On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 17:12:30 -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
Doug Reynolds wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:21:08 -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
Not a critical question, but ...
Working on my spiffy test machine, I noticed that 5.0-RELEASE does
not have a mount_msdos command.
It's no biggie, I just used
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:12:40 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2003-01-22 16:52, Doug Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:21:08 -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
Working on my spiffy test machine, I noticed that 5.0-RELEASE does
not have a mount_msdos command. It's no biggie, I
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 01:42:47 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2003-01-23 00:12, Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange. This has been changed a while ago:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/mount_msdosfs/Makefile.diff?r1=1.17r2=1.18
and the only mount_msdos binary
On 2003-01-23 19:18, Doug Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:12:40 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2003-01-22 16:52, Doug Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:21:08 -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
Working on my spiffy test machine, I noticed that 5.0-RELEASE
Not a critical question, but ...
Working on my spiffy test machine, I noticed that 5.0-RELEASE does
not have a mount_msdos command.
It's no biggie, I just used 'mount -t msdos' and got what I wanted,
but I was wondering why this was missing? Is there a reason why
it was removed, or is it some
In the last episode (Jan 22), Bill Moran said:
Not a critical question, but ...
Working on my spiffy test machine, I noticed that 5.0-RELEASE does
not have a mount_msdos command. It's no biggie, I just used 'mount -t
msdos' and got what I wanted, but I was wondering why this was
missing?
Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Jan 22), Bill Moran said:
Not a critical question, but ...
Working on my spiffy test machine, I noticed that 5.0-RELEASE does
not have a mount_msdos command. It's no biggie, I just used 'mount -t
msdos' and got what I wanted, but I was wondering why this
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:21:08 -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
Not a critical question, but ...
Working on my spiffy test machine, I noticed that 5.0-RELEASE does
not have a mount_msdos command.
It's no biggie, I just used 'mount -t msdos' and got what I wanted,
but I was wondering why this was missing?
Doug Reynolds wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:21:08 -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
Not a critical question, but ...
Working on my spiffy test machine, I noticed that 5.0-RELEASE does
not have a mount_msdos command.
It's no biggie, I just used 'mount -t msdos' and got what I wanted,
but I was
On 2003-01-22 16:52, Doug Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:21:08 -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
Working on my spiffy test machine, I noticed that 5.0-RELEASE does
not have a mount_msdos command. It's no biggie, I just used 'mount
-t msdos' and got what I wanted, but I was
On 2003-01-23 00:12, Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Strange. This has been changed a while ago:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/mount_msdosfs/Makefile.diff?r1=1.17r2=1.18
and the only mount_msdos binary that I have in my system is a rather
stale copy from Oct 9
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 04:52:16PM -0500, Doug Reynolds wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:21:08 -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
Not a critical question, but ...
Working on my spiffy test machine, I noticed that 5.0-RELEASE does
not have a mount_msdos command.
It's no biggie, I just used 'mount -t
12 matches
Mail list logo
