012 14:34, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 17/11/2012 22:48, Chris Rees wrote:
(and is GPL btw)
Since we're discussing it, Mercurial is BSDL-ed, and apparently has
proper crypto signing using GPG:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:10 AM, C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko c.kw...@gmail.com
wrote:
19.11.2012 14:34, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 17/11/2012 22:48, Chris Rees wrote:
(and is GPL btw)
Since we're discussing it, Mercurial is
any
19.11.2012 15:03, C. P. Ghost wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Hexing hexhex...@gmail.com wrote:
per...@pluto.rain.com (Perry Hutchison) writes:
Bernt Hansson b...@bananmonarki.se wrote:
On 2012-11-17 21:36, Gary Aitken wrote:
# portmaster -n emulators/wine-fbsd64
=== No
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Daniel Feenberg feenb...@nber.org wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 06:00:29 -0500, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:43:06 +0100
Polytropon articulated:
Allow me to provide just one example:
More in the
In the last episode (Nov 18), Thomas Mueller said:
What is the (Free)BSD counterpart of conv=fsync in dd command?
Command in question is
dd if=GNOME-3.6.0.iso of=/dev/DRIVE bs=8M conv=fsync
This is for writing to a USB stick, and of course DRIVE is replaced by the
actual device node;
http://www.fossil-scm.org/
I'm not fossil user, but it's BSD licensed in written in C.
Baptise Daroussin probably could tell us more about fossil pro and cons.
--
Regards,
Alexander Yerenkow
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 2012-11-19 07:42, Thomas Mueller wrote:
In the last episode (Nov 18), Thomas Mueller said:
What is the (Free)BSD counterpart of conv=fsync in dd command?
Command in question is
dd if=GNOME-3.6.0.iso of=/dev/DRIVE bs=8M conv=fsync
This is for writing to a USB stick, and of course
Hi,
have i caught portsnap with its pants down ?
# rm -rf /usr/ports
# portsnap fetch update
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 6 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from ec2-eu-west-1.portsnap.freebsd.org... done.
Fetching snapshot metadata... done.
Updating from Sun Nov 11 15:54:03 CET
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Daniel Feenberg feenb...@nber.org wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 06:00:29 -0500, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:43:06 +0100
Polytropon articulated:
Allow me
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:21:19 + (UTC)
jb wrote:
Hi,
have i caught portsnap with its pants down ?
# rm -rf /usr/ports
# portsnap fetch update
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 6 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from ec2-eu-west-1.portsnap.freebsd.org... done.
Fetching
RW rwmaillists at googlemail.com writes:
...
...
So, why did it do so much work (ca. 5 min, 24085 patches), even
claiming to have applied patches, before telling me the env was not
properly set up ? jb
You gave portsnap two commands - one succeeded and the other failed.
fetch
C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws writes:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Hexing hexhex...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess that just remove it and install /usr/ports/emulators/wine or
/usr/ports/emulators/wine-devel would be OK.
Nope, not for amd64:
% grep 'ONLY_FOR_ARCHS'
hmmm... I used -R when doing a dump, and I see the dump date is
recorded as 1969. Does that mean an incremental dump will dump
the whole thing again?
on a related note, if dumping to a file and not a linear media such
as physical tape, is there any real reason to use -r or -R?
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Hexing hexhex...@gmail.com wrote:
C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws writes:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Hexing hexhex...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess that just remove it and install /usr/ports/emulators/wine or
/usr/ports/emulators/wine-devel would be OK.
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:10:48 + (UTC)
jb wrote:
You gave portsnap two commands - one succeeded and the other failed.
fetch downloads and applies patches to the compressed
snapshot. update uses the compressed snapshot to update a
pre-existing ports tree created by an extract
...
ajtiM wrote:
On Sunday 18 November 2012 12:57:14 Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Sunday, November 18, 2012 a las 12:45:54PM -0600, ajtiM escribió:
When using Skype on FreeBSD (.1-RC3, the call often (every 1-5 minutes)
gets disconnected or better I hear but the other side doesn't hear me
If I
2012/11/18 Shane Ambler free...@shaneware.biz:
On 18/11/2012 06:49, Snow Mountains wrote:
Could you recommend a reliable document on how to do a correct block
alignment for new FreeBSD 9 install? FreeBSD Handbook doesn't
mention this at all, although I can find a lot of (not quite
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Snow Mountains wrote:
2012/11/18 Shane Ambler free...@shaneware.biz:
On 18/11/2012 06:49, Snow Mountains wrote:
Could you recommend a reliable document on how to do a correct block
alignment for new FreeBSD 9 install? FreeBSD Handbook doesn't
mention this at all,
I know this doesn't belong here; however I was hoping someone could
give me a quick answer.
I have a document I am writing, actually a new set of By Laws for an
organization. The format should be as shown here:
Article I
Name
Bla-bla
section 1
section 2
RW rwmaillists at googlemail.com writes:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:10:48 + (UTC)
jb wrote:
You gave portsnap two commands - one succeeded and the other failed.
Nope. I gave ONE command: 'portsnap fetch update'.
But this looks like a flaky entry validation - it should be rejected
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:07:44 -0500
Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
Snip ...
So how can I run rpd on the freebsd host running the virtualbox
server system so I can access the configured vm? I this
configuration even possible?
I'll give it one last shot.
CREATE/RUNNING ACCESSING !
20.11.2012 00:02, Carmel пишет:
I know this doesn't belong here; however I was hoping someone could
give me a quick answer.
I have a document I am writing, actually a new set of By Laws for an
organization. The format should be as shown here:
Article I
Name
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:18:32PM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 06:00:29 -0500, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:43:06 +0100
Polytropon articulated:
Allow me to provide just one example:
More in the series of bizarre UEFI bugs
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Nov 19 14:15:23 2012
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: jb jb.1234a...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: portsnap
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 20:13:45 + (UTC)
RW rwmaillists at googlemail.com writes:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:10:48 + (UTC) jb
Latex can do what you describe but you would need to create or locate a
different document class. The standard classes that ship with (most)
versions of Latex are for academic journals, books, and letters. You are
more likely to get your question answered on a Latex specific forum or
mailing list.
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 01:08:47 +0400
Boris Samorodov articulated:
20.11.2012 00:02, Carmel пишет:
I know this doesn't belong here; however I was hoping someone could
give me a quick answer.
I have a document I am writing, actually a new set of By Laws for an
organization. The format
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 10:30:44AM -0500, Daniel Feenberg wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Daniel Feenberg feenb...@nber.org wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 06:00:29 -0500, Jerry wrote:
19.11.2012, 23:27, Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 01:08:47 +0400
Boris Samorodov articulated:
20.11.2012 00:02, Carmel пишет:
I know this doesn't belong here; however I was hoping someone could
give me a quick answer.
I have a document I am writing, actually a new
This sort of worked for me, but still had problems. 1) my Latex starts
chapters on a new page, which may or may not fit the bill. 2) In Lyx the
chapter command wants a title; I could not get just Article I. I'm sure
both of these are fixable, Latex can do virtually anything.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012
20.11.2012 01:25, Carmel пишет:
I couldn't find any documentation on it either,
although I was certain that it could be done.
If you are going to use LaTeX, you definitely should learn it.
There are many good free downlodable books out there.
I am surprised that there
is not a fixed style
20.11.2012 01:48, Open Slate пишет:
This sort of worked for me, but still had problems. 1) my Latex starts
chapters on a new page, which may or may not fit the bill.
1. Don't use the book style to write an article.
2. Read the documentation. It's open, free and plenty.
2) In Lyx the
chapter
Robert Bonomi bonomi at mail.r-bonomi.com writes:
From owner-freebsd-questions at freebsd.org Mon Nov 19 14:15:23 2012
To: freebsd-questions at freebsd.org
From: jb jb.1234abcd at gmail.com
Subject: Re: portsnap
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 20:13:45 + (UTC)
RW rwmaillists at
2012/11/19 Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012, Snow Mountains wrote:
2012/11/18 Shane Ambler free...@shaneware.biz:
On 18/11/2012 06:49, Snow Mountains wrote:
Could you recommend a reliable document on how to do a correct block
alignment for new FreeBSD 9 install? FreeBSD
Good afternoon,
We're looking to build a ZFS storage device with FreeBSD version 8.3, however,
the Supermicro based hardware comes with LSI 2008 SAS controller card and we
were told that LSI / Supermicro doesn't have a driver for FreeBSD. We're just
wondering if the LSI 2008 is supported
I'm using /usr/sbin/ppp for PPPoE over an ADSL modem in bridged mode:
# ifconfig tun0
tun0: flags=8051UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1492
options=8LINKSTATE
inet 203.217.27.170 -- 203.215.15.252 netmask 0x
inet 203.214.46.107 -- 203.215.7.251
On Tue 2012-11-20 11:49:38 UTC+1100, andrew clarke (m...@ozzmosis.com) wrote:
In the meantime I've switched to using mpd5 (/usr/ports/net/mpd5) and
/sbin/ipnat. So far, so good:
# ifconfig ng0
ng0: flags=88d1UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu
1492
inet
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Snow Mountains wrote:
Just one small problem. Here I got this:
# gpart create -s bsd ada2s1
gpart: geom 'ada2s1': File exists
# gpart set -a active -i 1 ada2s1
gpart: index '1': No such file or directory
Expected? Anyway, is it any way to but FreeBSD on something like s2?
On Mon, 2012-11-19 at 16:41 -0800, Alltek Supplies Tech Support/Customer
Service wrote:
Good afternoon,
We're looking to build a ZFS storage device with FreeBSD version 8.3,
however, the Supermicro based hardware comes with LSI 2008 SAS
controller card and we were told that LSI / Supermicro
2012/11/20 Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Snow Mountains wrote:
Just one small problem. Here I got this:
# gpart create -s bsd ada2s1
gpart: geom 'ada2s1': File exists
# gpart set -a active -i 1 ada2s1
gpart: index '1': No such file or directory
Expected? Anyway,
Hi,
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:49:39 +1100
andrew clarke m...@ozzmosis.com wrote:
I'm using /usr/sbin/ppp for PPPoE over an ADSL modem in bridged mode:
# ifconfig tun0
tun0: flags=8051UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1492
options=8LINKSTATE
inet 203.217.27.170
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Snow Mountains wrote:
2012/11/20 Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Snow Mountains wrote:
Just one small problem. Here I got this:
# gpart create -s bsd ada2s1
gpart: geom 'ada2s1': File exists
# gpart set -a active -i 1 ada2s1
gpart: index '1': No
2012/11/20 Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com:
I know I've seen that, but can't recall what causes it. You can try
retasting before creating the BSD partitions:
# true /dev/ada2
# gpart create -s bsd ada2s2
Sorry, no difference:
# gpart show ada2
= 63 468862065 ada2 MBR (223G)
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:48:01 -1000
Open Slate articulated:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Boris Samorodov b...@passap.ru
wrote:
20.11.2012 00:02, Carmel пишет:
I know this doesn't belong here; however I was hoping someone
could give me a quick answer.
I have a document I
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:07:44 -0500
Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
Snip ...
So how can I run rpd on the freebsd host running the virtualbox
server system so I can access the configured vm? I this
configuration even
From: jb jb.1234a...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: portsnap
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 22:05:41 + (UTC)
Robert Bonomi bonomi at mail.r-bonomi.com writes:
From owner-freebsd-questions at freebsd.org Mon Nov 19 14:15:23
2012 To: freebsd-questions at freebsd.org From: jb jb.1234abcd
at
On Mon 2012-11-19 07:55:16 UTC-0500, Daniel Feenberg (feenb...@nber.org) wrote:
The only way for FreeBSD (or Linux, for that matter) to survive in a
world where hardware vendors care only about Windows, is to make sure
that FreeBSD only depends upon features that Windows uses.
In a world
Issue solved; I forgot to edit .xinitrc.
Cheers,
Hooman
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:28:13 +, Hooman Oroojeni wrote:
Dear All,
I would like to use GUI in Freebsd 9, but I face with following error.
Any idea to help is
There's a git repository. It's public. You can look at what goes into
the FreeBSD git clone to get your assurance that things aren't being
snuck in. People are using it, right now.
I've always been confused by this. Which source repo is the true source
of truth?
To obtain the FreeBSD source,
http://www.fossil-scm.org/
I'm not fossil user, but it's BSD licensed in written in C.
Baptise Daroussin probably could tell us more about fossil pro and cons.
This misses one of of the main points raised in the original post. The
proliferation of git as a revision control system.
Also,
On 19 November 2012 22:04, Zach Leslie xaque...@gmail.com wrote:
I've always been confused by this. Which source repo is the true source
of truth?
This changed a few months ago when ports and doc switched.
As of now:
- SVN is *the* source of truth.
- CVS is exported from svn. It will
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:02:51 -0500, Carmel wrote:
I know this doesn't belong here; however I was hoping someone could
give me a quick answer.
I have a document I am writing, actually a new set of By Laws for an
organization. The format should be as shown here:
Article I
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:27:52 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
answer me this, daniel or anybody else:: isn't there a very small
group who is devoted to creating a 100% open/free hardware and
software? maybe 64-bit only to start? most of us who are still
alive and contributing
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 07:46:45AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:27:52 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
answer me this, daniel or anybody else:: isn't there a very small
group who is devoted to creating a 100% open/free hardware and
software? maybe 64-bit only to
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 23:35:15 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 07:46:45AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:27:52 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
answer me this, daniel or anybody else:: isn't there a very small
group who is devoted to creating a 100% open/free
64 matches
Mail list logo
