On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 04:53:25PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
Forgive me if this is off-topic.
How could I force a packet to go out through an interface,
despite the default route?
You have a couple of options.
Look at CARP in 5.4, that might do what you want best.
man 4 carp
Also google for:
.
I just don't want it to bind to that interface :-)
--
Avleen Vig Say no to cheese-eating surrender-monkeys
Systems AdminFast
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Andrew Friedley wrote:
I'm new to freebsd, coming from linux.
In linux I use a 1600x1200 framebuffer console, is it possible to set up
something like this in freebsd? I am not talking about X Windows, but
increasing the size of the default 80x25 console.
Probably one of
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Eric Timme wrote:
FilesystemSize Used Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a89M44M37M54%1535 9983 13% /
/dev/ad0s1e79M 4.0K72M 0% 2 102360% /tmp
/dev/ad0s1f 886M 620M 195M76% 107214
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, master wrote:
Hi all i have a little problem with ipfw
i have try the following command :
ipfw add 100 pipe 1 ip from 192.168.1.5 to any
and i have no more network then i try a ping and get
ping : sendto : No buffer space invalide
any idea how can i fix this?
Yes, you
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Murat Bicer wrote:
Is there anything that limits us from using ipfilter on top of this ipfw
b/w control?
Darren Reed, the owner of IPF is probably in the best position to answer
that question. I posed it a week ot two ago on the ipf mailing list.. I'm
waiting for a reply,
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, randall ehren wrote:
Darren could you answer this question please?
Maybe we could get Phil to add the answer to the FAQ.
http://www.google.com/search?q=ipfilter+ipfw+together
-- http://false.net/ipfilter/2000_02/0407.html
This is what we settled with eventually, but
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, randall ehren wrote:
not to stray too far, but if IPFW is set to allow all incoming packets and is
only used for shaping, and you have ipfilter handling nat, then it seems it
would just be:
network card -- IPFW (traffic shape) -- IPF (filter+nat) -- userland
i guess an
What kind of memory footprint reduction / speed increase can I expect if I
compile with the -fomit-frame-pointer option?
I already compile all of my ports with:
-O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -ffast-math -march=pentium
... but I'me hearing mixed views about -fomit-frame-pointer. I understand
I won't
This is getting quiet frustrating :-)
I don't want to use X, because I like to use my lovely console :)
Plus I'm only on a P233.
I've compiled SC_PIXEL_MODE into my kernel, which means I can use
vidcontrol to set the resolution to 800x600.
Fantastic!
Well, almost. When this happens, my video
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Doug Reynolds wrote:
Does anyone know of any really good faqs to setup imp3 webmail with
apache?
The Stable branch comes with fairly good install instuctions. It tells you
what you need to install before you install IMP. What's the problem?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
Well, I know BINd8 ships with FreeBSD, but I wanted to install BIND9.
So I installed the port.
Unfortuantely it didn't tell me where it expects the namedb dir to be, it
didn't put a startup script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d like other ports do..
Is this normal?
Should I just create my own and wing
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
I use TightVNC instead of vmware. Works quite fine, and it's almost
free (GPL).
As for office software: all my attempts to use various incarnations
ended in disasters:
[snip]
so, my advice would be: vmware or vnc.
I' asking here because I don't think the top an page is discriptive neough
for people who 'just don't get it' ;)
I understand that Inact memory is memory that has been requested by
processes but not in use. Is this correct?
I don't understand however, what Buf and Wired memory is used for. How
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Pierrick Brossin wrote:
Then don't enable one. A badly configured firewall is arguably worse
than no firewall at all.
wow no firewall is such a nice idea.
just kidding.. your server is then open to anyone.
E..
The only real benefits you get from a firewall are:
1)
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Pierrick Brossin wrote:
I would advice doing a test installation of FreeBSD (see
www.freebsd.org/handbook) and having a go at installing the packages you
need.
What do you think?
I already tried to make my own server but there were to many problem
for not so much
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Pierrick Brossin wrote:
The first thing I said is I have a server at home which is SME and it is a
distribution that stand on one CD and it can install a full server
(IMAP,POP,SMTP,DNS,HTTP,FTP,SSH,) in 10-12 minutes .. Then you have a web
interface to configure your
E..
The only real benefits you get from a firewall are:
1) controlling which IP addresses can access a service
2) *maybe* bandwidth shaping. *maybe*.
3) packet re-writing.
That's all ?
That's all really!
I thought the firewall was THE thing to have when you have a server which
Thre are utilities availible for Windows/DOS that allow you to get the
BIOS and chipset versions etc from a command prompt. Some of these are
written by the BIOS manufacturers or motherboard manufacturers but most
are third party freeware jobs.
Is anythign similar availible for FreeBSD? I have a
Maybe a question for freebsd-hackers.. not sure..
FreeBSD 4.4, P166, 128Mb, 3 HD's: ad0, ad1, ad4, as ata0-master,
ata1-master and ata2-master. ata2-master is a Promise ata 100 controller
(tx2 I think).
For several months my server has been panicing, and I'm starting to think
it's a bad
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Jett Tayer wrote:
try cvsup'ng again. re make your world/kernel
and see the results
hope it will be fine...
I had been having the problem for several months prior to that last cvsup
I did. I don't think (looking back over the commit data) that canything's
changed that
21 matches
Mail list logo