Hi guys! :)
I put in .cshrc:
setenv PACKAGESITE
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9-stable/Latest;
and afterwards #pkg_add -r pkg to use pkg
But currently i can not use pkg :(, but i remember that few days ago i
was using I used pkg to update and install some binary package,
Sorry I have to say that, but I feel I have to comment on this:
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:46:53 -0400, Quartz wrote:
[pc/free]bsd *can* be used as a desktop system, but it's really aimed
more at servers...
FreeBSD is, per definition, a multi-purpose operating system.
It can be used on servers,
Dear Purchasing Manager,
Glad to hear that you're in the market for wiper blades .
We specialized in producing wiper blades for several years ,and hope to
cooperate with you .
More products details as follows:
1.Multifunctional wiper blades with eight new adaptors with special patented
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Jeff Belyea jbely...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a new computer with windows 8, which I hate with a passion. I don't
play music and I don't do a lot of pictures. Basically I only search, some
EBay and games. Can I replace win8 with BSD?
Of course you can. I
(While the system involved is -CURRENT, this doesn't seem to
have anything CURRENT-related.)
On a system running:
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Sun Dec 30 12:52:09 EST 2012 amd64
running dump causes the system to lock up ... sometimes.
Specifics:
I have a
I have 5 XP machines on my node that are used to crunch data 24/7. So,
I'm looking for an OS platform that has a 10 year EOL to replace XP/3.
What I got from your website appears to be a year or two at most on
freebsd 8.3, and we really don't want to repeat the travails of the
transition from
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:19:02 -0600, David Thurber wrote:
I have 5 XP machines on my node that are used to crunch data 24/7. So,
I'm looking for an OS platform that has a 10 year EOL to replace XP/3.
It's good you're paying attention to the upcoming death
of Windows XP and the expected birth of
On 29/03/2013 15:19, David Thurber wrote:
I have 5 XP machines on my node that are used to crunch data 24/7. So,
I'm looking for an OS platform that has a 10 year EOL to replace XP/3.
What I got from your website appears to be a year or two at most on
freebsd 8.3, and we really don't want to
On Mar 28, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Laszlo Danielisz wrote:
If I'm sharing an external 1TB HDD with FreeBSD and OS-X (I wan to use Time
Machine), what is the best file system to use?
Time Machine is only supported on top of journaled HFS+; I'm not sure how
fusefs-hfs is doing on FreeBSD, though. Or
Please help debug sendmail / smtp.gmail config.
My University just switched to gmail (dickheads)
and I'm trying to figure out how to set it up.
It used to work ok with the University smtp auth
server. Now I get in /var/log/maillog:
sm-mta[72300]: r2TI0vQc072134: to=me...@bris.ac.uk,
gmail has blocking mechanism when you use it from different devices,
try this maybe it will help:
https://accounts.google.com/DisplayUnlockCaptcha
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE on amd64
This afternoon I upgraded textproc/libxml2 from version 2.7.8_5 to
version 2.7.8_0 (at least I think it's libxml2 that's the problem - I
upgraded py27-libxml2 and gdk-pixbuf2 at the same time).
Then x11-toolkits/gtksourceview2 would not compile. I got the following
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 18:32:34 GMT
Anton Shterenlikht articulated:
Please help debug sendmail / smtp.gmail config.
My University just switched to gmail (dickheads)
and I'm trying to figure out how to set it up.
It used to work ok with the University smtp auth
server. Now I get in
On 29 March 2013 15:11, Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com wrote:
FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE on amd64
This afternoon I upgraded textproc/libxml2 from version 2.7.8_5 to
version 2.7.8_0 (at least I think it's libxml2 that's the problem - I
upgraded py27-libxml2 and gdk-pixbuf2 at the same time).
I seem to have to run 'make index' in /usr/ports after I've run 'svn up
/usr/ports' in order to see which ports need to be updated using
'portversion'. This doesn't seem correct...and if so portsnap would
seem like a much better tool. Perhaps I should be running 'make
fetchindex' instead? I'm
On 29 March 2013 18:06, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
On Mar 28, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Laszlo Danielisz wrote:
If I'm sharing an external 1TB HDD with FreeBSD and OS-X (I wan to use
Time Machine), what is the best file system to use?
Time Machine is only supported on top of journaled
Hi--
On Mar 29, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 29 March 2013 18:06, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
Time Machine is only supported on top of journaled HFS+; I'm not sure how
fusefs-hfs is doing on FreeBSD, though. Or you could setup multiple
partitions and have an exFAT
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Steve O'Hara-Smith st...@sohara.orgwrote:
There are several free public USENET text servers (no binary
groups), granted it's nothing like the days when every ISP ran one but
there are still several about (eternal-september.com is one of the
biggest).
Hi,
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 09:19:02 -0600
David Thurber dav...@thurber.org wrote:
I have 5 XP machines on my node that are used to crunch data 24/7.
So, I'm looking for an OS platform that has a 10 year EOL to replace
XP/3.
if you do not count the service packs and updates, your XP
On 30/03/2013 09:43, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi--
On Mar 29, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 29 March 2013 18:06, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
Time Machine is only supported on top of journaled HFS+; I'm not
sure how fusefs-hfs is doing on FreeBSD, though. Or you could
setup
On 30 March 2013 02:14, Shane Ambler free...@shaneware.biz wrote:
On 30/03/2013 09:43, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi--
On Mar 29, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 29 March 2013 18:06, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
Time Machine is only supported on top of journaled HFS+; I'm not
On 29 March 2013 22:29, Andre Goree an...@drenet.info wrote:
I seem to have to run 'make index' in /usr/ports after I've run 'svn up
/usr/ports' in order to see which ports need to be updated using
'portversion'. This doesn't seem correct...and if so portsnap would
seem like a much better
Personally I'm using FreeBSD _exclusively_ (!) on the desktop
since version 4.0, and I haven't missed _any_ common desktopy
thing that is required for my daily work.
I was referring to general intent when I wrote that. For example, bsd
has poor support for things like
Thank you Chuck!
I've tried fusefs-hfs a couple months ago and wasn't working very well.
So yeah, I might create some DOS partition to be shared.
Regards,
Laszlo
--
Laszlo Danielisz
On 2013 March 29 Friday at 6:06 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Mar 28, 2013, at 2:10 PM, Laszlo Danielisz
When I do portsnap update and try building stuff, I get errors like this:
Mk/bsd.port.mk, line 5: warning: You are using a ports file that originated
from CVS!!
Mk/bsd.port.mk, line 6: warning: The FreeBSD project has switched from CVS to
SubVersion.
Mk/bsd.port.mk, line 7: warning: This CVS
25 matches
Mail list logo
