Hi Савельев Владимир,
El día Saturday, April 27, 2013 a las 08:59:36PM +0400, Савельев Владимир
escribió:
Hi, colleagues!
I am trying to install FreeBSD 9 to my notebook Acer Aspire V3-571G.
Ports I am trying to install:
/usr/ports/x11/xorg
My issue is that build
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 12:07:41 -0800 (PST)
leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote:
Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. Can FreeBSD 9.1 be installed on a
computer on which Windows XP currently resides? If so, how can this
installation be done? In particular, is there a way to install 9.1 so
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 13:51 +0100, Eduardo Morras wrote:
As an addon to other answers, you can install VirtualBox, create a
minimal hard disk with MBR boot menu that points to the WindowsXP
partition. This way you don't need to restart in WinXP. The same can
be done from WinXP side, a minimal
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:14:05 +0100
Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@rocketmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 13:51 +0100, Eduardo Morras wrote:
As an addon to other answers, you can install VirtualBox, create a
minimal hard disk with MBR boot menu that points to the WindowsXP
partition. This
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 14:31 +0100, Eduardo Morras wrote:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:14:05 +0100
Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@rocketmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 13:51 +0100, Eduardo Morras wrote:
As an addon to other answers, you can install VirtualBox, create a
minimal hard disk with
Eduardo Morras emorr...@yahoo.es writes:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 12:07:41 -0800 (PST)
leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote:
Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. Can FreeBSD 9.1 be installed on
a computer on which Windows XP currently resides? If so, how can
this installation be done? In
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 09:05 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
It is my understanding that FreeBSD doesn't allow using part of a disk,
but grabs the entire disk. That means that VirtualBox can't use
partitions on a disk that any other partitions are being used by
anything else, including FreeBSD
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, Carl Johnson wrote:
Eduardo Morras emorr...@yahoo.es writes:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 12:07:41 -0800 (PST)
leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote:
Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. Can FreeBSD 9.1 be installed on
a computer on which Windows XP currently resides? If so,
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 12:25 -0600, Warren Block wrote:
Booting the same Windows install alternately in a VM and then on real
hardware may trigger the Genuine Advantage annoyance.
This is true, but for some exceptional cases perhaps untrue.
I wasn't aware about this possibility, but it does
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com writes:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, Carl Johnson wrote:
It is my understanding that FreeBSD doesn't allow using part of a disk,
but grabs the entire disk. That means that VirtualBox can't use
partitions on a disk that any other partitions are being used by
anything
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, Carl Johnson wrote:
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com writes:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, Carl Johnson wrote:
It is my understanding that FreeBSD doesn't allow using part of a disk,
but grabs the entire disk. That means that VirtualBox can't use
partitions on a disk that any
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 12:07:41 -0800 (PST)
leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote:
Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. Can FreeBSD 9.1 be installed
on a computer on which Windows XP currently resides? If so, how
can this installation be done? In particular, is there a way to
install 9.1 so
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:07 PM, leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote:
Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. Can FreeBSD 9.1 be installed on a
computer on which Windows XP currently resides?
As others have already answered, yes. The risks are minimal if you are
careful but you will always
On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 21:27 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
Partition Magic
I would avoid to use proprietary software, ntfs, fat16 and fat32 are
full supported by Linux gparted, available for free as in beer at
http://partedmagic.com as a live media. Perhaps you need to defragment
the Windows
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 21:49:29 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 21:27 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
Partition Magic
I would avoid to use proprietary software, ntfs, fat16 and fat32 are
full supported by Linux gparted, available for free as in beer at
http://partedmagic.com as a
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 21:27:45 +0100, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 12:07:41 -0800 (PST),
leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote:
Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. Can FreeBSD 9.1 be
installed on a computer on which Windows XP currently
resides?
Yes.
If so,
Issue solved; I forgot to edit .xinitrc.
Cheers,
Hooman
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:06 AM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:28:13 +, Hooman Oroojeni wrote:
Dear All,
I would like to use GUI in Freebsd 9, but I face with following error.
Any idea to help is
Hi,
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:28:13 +
Hooman Oroojeni orooj...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All,
I would like to use GUI in Freebsd 9, but I face with following error.
I think that you have mist a paste command here.
Anyway, what graphics adaptor are you using? Intel? It it is Intel,
read about
On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:28:13 +, Hooman Oroojeni wrote:
Dear All,
I would like to use GUI in Freebsd 9, but I face with following error.
Any idea to help is appreciated.
You need to show the error message for diagnostics and
suggestions better than pure guessing. :-)
Meanwhile, allow me to
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote:
Is the HPN patchset included with the base OpenSSH the full patchset? Does
it include the threaded CTR patch? I can't seem to find a clear answer to
this.
crypto/openssh/README.hpn references it so I would assume so.
--
Adam
Take a look at freebsd-hackers mailing list... I have suggested some
change in some Makefile and sh script in order to unless at this moment to
be able to have an unattended system built with sysinstall (the idea I
think it was to maintain sysinstall in 9.0 unless) and using you're
--On 01 March 2012 11:53 +0100 ego...@ramattack.net wrote:
So I recomend you reading last mails of mine in freebsd-hackers...
Hope it helps,
Bye!
For what it's worth - I've resolved the issue I had (which was basically
the system booted, but failed trying to re-mount root as RW, and hence
In the new way of booting... you need to have the cd because the own
cd is the root filesystem... and in fact is live filesystem too so
unless you're booting from mfsroot... I assume you should have that line
in /etc/fstab inside the iso image but if you're using mfsroot... I
really
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:02:29 -0800
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Janos Dohanics w...@3dresearch.com wrote:
1. The Guided partitioning doesn't suggest any more to
create /var, /tmp, /usr, etc. file systems. Is it really
the recommendation to go with just / ?
Depends on who you ask :)
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:20:03 +0100
Michael Cardell Widerkrantz m...@hack.org wrote:
Janos Dohanics w...@3dresearch.com, 2012-02-08 19:42 (+0100):
4. Also, with GPT, one has to be in single user mode to synchronize
disks - correct?
I think the guide you linked to:
Janos Dohanics w...@3dresearch.com wrote:
1. The Guided partitioning doesn't suggest any more to
create /var, /tmp, /usr, etc. file systems. Is it really
the recommendation to go with just / ?
Depends on who you ask :) and on your intended usage.
2. Is there a way to use the old sysinstall
Janos Dohanics w...@3dresearch.com, 2012-02-08 19:42 (+0100):
4. Also, with GPT, one has to be in single user mode to synchronize
disks - correct?
I think the guide you linked to:
http://blather.michaelwlucas.com/archives/1071
meant that you have to be in single user mode until you have
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 13:42:59 -0500
Janos Dohanics w...@3dresearch.com wrote:
Hello Everyone,
May be I should have searched more for answers, but after installing
FreeBSD 9 with gmirror, I am wondering if the experts here have some
recommendations for best practices.
1. The Guided
3. Assuming one has enough RAM, is zfs mirror or raidz recommended over
gmirror?
zfs mirror but I would not recommend a raidz root on zfs.
--
George Kontostanos
Aicom telecoms ltd
http://www.aisecure.net
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
I can't speak to the mirror issue, but I had difficulty trying to tweak
the defaults in the install on a 128G SSD:
When manually configuring the SSD, I tried to leave some extra space at
the end of the SSD. Not sure that is necessary or not. In any case, I
had a 128GB SSD, reported as
On 02.02.2012 15:12, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
Might try:
Commenting out CFLAGS=
Setting NO_WERROR= in /etc/make.conf
Removing the CFLAGS= line made no difference, after some searching for
info about the NO_WERROR=, I went ahead and added the CFLAGS line back
in added NO_WERROR= WERROR=
On 2 February 2012 14:43, Dean E. Weimer dwei...@dweimer.net wrote:
I am trying to rebuild everything in a development machine with clang to
test for production, and ran into a problem on the buildworld process. This
machine was already rebuilt from source using gcc, here are the options I
On 01/26/2012 01:57 AM, Da Rock wrote:
Despite having similar hardware, you're only real best bet is to suck
it and see. Try installing and seeing what you can get to work
(dmesg, pciconf -lv, usbconfig, kldload modules, questions here, etc).
I've had mixed success with laptops (they're just
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 18:54, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote:
On 1/25/2012 5:43 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
I have a Huawei E1820
I will also try RTFM.
Hi,
kldload u3g
kldload umodem
Done, although kldload u3g tells me that file already exists! Perhaps
because
On 1/26/2012 10:58 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Hi,
kldload u3g
kldload umodem
Done, although kldload u3g tells me that file already exists! Perhaps
because I booted up with my Huawei dongle plugged in.
kldstat | grep u3g shows me nothing though.
Looks like
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 19:12, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote:
On 1/26/2012 10:58 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Hi,
kldload u3g
kldload umodem
Done, although kldload u3g tells me that file already exists! Perhaps
because I booted up with my Huawei
Odhiambo Washington odhia...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 18:54, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote:
On 1/25/2012 5:43 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
I have a Huawei E1820
I will also try RTFM.
Hi,
kldload u3g
kldload umodem
Done, although kldload u3g
On 1/26/2012 12:00 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Hi Mike,
I guess the internet.com http://internet.com in
AT+CGDCONT=1,\\\IP\\\,\\\internet.com http://internet.com/\\\ OK \
refer to the APN? I know I need to read ppp.conf again soon :)
Hi,
Yes, thats the APN. Your APN seems to
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 19:37, Mike Tancsa m...@sentex.net wrote:
On 1/24/2012 10:56 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
I am Google-ing for a recent definitive HOWTO use my 3G modem with
FreeBSD/PC-BSD and what I get seem rather old.
Someone can point me to a recent document detailing the
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 21:48, Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Odhiambo Washington
odhia...@gmail.com wrote:
I am Google-ing for a recent definitive HOWTO use my 3G modem with
FreeBSD/PC-BSD and what I get seem rather old.
Which one? You need to
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:23, Ivan Frosty ivanfro...@gmail.com wrote:
The FreeBSD u3g driver ¶¶
Introduction ¶¶
This driver supports 3G (UMTS, HSDPA, HSUPA, HSPA) cards that provide
access to one or more serial ports through a USB interface, providing
PPP and AT command channels
El día Tuesday, January 24, 2012 a las 10:23:18PM -0800, Ivan Frosty escribió:
The FreeBSD u3g driver ¶¶
Introduction ¶¶
This driver supports 3G (UMTS, HSDPA, HSUPA, HSPA) cards that provide
access to one or more serial ports through a USB interface, providing
PPP and AT command channels
On 1/25/2012 5:43 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
I have a Huawei E1820
I will also try RTFM.
Hi,
kldload u3g
kldload umodem
plug in the modem
Show the output of
usbconfig
then
sysctl -a dev.u3g
and
ls -l /dev/cuaU*
and
dmesg
On some 3g sticks, you have to send a
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Odhiambo Washington odhia...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
You know, sometimes all this process is what makes people shy off of *BSD. I
am a diehard lover of FreeBSD, but the few times I have installed Linux on my
laptop, this whole process was a breeze... well,
On 01/26/12 11:50, Kaya Saman wrote:
Hi,
I discovered this thread:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=25539
and am wondering what will and won't work on my Lenovo X220
I'm currently in the process in deciding between FreeBSD 9 and Fedora
15/16. I love FreeBSD on servers but
I'm running 8.2 on an X200. For the most part everything works. My
main complaint is that the sound is very quiet, and I haven't found
the setting to fix that.
Video and wifi work fine. The kernel sees the camera and the thumb
reader but I haven't looked for applications that use them.
R's,
On 1/24/2012 10:56 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
I am Google-ing for a recent definitive HOWTO use my 3G modem with
FreeBSD/PC-BSD and what I get seem rather old.
Someone can point me to a recent document detailing the steps. I have
PC-BSD 9 on my laptop.
Most of them just come up as cuaU*
All of these complaints can go directly to /dev/null
Just as you don't get to express your opinion about the government if you
don't vote, you don't get to express your opinion about -RELEASE changes
when you didn't run the STABLE/RC/BETAs. You had your chance to help
improve FreeBSD for
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:27:32 -0600
Mark Felder articulated:
Just as you don't get to express your opinion about the government if
you don't vote,
Excuse me, but are you just trying to look naive?
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:40:42 -0600, je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:27:32 -0600
Mark Felder articulated:
Just as you don't get to express your opinion about the government if
you don't vote,
Excuse me, but are you just trying to look naive?
The wording wasn't exactly as
I've recently been presented with new information: namely that RC3 had
sysinstall as an option (I did not know this, and I've been reading the
lists) and that it was taken away for -RELEASE even though it was agreed
upon that would not happen for 9.x.
I'll crawl under this rock now.
Allan
___
Erm, you have to realize the new installer was discussed at length here,
when 9.0 was still under development/beta/prerelease.
Alternatively, you could do like me and install entirely by hand:
- boot
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Wojciech Puchar
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 10:25 AM
To: Damien Fleuriot
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Horrible installer (was: Re: FreeBSD 9
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 07:25:03PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
And IMHO sysinstall should not exist, while good documentation about
installing BY HAND should be there.
I agree with the part of that sentence following the comma. That is all.
Someone that cannot install it him/herself
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:52:17AM -0600, Mark Felder wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:40:42 -0600, je...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:27:32 -0600
Mark Felder articulated:
Just as you don't get to express your opinion about the government if
you don't vote,
Excuse me, but
I'm very new to FreeBSD but it seems to me that the installer is pretty much
ok. My only wish is that there might be a little more info upfront somewhere,
preferably in the installer somewhere, about setting up for a dual boot. I
couldn't find in the handbook, (that may be my fault, don't
On Monday 23 January 2012 05:18:01 pm B. Kyle Adkins wrote:
I'm very new to FreeBSD but it seems to me that the installer is
pretty much ok. My only wish is that there might be a little more
info upfront somewhere, preferably in the installer somewhere, about
setting up for a dual boot. I
On Monday 23 January 2012 12:17:33 pm Mark Felder wrote:
I've recently been presented with new information: namely that RC3
had sysinstall as an option (I did not know this, and I've been
reading the lists) and that it was taken away for -RELEASE even
though it was agreed upon that would not
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 05:31:00PM -0800, Devin Teske wrote:
-Original Message- From: 'Frank Shute'
[mailto:fr...@shute.org.uk] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 4:52
PM To: Devin Teske Cc: 'Chad Perrin';
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Dave Robison Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9
Allan McKinnon mckinnon at live.com writes:
...
I really enjoyed the old installer because then I had complete control over
how I tweaked my computer during and after the install.
I agree.
The new installer got rid of dependencies and is scriptable - very good !
But the new installer
At 10:05 19/01/2012, you wrote:
Allan McKinnon mckinnon at live.com writes:
...
I really enjoyed the old installer because then I had complete
control over
how I tweaked my computer during and after the install.
I agree.
The new installer got rid of dependencies and is scriptable - very
Eduardo Morras nec556 at retena.com writes:
...
I think that a full/complete update of the old installer to add it
support GEOM, ZFS, scripting and more newer features will consume
more manpower and resources than create a new one from scratch, where
the devs aren't chained by old code,
On Jan 18, 2012 9:37 PM, Allan McKinnon mckin...@live.com wrote:
I finally got to install FreeBSD 9 onto my computer and noticed that the
installer is now different. It seems to me that it forces you into doing
extra steps that I was comfortable doing on my own. I really enjoyed the
old
On 1/19/12 3:25 AM, Allan McKinnon wrote:
I finally got to install FreeBSD 9 onto my computer and noticed that the
installer is now different. It seems to me that it forces you into doing
extra steps that I was comfortable doing on my own. I really enjoyed the old
installer because
On Jan 19, 2012, at 1:05 AM, inquiz inq...@gmx.com wrote:
Allan McKinnon mckinnon at live.com writes:
...
I really enjoyed the old installer because then I had complete control over
how I tweaked my computer during and after the install.
I agree.
The new installer got rid of
Devin Teske devin.teske at fisglobal.com writes:
...
The new installer got rid of dependencies and is scriptable - very good !
???
*cough* Old installer _is_ scriptable and had less external dependencies as it
was written in C not sh(1) *cough*
Well, here it is:
On Jan 19, 2012, at 7:20 AM, inquiz wrote:
Devin Teske devin.teske at fisglobal.com writes:
...
The new installer got rid of dependencies and is scriptable - very good !
???
*cough* Old installer _is_ scriptable and had less external dependencies as
it
was written in C not sh(1)
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:15:08AM +0100, Eduardo Morras wrote:
I think that a full/complete update of the old installer to add it
support GEOM, ZFS, scripting and more newer features will consume
more manpower and resources than create a new one from scratch,
where the devs aren't chained
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:41:37AM +, inquiz wrote:
Eduardo Morras nec556 at retena.com writes:
...
I think that a full/complete update of the old installer to add it
support GEOM, ZFS, scripting and more newer features will consume
more manpower and resources than create a new
On Jan 19, 2012, at 8:46 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:41:37AM +, inquiz wrote:
Eduardo Morras nec556 at retena.com writes:
...
I think that a full/complete update of the old installer to add it
support GEOM, ZFS, scripting and more newer features will consume
2012/1/19 Jonathan Vomacka juvi...@gmail.com:
On Jan 18, 2012 9:37 PM, Allan McKinnon mckin...@live.com wrote:
I finally got to install FreeBSD 9 onto my computer and noticed that the
installer is now different. It seems to me that it forces you into doing
extra steps that I was comfortable
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 8:43 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:15:08AM +0100, Eduardo
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:22:14AM -0800, Devin Teske wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:15:08AM +0100, Eduardo Morras wrote:
I think that a full/complete update of the old installer to add
it support GEOM, ZFS, scripting and more newer features will
consume more manpower and
-Original Message-
From: Frank Shute [mailto:fr...@shute.org.uk]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 12:01 PM
To: Devin Teske
Cc: 'Chad Perrin'; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:22:14AM -0800, Devin Teske wrote:
On Thu, Jan
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 02:36:29PM -0800, Devin Teske wrote:
From: Frank Shute
The new installer will get better with time.
The new installer is buggy, and the above maxim is something I'd rather not
have
to deal with when downloading RELEASE software.
I do not dispute that the new
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 3:15 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 02:36:29PM -0800, Devin
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 3:15 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 02:36:29PM -0800, Devin
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Devin Teske
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 4:33 PM
To: 'Chad Perrin'; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: Dave Robison
Subject: RE: FreeBSD 9
[snip
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 02:36:29PM -0800, Devin Teske wrote:
I believe the difficulty in maintenance stems primarily from
the fact that the existing partition editor MAY have to be
entirely rewritten to accommodate other root filesystem types
(but even that's not entirely true
-Original Message-
From: 'Frank Shute' [mailto:fr...@shute.org.uk]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 4:52 PM
To: Devin Teske
Cc: 'Chad Perrin'; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Dave Robison
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 02:36:29PM -0800, Devin Teske wrote
On 10/2/11 11:48 AM, Jukka A. Ukkonen wrote:
Greetings all,
Roughly a week ago I sent to this mailing list a question about
problems with installing FreeBSD 9 on an AMD64 system.
It seems that I now know the reason why booting from the install CD
failed. When buying the system I had not
Hi, this mail is from Japan.
My name is Hiroshi Saeki, a hobby user of FreeBSD.
I think that this issue is invoked by
kernel of FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3.
/usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_usrreq.c 1.244.2.2
may have problem.
I recommend you to revert older kernel.
For example,
downgrade to FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2,
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:10:29 +0900, Hiroshi Saeki
hsa...@wmail.plala.or.jp wrote:
Hi, this mail is from Japan.
My name is Hiroshi Saeki, a hobby user of FreeBSD.
I think that this issue is invoked by
kernel of FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3.
/usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_usrreq.c 1.244.2.2
may have problem.
I
Now flash plugin and skype 2.0 doesn't work after applying the lastest security
patch to 8.2-RELEASE
$ uname -srm
FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p3 amd64
launching skype doesn't show any output in console, it's just silently hangs.
there is nothing in logs either. Opera, firefox and nspluginwrapper are
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:58:48 +0200
crsnet.pl crs...@crsnet.pl wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:10:29 +0900, Hiroshi Saeki
hsa...@wmail.plala.or.jp wrote:
I think that this issue is invoked by
kernel of FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3.
/usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_usrreq.c 1.244.2.2
may have problem.
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:07:26 -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier
conr...@cox.net wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:58:48 +0200
crsnet.pl crs...@crsnet.pl wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:10:29 +0900, Hiroshi Saeki
hsa...@wmail.plala.or.jp wrote:
I think that this issue is invoked by
kernel of FreeBSD
On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 02:31:24 +0200
crsnet.pl crs...@crsnet.pl wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:07:26 -0500, Conrad J. Sabatier
conr...@cox.net wrote:
Strange, flash works fine for me under 9.0-BETA3. Go figure.
[cr4sh@x300 ~]$ uname -a
FreeBSD x300 9.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 #3: Tue
2011/9/29, crsnet.pl crs...@crsnet.pl:
Hello.
I make update yesterday with csup. And i have build new firefox 7 from
src.
And today i see my flashplayer dont work (under Opera/Firefox).
Opera about:plugins
Opis: Shockwave Flash 10.3 r183
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:22:56 -0500, Edgar Rodolfo
cybernaut...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/9/29, crsnet.pl crs...@crsnet.pl:
Hello.
I make update yesterday with csup. And i have build new firefox 7
from
src.
And today i see my flashplayer dont work (under Opera/Firefox).
Opera about:plugins
2011/9/27 crsnet.pl crs...@crsnet.pl:
Hi,
Hello, thanks for reply.
Please try to do this without wlan loaded at all (not just down, but
build your wifi support as a module.)
Then try without X, see whether it's related to that or not.
First i make kldunload if_iwn.
When i try to suspend
Hi,
Hello, thanks for reply.
Please try to do this without wlan loaded at all (not just down, but
build your wifi support as a module.)
Then try without X, see whether it's related to that or not.
First i make kldunload if_iwn.
When i try to suspend from X, Xorg close, i see console and
2. Kadu/Gnu Gadu.
I dont know why, but when i run kadu / gnu gadu and try to connect to
Gadu-Gadu network software segments ;/
Kadu with signal 6, GnuGadu with signal 11.
I try to use old gadulib, or recompie it. But this doesn't help ;/
I run portmaster -y --no-confirm --packages-if-newer -m
Hi,
Please try to do this without wlan loaded at all (not just down, but
build your wifi support as a module.)
Then try without X, see whether it's related to that or not.
(And you haven't told us what your hardware is.)
Adrian
___
On 09/26/2011 16:02, crsnet.pl wrote:
2. Kadu/Gnu Gadu.
I dont know why, but when i run kadu / gnu gadu and try to connect to
Gadu-Gadu network software segments ;/
Kadu with signal 6, GnuGadu with signal 11.
I try to use old gadulib, or recompie it. But this doesn't help ;/
I run
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:42 AM, O. Hartmann
ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
My question is: is it possible to migrate the two-disk pool without data
loss into a mirrored pool by adding the one 2TB-disk?
No, you cant create a two-way mirror of three disks with ZFS. The only
way of
On 26 January 2011 09:21, Christer Solskogen
christer.solsko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:42 AM, O. Hartmann
ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
My question is: is it possible to migrate the two-disk pool without data
loss into a mirrored pool by adding the one 2TB-disk?
In the last episode (Jan 26), Christer Solskogen said:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:42 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
My question is: is it possible to migrate the two-disk pool without data
loss into a mirrored pool by adding the one 2TB-disk?
No, you cant create a two-way mirror of three disks with
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com wrote:
In the last episode (Jan 26), Christer Solskogen said:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:42 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
My question is: is it possible to migrate the two-disk pool without data
loss into a mirrored pool by adding
In the last episode (Jan 26), Christer Solskogen said:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com wrote:
In the last episode (Jan 26), Christer Solskogen said:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:42 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
My question is: is it possible to migrate the
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com wrote:
ZFS lets you add and detach mirrors on the fly, since you're not changing
the capacity of the pool itself. Sure, you're going to lose the contents of
the large 2TB drive, but that's sort of assumed. You can't convert
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
