On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:35:06 -0500
Reid Linnemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Incidentally, you can never do direct rendering over remote X connection
> because the client (which is executed on a remote system) does not have
> direct access to the memory of the display.
yes,i imagined that was
Written by Norberto Meijome on 06/03/07 20:43>>
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 15:11:26 +1000
Alex R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
it's in the archives of the list - you need to install the mesa-demos
port.
Installed it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ glxinfo
Error: unable to open display
But thats because I am s
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 15:11:26 +1000
Alex R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > it's in the archives of the list - you need to install the mesa-demos
> > port.
>
> Installed it.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ glxinfo
> Error: unable to open display
>
> But thats because I am ssh'd into the box from work,
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 13:16:00 +1000, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it's in the archives of the list - you need to install the mesa-demos
> port.
Installed it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ glxinfo
Error: unable to open display
But thats because I am ssh'd into the box from work, I dare say
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 13:16:00 +1000, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 13:01:22 +1000
> What does /var/log/Xorg.0.log tell you about it?
(have chopped out the irrelevant bits as the log is far too long to post here)
(II) LoadModule: "dri"
(II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xo
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 13:01:22 +1000
Alex R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 31 May 2007 16:13:48 +1000, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > it actually isn't that hard - just issue the commands, let it build and
> > install... anyway, you wont be getting DRI until you do it (
On Thu, 31 May 2007 16:13:48 +1000, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> it actually isn't that hard - just issue the commands, let it build and
> install... anyway, you wont be getting DRI until you do it (or 6.3 comes
> out,
> in which case you may be able to use freebsd-update to upg
On Thu, 31 May 2007 13:06:39 +1000
Alex R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not feeling that brave, I got dizzy after reading the first two pages :P
it actually isn't that hard - just issue the commands, let it build and
install... anyway, you wont be getting DRI until you do it (or 6.3 comes out
Alex R writes:
> > sure, update your src tree and rebuild your kernel and world (and install
> > them :) ).
> >
> > and, just in case, you can find how to do that here:
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html
>
> I'm not feeling that brave, I go
On Thu, 31 May 2007 12:33:35 +1000, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sure, update your src tree and rebuild your kernel and world (and install
> them :) ).
>
> and, just in case, you can find how to do that here:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld
On Thu, 31 May 2007 7:53:39 +1000
Alex R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I need to 'stable' for DRI to work. If the issue with DRI on the i945 was
> fixed some time ago, as someone else suggested, why hasn't it been merged
> into 6.2-Release?
Because 6.2-RELEASE had already been, ahem, 'release
At 05:53 PM 5/30/2007, Alex R wrote:
> 6.2-what? You are probably running Release; you don't have Stable unless
> you've updated source and re-compiled everything. Stable is really a few
You're right.. And my fault for assuming Release/Stable meant the
same thing.. My bad..
S'ok... it's q
On Wed, 30 May 2007 16:38:56 -0400, Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 6.2-what? You are probably running Release; you don't have Stable unless
> you've updated source and re-compiled everything. Stable is really a few
> steps ahead of release, with additional features and fixes, believed to be,
>
Alex R wrote:
This does not seem to be the case for me. As an experiment, I booted from a
7-CURRENT CD and installed it (May snapshot) and it was detected! But not in
6.2/i386. Its detected as AGP, though the machine has no AGP slot in it?!?!?
6.2-what? You are probably running Release; you
On Wed, 30 May 2007 11:26:24 -0500, Reid Linnemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i945 dri is working in 6-STABLE as of some months ago.
This does not seem to be the case for me. As an experiment, I booted from a
7-CURRENT CD and installed it (May snapshot) and it was detected! But not in
6.2/i
Reid Linnemann ha scritto:
> Written by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/29/07 20:14>>
>> Hi All
>>
>> Installed FreeBSD i386, Rel 6.2 on a machine thats got an i945 chipset
>> on the motherboard, integrated video too. Everything seems to be
>> supported, SATA controllers the lot... but no AGP or DRM suppor
Written by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/29/07 20:14>>
Hi All
Installed FreeBSD i386, Rel 6.2 on a machine thats got an i945 chipset on
the motherboard, integrated video too. Everything seems to be supported,
SATA controllers the lot... but no AGP or DRM support?
i have the statements
device agp
Hi All
Installed FreeBSD i386, Rel 6.2 on a machine thats got an i945 chipset on
the motherboard, integrated video too. Everything seems to be supported,
SATA controllers the lot... but no AGP or DRM support?
i have the statements
device agp
device drm
device i915drm
in my kernel conf, aft
18 matches
Mail list logo
