Re: Where to place refuse file for CVSUP?

--- Jose Borquez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In my ports-supfile my base=/var/db and prefix=/usr. Does that mean I should place my refuse file in /var/db/sup/ ? I am a little confused, so if anyone can help me out it would be greatly appreciated. Please see the Handbook:

Re: Where to place refuse file for CVSUP?

On 3/1/06, Jose Borquez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In my ports-supfile my base=/var/db and prefix=/usr. Does that mean I should place my refuse file in /var/db/sup/ ? I am a little confused, so if anyone can help me out it would be greatly appreciated. from man 1 cvsup: If the supfile

Re: Where to place refuse file for CVSUP?

On Wednesday 01 March 2006 21:10, Jose Borquez wrote: In my ports-supfile my base=/var/db and prefix=/usr. Does that mean I should place my refuse file in /var/db/sup/ ? I am a little confused, so if anyone can help me out it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Jose

release in cvsup supfile

Hey people, I notice that in my supfile, I have this: *default release=cvs tag=. I'm using FreeBSD 5.4. Should I change the tag to 5.4-RELEASE? I don't want ports that aren't going to work on 5.4. Is that a concern? Thanks, Mike -- Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any intelligent fool

Re: release in cvsup supfile

it should be. The Handbook is quite clear on this point: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html#CVSUP-CONFIG-VERS __ Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca

Re: release in cvsup supfile

to work on 5.4. Is that a concern? No, that's the way it should be. The Handbook is quite clear on this point: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html# CVSUP-CONFIG-VERS Well now, I think that depends on what else he's got in his supfile. He may have a problem

Re: release in cvsup supfile

to have at least two cvsup files, one for the system and the other for ports and everything else so keep reading (all the way to the end!) Change *default host to the cvsup server of your choice, servers are listed at the bottom of this page: http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/cvsup.html Change

Re: release in cvsup supfile

On 2/24/06, Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now install FreeBSD, delete the old slices first with fdisk and don't install X11, the only package you should install is cvsup-without-gui. After FreeBSD is installed run cvsup to get all the new ports, then uninstall perl, run

Re: release in cvsup supfile

going to work on 5.4. Is that a concern? No, but you need to have at least two cvsup files, one for the system and the other for ports Maybe I'm doing something wrong. I have only one file for everything: *default host=cvsup1.ca.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default

Re: release in cvsup supfile

the tag to 5.4-RELEASE? I don't want ports that aren't going to work on 5.4. Is that a concern? No, but you need to have at least two cvsup files, one for the system and the other for ports Maybe I'm doing something wrong. I have only one file for everything: *default host=cvsup1

CVSUP ?

I have a question in regards to CVSUP. Does it sometimes not delete old files. I did a sync on my ports. I built CUPS and the install scripts were putting files in the wrong place. I fixed it by manually deleting the cups directory and getting the fresh tarballs from from the ports site

Re: CVSUP ?

Chris Maness wrote: I have a question in regards to CVSUP. Does it sometimes not delete old files. I did a sync on my ports. I built CUPS and the install scripts were putting files in the wrong place. I fixed it by manually deleting the cups directory and getting the fresh tarballs from

cvsup question - use just one supfile?

Hi, I've been sup'ing a few different trees for a little while now, and I'm wondering: is it possible to do all at once with the same supfile? Something like: *default host=CHANGE_THIS.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5_3 *default release=cvs

Re: cvsup question - use just one supfile?

At 04:25 AM 2/12/2006, Joel Hatton wrote: Hi, I've been sup'ing a few different trees for a little while now, and I'm wondering: is it possible to do all at once with the same supfile? Something like: *default host=CHANGE_THIS.FreeBSD.org *default base=/var/db *default prefix=/usr *default

recovering from failed cvsup upgrade

Greetings. I need help recovering a system that became unresponsive during an upgrade. Steps: 1. Using cvsup, I tried to upgrade a system from RELENG_5_2 to RELENG_5_3 with the usual sequence: cvsup -g -L 2 (cvsup file) make -j 4 buildworld make buildkernel KERNCONF=SMP make installkernel

Re: recovering from failed cvsup upgrade

wo_shi_big_stomach wrote: Greetings. I need help recovering a system that became unresponsive during an upgrade. Steps: Download the FreeBSD 5.4 .iso image, and do a binary upgrade installation from that. You should have run mergemaster -p before the initial buildworld, and you should run

Re: recovering from failed cvsup upgrade

before the initial buildworld, and you should run mergemaster without the flag afterwards... Thanks -- I have that system back. Whew. The upgrade routine warned that it could not replace the /usr/src tree and that cvsup was the right way to do this. To get this system from 5.4-RELEASE

Re: recovering from failed cvsup upgrade

wo_shi_big_stomach wrote: Thanks -- I have that system back. Whew. [ ... ] You're welcome. The upgrade routine warned that it could not replace the /usr/src tree and that cvsup was the right way to do this. To get this system from 5.4-RELEASE to RELENG_5_4, am I ok just cvsup'ing src-all

Question about synchronizing source tree with cvsup

I would like to synchronize a server which I did a minimal install. I would like to customize the stable-supfile so as not to download unneeded files. I would like to know what options I need to include from the following to do a source sync of only the essential files: #src-base #src-bin

Re: Question about synchronizing source tree with cvsup

Jose Borquez wrote: I would like to synchronize a server which I did a minimal install. I would like to customize the stable-supfile so as not to download unneeded files. I would like to know what options I need to include from the following to do a source sync of only the essential files:

Best time of day/week to cvsup?

For example, what time of day, and the day of the week, is typically the best time to sync up with 6-STABLE or 7-CURRENT, to minimize dealing with untested new commits. Same goes for the ports system. Are there any cvs usage stats or web server usage stats for the FreeBSD project? I'd like to

Re: Best time of day/week to cvsup?

On 2006-01-21 02:30, Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For example, what time of day, and the day of the week, is typically the best time to sync up with 6-STABLE or 7-CURRENT, to minimize dealing with untested new commits. CURRENT is, by definition, a fair bit unpredictable. Unless,

Re: Unable to make buildkernel (fresh cvsup to RELENG_6)

Laurence Sanford [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm upgrading a 5.4 machine to 6. I can buildworld successfully, but attempting to make buildkernel fails: HEADERS -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -I/usr/include -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Colossus /usr/src/sys/modules/ti/../../pci/if_ti.c

Unable to make buildkernel (fresh cvsup to RELENG_6)

I'm upgrading a 5.4 machine to 6. I can buildworld successfully, but attempting to make buildkernel fails: HEADERS -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -I/usr/include -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Colossus /usr/src/sys/modules/ti/../../pci/if_ti.c /usr/src/sys/modules/ti/../../pci/if_ti.c:2536:35:

Re: portsnap vs cvsup

On 9 Jan 2006, at 09:01, Albert Shih wrote: Hi all What's the advantage of portsnap vs old-fashion cvsup ? cvsup only runs on a very limited set of architectures and forces you to build or fetch INDEX files yourself. Having said that, it's useful in non ports/ situations too. Ceri

Re: portsnap vs cvsup

What's the advantage of portsnap vs old-fashion cvsup ? The package description covers that. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/ports/sysutils/portsnap/pkg-descr?rev=1.2content-type=text/plain ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing

portsnap vs cvsup

Hi all What's the advantage of portsnap vs old-fashion cvsup ? Lots of thanks. Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. Heure local/Local time: Mon Jan 9 10:00:00 CET 2006 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org

cvsup question

How can I modify the cvsup reconnect time form 5 to 1 min ? -- Regards , Vasile C pgpwwFwjDujVT.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: cvsup question

Vasile C wrote: How can I modify the cvsup reconnect time form 5 to 1 min ? A more useful approach would be to switch to downloading from another cvsup server... -- -Chuck ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org

Re: cvsup question

I have a script in cron that does cvsup and portupgrade ... That is why I want to change the reconnect time .. On Sunday 11 December 2005 18:21, Chuck Swiger wrote: Vasile C wrote: How can I modify the cvsup reconnect time form 5 to 1 min ? A more useful approach would be to switch

Re: cvsup question

Vasile C wrote: A more useful approach would be to switch to downloading from another cvsup server... I have a script in cron that does cvsup and portupgrade ... That is why I want to change the reconnect time .. I hope this is a testbed and is not a production system. Automaticly running

Re: cvsup question

On Sunday, December 11, 2005 11:26:24 AM Vasile C [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cvsup question Wrote these words of wisdom: I have a script in cron that does cvsup and portupgrade ... That is why I want to change the reconnect time .. On Sunday 11 December 2005 18:21, Chuck Swiger

Re: cvsup question

Can someone PLEASE answer my question without asking me more questions ? Is there a way to change the reconnect time or not ? On Sunday 11 December 2005 18:54, Gerard Seibert wrote: On Sunday, December 11, 2005 11:26:24 AM Vasile C [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cvsup question Wrote

Re: cvsup question

Vasile C wrote: Can someone PLEASE answer my question without asking me more questions ? Is there a way to change the reconnect time or not ? Not without modifying the source code to cvsup. What I recommend you do is add the '-1' flag to your cvsup command line -- so cvsup will try once

Newbie: Ports upgrade, CVSup, and disk space problems

Hi, all. I'm new to FreeBSD. I'm setting up a machine to act as a webserver using: FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p12-jc2 (jail18) #0 Tonight I added the package: cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_2 and ran: # cvsup -g -L 2 /root/cvs-supfile After it ran (which took over an hour), I realized I used

Re: Newbie: Ports upgrade, CVSup, and disk space problems

On Wednesday 07 December 2005 14:43, Charles Haynes wrote: Hi, all. I'm new to FreeBSD. I'm setting up a machine to act as a webserver using: FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE-p12-jc2 (jail18) #0 Tonight I added the package: cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_2 and ran: # cvsup -g -L 2 /root/cvs-supfile

cvsup update and source sync confusion

I am confused about how to cvsup my freeBSD 6 system. I understand the ports update stuff. Lots of good doc on this. Its updating the rest of the system that don't understand. My current adventure beging when I read the 3ware knowledgebase article http://www.3ware.com/kb/article.aspx?id

cvsup update and source sync confusion

I am confused about how to cvsup my freeBSD 6 system. I understand the ports update stuff. Lots of good doc on this. Its updating the rest of the system that I don't understand. My current adventure beging when I read the 3ware knowledgebase article http://www.3ware.com/kb/article.aspx?id

Re: cvsup update and source sync confusion

Jon Hancock wrote: I am confused about how to cvsup my freeBSD 6 system. I understand the ports update stuff. Lots of good doc on this. Its updating the rest of the system that don't understand. My current adventure beging when I read the 3ware knowledgebase article http://www.3ware.com

pkg_add of CVSup errors when looking for dependencies

I am attempting to install the cvsup package I downloaded using pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_2.tbz, but I keep getting the following error: Error: FTP Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.4-release/Latest/cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_2.tbz: File unavailable

Re: pkg_add of CVSup errors when looking for dependencies

On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 08:05, Jose Borquez wrote: I am attempting to install the cvsup package I downloaded using pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_2.tbz, but I keep getting the following error: Error: FTP Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.4-release

Re: pkg_add of CVSup errors when looking for dependencies

On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:05:11AM -0800, Jose Borquez wrote: I am attempting to install the cvsup package I downloaded using pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_2.tbz, but I keep getting the following error: Error: FTP Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5.4

Re: pkg_add of CVSup errors when looking for dependencies

On Friday 02 December 2005 09:06, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 12:05:11AM -0800, Jose Borquez wrote: I am attempting to install the cvsup package I downloaded using pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui-16.1h_2.tbz, but I keep getting the following error: Error: FTP Unable to get

4.7 -- 6.0 via cvsup

I have a system running 4.7. Can I upgrade it to 6.0 via cvsup? If not what is the best way? hal ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL

Re: 4.7 -- 6.0 via cvsup

hal wrote: I have a system running 4.7. Can I upgrade it to 6.0 via cvsup? If not what is the best way? Afaik, You must upgrade to 5.x first and then You can move to 6.x. Anyway FreeBSD 4.x uses an older and slower filesystem UFS1, whilst FreeBSD 5.x and newer uses UFS2. Accordingly

Re: 4.7 -- 6.0 via cvsup

On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 10:19:54PM +0100, K?vesd?n G?bor wrote: hal wrote: I have a system running 4.7. Can I upgrade it to 6.0 via cvsup? If not what is the best way? Afaik, You must upgrade to 5.x first and then You can move to 6.x. Yes. It might be easier to do a binary upgrade

RE: CVSup doubts

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Efren Bravo Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 10:39 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: CVSup doubts Hi, I'm trying to configure CVSup to download only ports but I've

Re: CVSup doubts

vizion wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Efren Bravo Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 10:39 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: CVSup doubts Hi, I'm trying to configure CVSup to download only ports but I've

Re: CVSup doubts

Chris wrote: I hate users looking for the shortcuts. Funny. I didn't see that at all in the original email. What I saw was a genuine misunderstanding. He was asking about using CVSUP to track ports on a one by one basis. What he didn't understand is that a person really wants to CVSUP

Re: CVSup doubts

Jason, David, Chen and the others, !=Chris, I don't lose my time to answering him because I wouldn't have time to read the CVSup man pages as Chris suggests, jajajajaja thanks for your help --- Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: vizion wrote: -Original Message- From

Re: CVSup doubts

On 2005-11-26 23:28, Efren Bravo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jason, David, Chen and the others, !=Chris, I don't lose my time to answering him because I wouldn't have time to read the CVSup man pages as Chris suggests, jajajajaja thanks for your help Strange as his style may seem, he

CVSup doubts

Hi, I'm trying to configure CVSup to download only ports but I've several doubts about it. I took /usr/share/examples/ports-supfile file. (freeBSD 6.0 RELEASE-i386) 1- When I update a specific port, only is updated his skeleton or his binary files are downloaded too? 2- For instance

Re: CVSup doubts

On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 07:38:34PM +0100, Efren Bravo wrote: Hi, I'm trying to configure CVSup to download only ports but I've several doubts about it. I took /usr/share/examples/ports-supfile file. (freeBSD 6.0 RELEASE-i386) 1- When I update a specific port, only is updated his

Re: error: portsdb and cvsup with refuse file

Peter wrote: With 5.4 I received an error using portsdb after updating my ports tree with a refuse file. How does one deal with this? # portsdb -U Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..p5-Unicode-MapUTF8-1.09: /usr/ports/japanese/p5-Jcode non-existent -- dependency

error: portsdb and cvsup with refuse file

-to-date ports collection. (INDEX builds are not supported with partial or out-of-date ports collections -- in particular, if you are using cvsup, you must cvsup the ports-all collection, and have no refuse files.) If that is the case, then report the failure to [EMAIL PROTECTED] together

Re: cvsup8.freebsd.org not updating (Re: RELENG_6 cvsup returns 6.0-RC1)

On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 18:33 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 12:30:32AM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 06:07:13PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 02:54:11PM -0800, Frank Jahnke wrote: I just ran a cvsup with a tag of RELENG_6

cvsup the wrong version???

Hello list, Two days ago, I cvsupped the RELENG_5_4 tag, and rebuilt the system using make buildworld, make buildkernel KERNCONF=mykernel, make installworld, make installkernel KERNCONF=mykernel. Before I started, I was at 5.4-RELEASE #2. Now that I've done this, I'm at 5.3-RELEASE #3.

Re: cvsup the wrong version???

-RELEASE #2. Now that I've done this, I'm at 5.3-RELEASE #3. How can this be? I verified my cvs-supfile, and everything is pointing to 5.4. I recently (yesterday) had a problem with cvsup8.us.freebsd.org. I was trying for RELENG_6 and it kept feeding me 6.0-RC1. I suggest trying another cvsup

CVSUP Issues FBSD 6.0

Hiya, I'm having a problem with newly installed system. cvsup -g L 2 supfile gives Release not specified for collection default with the supfile (based on standard-supfile) containing: default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org default base=/var/db default prefix=/usr default release=cvs default tag

Re: cvsup the wrong version???

feeding me 6.0-RC1. I suggest trying another cvsup server. -- Regards, Doug I've tried 3 of them so far... - Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks http://www.secure-computing.net ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http

Re: CVSUP Issues FBSD 6.0

At 2:09 PM + 11/12/05, Robert Slade wrote: Hiya, I'm having a problem with newly installed system. cvsup -g L 2 supfile gives Release not specified for collection default with the supfile (based on standard-supfile) containing: default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org default base=/var/db default

Re: CVSUP Issues FBSD 6.0

On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 14:30, Garance A Drosihn wrote: At 2:09 PM + 11/12/05, Robert Slade wrote: Hiya, I'm having a problem with newly installed system. cvsup -g L 2 supfile gives Release not specified for collection default with the supfile (based on standard-supfile) containing

Re: cvsup the wrong version???

On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 07:36:31AM -0600, Eric F Crist wrote: Hello list, Two days ago, I cvsupped the RELENG_5_4 tag, and rebuilt the system using make buildworld, make buildkernel KERNCONF=mykernel, make installworld, make installkernel KERNCONF=mykernel. Before I started, I was at

Re: cvsup the wrong version???

*default prefix=/var/db *default tag=RELENG_5_4 *default release=cvs *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all doc-all Same cvsup file I've always used... - Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks http://www.secure-computing.net

Re: cvsup the wrong version???

%more /root/cvs-supfile *default host=cvsup3.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/var/db *default tag=RELENG_5_4 *default release=cvs *default delete use-rel-suffix *default compress src-all doc-all Same cvsup file I've always used... ident /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh strings

RELENG_6 cvsup returns 6.0-RC1

Hello, I just ran a cvsup with a tag of RELENG_6 and rebuilt world/kernel. After installing kernel/world and subsequent reboot, I expected to see a kernel labeled: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE but am instead seeing: FreeBSD 6.0-RC1 I double-checked my supfile and my tag is indeed

Re: RELENG_6 cvsup returns 6.0-RC1

I just ran a cvsup with a tag of RELENG_6 and rebuilt world/kernel. After installing kernel/world and subsequent reboot, I expected to see a kernel labeled: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE but am instead seeing: FreeBSD 6.0-RC1 I double-checked my supfile and my tag is indeed RELENG_6

Re: RELENG_6 cvsup returns 6.0-RC1

On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 02:54:11PM -0800, Frank Jahnke wrote: I just ran a cvsup with a tag of RELENG_6 and rebuilt world/kernel. After installing kernel/world and subsequent reboot, I expected to see a kernel labeled: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE but am instead seeing

Re: RELENG_6 cvsup returns 6.0-RC1

On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 18:07 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: Set your tag to RELENG_6_0 and all will be well. No, that's the release branch. RELENG_6 indeed should work as he expects. Is anyone else able to confirm that this cvsup server is handing out old files? Kris I've read

Re: RELENG_6 cvsup returns 6.0-RC1

On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 15:09 -0800, Frank Jahnke wrote: I've read on other boards about the same issue (see http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?t=36432 ). When I upgraded from -RC1 to 6.0-RELEASE (by portupgrade) I used the tag I mentioned without issues. Sorry, that wasn't by

Re: RELENG_6 cvsup returns 6.0-RC1

that this cvsup server is handing out old files? Kris I've read on other boards about the same issue (see http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?t=36432 ). When I upgraded from -RC1 to 6.0-RELEASE (by portupgrade) I used the tag I mentioned without issues. OK, but you're still wrong

Re: RELENG_6 cvsup returns 6.0-RC1

On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 18:21 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: I've read on other boards about the same issue (see http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?t=36432 ). When I upgraded from -RC1 to 6.0-RELEASE (by portupgrade) I used the tag I mentioned without issues. OK, but you're

Re: RELENG_6 cvsup returns 6.0-RC1

On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 06:07:13PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 02:54:11PM -0800, Frank Jahnke wrote: I just ran a cvsup with a tag of RELENG_6 and rebuilt world/kernel. After installing kernel/world and subsequent reboot, I expected to see a kernel labeled

Re: RELENG_6 cvsup returns 6.0-RC1

. If it's indeed a cvsup server that stopped updating in the 6.0-RC1 timeframe, neither will work with that server (hence why I asked for confirmation), but the user wanted the latter, and you gave him the wrong branch tag. I also remember something in the release notes about this, I think... I

cvsup8.freebsd.org not updating (Re: RELENG_6 cvsup returns 6.0-RC1)

On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 12:30:32AM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 06:07:13PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 02:54:11PM -0800, Frank Jahnke wrote: I just ran a cvsup with a tag of RELENG_6 and rebuilt world/kernel. After installing kernel/world

Re: RELENG_6 cvsup returns 6.0-RC1

On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 18:32 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: You're trying to do something different: upgrade to 6.0-RELEASE+security patches instead of upgrade to 6.0-STABLE. If it's indeed a cvsup server that stopped updating in the 6.0-RC1 timeframe, neither will work with that server (hence

Re: RELENG_6 cvsup returns 6.0-RC1

On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:36:22PM -0800, Frank Jahnke wrote: On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 18:32 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: You're trying to do something different: upgrade to 6.0-RELEASE+security patches instead of upgrade to 6.0-STABLE. If it's indeed a cvsup server that stopped updating

Re: RELENG_6 cvsup returns 6.0-RC1

On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 12:30:32AM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 06:07:13PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 02:54:11PM -0800, Frank Jahnke wrote: I just ran a cvsup with a tag of RELENG_6 and rebuilt world/kernel. After installing kernel/world

Re: RELENG_6 cvsup returns 6.0-RC1

On 11/12/05 07:07 Kris Kennaway said the following: No, that's the release branch. RELENG_6 indeed should work as he expects. Is anyone else able to confirm that this cvsup server is handing out old files? a cvsup against RELENG_6 last saturday has resulted in the following for me, 1

Re: RELENG_6 cvsup returns 6.0-RC1

On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 01:57:59PM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote: On 11/12/05 07:07 Kris Kennaway said the following: No, that's the release branch. RELENG_6 indeed should work as he expects. Is anyone else able to confirm that this cvsup server is handing out old files? a cvsup against

Re: RELENG_6 cvsup returns 6.0-RC1

On 11/12/05 15:23 Kris Kennaway said the following: There is no /etc/defaults/make.conf any longer (it's in /usr/share/examples/etc now) ok, understandable. 2. pccardd not being built in a 'make buildworld' due to /usr/src/usr.sbin/pccard/Makefile not having pccardd in the SUBDIR And

Re: RELENG_6 cvsup returns 6.0-RC1

On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 03:49:05PM +0800, Dinesh Nair wrote: On 11/12/05 15:23 Kris Kennaway said the following: There is no /etc/defaults/make.conf any longer (it's in /usr/share/examples/etc now) ok, understandable. 2. pccardd not being built in a 'make buildworld' due to

Re: cvsup vs. portsnap (was Re: cvsup problem)

On Wednesday 09 November 2005 11:13, Kirk Strauser wrote: On Wednesday 09 November 2005 12:44, Kent Stewart wrote: If you aren't going to rebuild everything, every time you cvsup, don't do it. Out of curiosity, are 10 small cvsup sessions worse than 1 session with 10 times the changes

Re: cvsup vs. portsnap (was Re: cvsup problem)

On 11/9/05, Colin Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kirk Strauser wrote: On Wednesday 09 November 2005 12:44, Kent Stewart wrote: If you aren't going to rebuild everything, every time you cvsup, don't do it. Out of curiosity, are 10 small cvsup sessions worse than 1 session with 10

Re[2]: cvsup vs. portsnap (was Re: cvsup problem)

Szia Andrew, Thursday, November 10, 2005, 3:47:32 PM, you wrote: There are a couple more points against portsnap: - it lags behind by a few hours. Actually, even cvsup is behind by a few hours, if you are not syncing agains cvsup-master (to which only official cvsup mirrors have access

Re: cvsup vs. portsnap (was Re: cvsup problem)

On Thursday 10 November 2005 06:55 am, Daniel Gerzo wrote: Szia Andrew, Thursday, November 10, 2005, 3:47:32 PM, you wrote: There are a couple more points against portsnap: - it lags behind by a few hours. Actually, even cvsup is behind by a few hours, if you are not syncing agains cvsup

Re: cvsup vs. portsnap (was Re: cvsup problem)

Andrew P. wrote: There are a couple more points against portsnap: - it lags behind by a few hours. This is true (well, 1-2 hours). However, the reason for this is that portsnap builds ports INDEX files, and since portsnap is usually more up-to-date than the INDEX files fetched by make

Re: cvsup vs. portsnap (was Re: cvsup problem)

On 11/10/05, Colin Percival [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew P. wrote: There are a couple more points against portsnap: - it lags behind by a few hours. This is true (well, 1-2 hours). However, the reason for this is that portsnap builds ports INDEX files, and since portsnap is usually

cvsup problem

Hello All, I'm having a problem with cvsup on two of my machines. Both cvsup jobs were giving me errors saying TreeList failed: Network write failure: Connection closed. I googled this and found an entry saying that something went awry in the checkout files. SO I deleted the /var

Re: cvsup problem

On Wednesday 09 November 2005 10:59, Brian E. Conklin wrote: Parsing supfile /etc/ports-supfile Connecting to cvsup10.us.freebsd.org Why is everyone trying to using cvsup10 all of a sudden? I don't think I've ever made it past 5. -- Kirk Strauser pgp3ei2iLFrcq.pgp Description: PGP

Re: cvsup problem

I am against cvsuping src, ports, and doc at the same frequency. If you aren't going to rebuild everything, every time you cvsup, don't do it. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html ___ freebsd-questions

cvsup vs. portsnap (was Re: cvsup problem)

On Wednesday 09 November 2005 12:44, Kent Stewart wrote: If you aren't going to rebuild everything, every time you cvsup, don't do it. Out of curiosity, are 10 small cvsup sessions worse than 1 session with 10 times the changes? Anyway, I've fallen in love with portsnap. Is there any reason

Re: cvsup vs. portsnap (was Re: cvsup problem)

Kirk Strauser wrote: On Wednesday 09 November 2005 12:44, Kent Stewart wrote: If you aren't going to rebuild everything, every time you cvsup, don't do it. Out of curiosity, are 10 small cvsup sessions worse than 1 session with 10 times the changes? Yes. Each time you run CVSup

Re: cvsup problem

On Wednesday 09 November 2005 08:59, Brian E. Conklin wrote: Hello All, I'm having a problem with cvsup on two of my machines. Both cvsup jobs were giving me errors saying TreeList failed: Network write failure: Connection closed. I googled this and found an entry saying

cvsup mirror is failing

I went to update one of my machines today, and as a precaution, i checked the local cvsup mirro log. here's what I found: CVSup update begins at 2005-11-03 05:33:00 Updating from cvsup-master.freebsd.org Connected to cvsup-master.freebsd.org No record for server freefall.freebsd.org in /home

Re: cvsup mirror is failing

On Thursday 03 November 2005 12:10 pm, stan wrote: I went to update one of my machines today, and as a precaution, i checked the local cvsup mirro log. here's what I found: CVSup update begins at 2005-11-03 05:33:00 Updating from cvsup-master.freebsd.org Connected to cvsup

problem running cvsup-mirror on FreeBSd 6.X

Hi I am trying out the cvsup mirror program and thought I would laso give 6.X a whirl but I seem to have run into a bug? CVSup update begins at 2005-10-26 19:48:40 Updating from cvsup-master.freebsd.org Connected to cvsup-master.freebsd.org Authentication required, but could not open /home

Re: problem running cvsup-mirror on FreeBSd 6.X

Server Error: Authentication Fails. Any tips much appreciatted. I just want to setup my own CVS site so I can stop downloading multiple times from the nice mirror sites. Freefal is for public CVSUP servers that you are currently using. You cannot have access to it, unless running public

cvsup, mirrors and data integrity

So I have a cvsup mirror, set up with net/cvsup-mirror port. It was ok until the server crashed (all my fault, really) and fsck came up with all that soft-updates related stuff and what not. Anyway, cvsup-mirror seems to not have noticed the crash at all, but some clients cvsupping from

Re: cvsup, mirrors and data integrity

Andrew, cvsup is an application that deals with giving people files. It is the job of fsck to check and clear the FS. Check /etc/defaults/rc.conf and add the following variables to your rc.conf fsck_y_enable=YES background_fsck=NO It has been discussed zilion of times and it works. I recommend

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >