Re: C interpreters

2008-02-02 Thread Jim Stapleton
Thanks, it's decent, seems to not act like a full shell though. If I ctrl-z while in emacs, it drops me out of CH as well as emacs. still, it's a nice play toy. thanks, -Jim Stapleton On Jan 31, 2008 9:54 PM, Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:12:35AM -0500, Jim

C interpreters

2008-01-31 Thread Jim Stapleton
Does anyone have a recommendation on C interpreters? I want to do some development in C, but I would also like to have the ability of playing with an interactive command line a-la python, as it eases the playing process of figuring out what I am doing. There are a few options in the ports tree

Re: C interpreters

2008-01-31 Thread Heiko Wundram (Beenic)
Am Donnerstag, 31. Januar 2008 14:48:15 schrieb Jim Stapleton: as a secondary (probably stupid) question: how hard is it to write a library in C++ and allow C programs to use it? To write a library in C++ to which C programs have access, you'll have to write a set of wrapper functions for

Re: C interpreters

2008-01-31 Thread Jim Stapleton
Thanks, and that'll make shared (.so) libraries just fine? Well, that was certainly a relief. That very much describes the C interface I made already. I'm working on a alternate ports listing system, and I wanted to use something that I didn't mind programming in /and/ I knew should be available

Re: C interpreters

2008-01-31 Thread Gary Kline
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:12:35AM -0500, Jim Stapleton wrote: Thanks, and that'll make shared (.so) libraries just fine? Well, that was certainly a relief. That very much describes the C interface I made already. I'm working on a alternate ports listing system, and I wanted to use something