Jiri Novak wrote:
and I have noticed that lots of ports fail to build because of
internal compiler error from GCC...
Does the error always occur in the same place? If not, then it is
possible you have a hardware fault.
A segmentation fault results from bad memory access, which could be a
Christopher Nehren wrote:
On 2005-03-23, Alex Zbyslaw scribbled these
curious markings:
% find /usr/ports -type f -name pkg-plist -exec egrep -H epstopdf {} \;
Just a bit of nitpickery: I've found that piping the output to xargs
rather than using find's exec produces faster results. Plus
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
Is it possible to find out which port has a particular
executable/script file ? It took me some time to find
out if the script epstopdf was in latex or tex or tetex!
Any easy way to do this ?
Here is an example:
pkg_info -W /usr/X11R6/bin/nedit
/usr/X11R6/bin/nedit
JP wrote:
I need some help trying to locate or how to obtain/build a file named mkhomedir.so this file is needed to create home directories after logging in successfully though winbind. I am running FreeBSD 5.3 Release, and Samba 3.
% locate mkhome
darren wrote:
order hosts,bind
multi on
Glad you got it fixed.
Where did you find this config documented?
My 4.10 hosts.conf man page doesn't mention anything like this (and 5.3
seems to have lost the file altogether -- at least there was no man page
for it).
--Alex, curious
Charles Swiger wrote:
Actually, if the compile crashes out at different points, that's
almost a sure sign of a hardware issue, most probably overheating. If
you were just running the system as a network router before, that
involves so little load that you wouldn't stress anything, but
Gary Smithe wrote:
If that is your resolv.conf, then that explains some things. Your box
is looking at the ISP for name resolution and the ISP has no idea (nor
could care) what your internal LAN address space is. Change the
resolv.conf to look at itself (127.0.0.1) and setup BIND with some
Ludo Koren wrote:
It doesn't help either... The result is the same.
Just to check I'm understanding your problem correctly -- you're
expecting to write much more data to the tape than is actually being
written.
If that's correct, then there's a couple things I can think of:
1) Your tape
Ludo Koren wrote:
# /sbin/dump -Lu0 -B 41943040 -C 32 -f /dev/sa0 /usr
I would guess that your tape drive does hardware compression in which
case the amount of data which fits on a tape is variable. In such a
case you can't tell dump how big the tape is -- I haven't used options
like -B
:
The default xserver is now xorg. Other than that do you have any
CFLAGS or CXXFLAGS set you shouldn't. From my experience you should
not use any, especially -f*.
On 03/04/05 07:52:39, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
I installed the latest thunderbird port (1.01) to see how it
compared to Mozilla Mail
I installed the latest thunderbird port (1.01) to see how it compared to
Mozilla Mail. So far I have had three bus errors and a segmentation
fault! SO far I haven't even been able to reply to an email. Needless
to say, Mozilla Mail does not have this level of problems for me.
I imported all
When I try from to mount ntfs partition via commands: mount_ntfs
/dev/ad0s1 / mnt or mount -t ntfs /dev/ad0s1 /mnt I get a messege:
mount_ntfs: vfsload(ntfs): File exists
What does this mean, and what i'll do next? How I can to get access to
NTFS partition my hard drive?
It's a while since I
Jerry McAllister wrote:
The last part of the name you
are adding are slices which are what FBSD uses to divide up a partition.
They are not relevant to NTFS.
Just a little side terminology snit here. The 'e' refers to a _partition_
which FreeBSD uses to divide up _slices_ 's1' rather than the
Mike wrote:
# ifconfig -a
ed0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.40 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
# ifconfig ed0 alias 192.168.1.41 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast
192.168.1.255
ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists
[using same
Micheal Patterson wrote:
Whereas what I'm doing Private LAN Keep-State NAT World is not secure
and would not be accepted by a security professional? How do you figure
that either method is more or less secure than the other? If stateful is
breached in either method, the underlying network is
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Mark wrote:
But what causes them ? I get them too.
I believe CISCO routers do this. I had a reference once but lost it. In my
case the routers are somewhere on my ISPs network.
--Alex
___
[EMAIL
Ken Bolingbroke wrote:
I just jumped in the middle here, so I may be out of context.
But, stateful rules don't play nice with NAT.
You're quite right, they don't play nice at all.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree with you that the /etc/rc.firewall is the best example.
It's really a good
fbsd_user wrote:
The conclusion so far is that ipfw1 and ipfw2 using keep-state rules
on the interface facing the public internet with divert/nated does
not work period.
Probably my post hasn't reached you yet. I think you are mistaken if you mean
that keep-state rules cannot be securely used
Daren Desjardins wrote:
Over the weekend my bsd 4.9 apparantly rebooted for kicks by itself,
reporting a fatal trap 12 in messages. I looked through the list history
and found some posts indicating it may be a memory issue.
If you suspect a memory problem, then try getting your BIOS to find it.
701 - 719 of 719 matches
Mail list logo
