On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 07:13:11PM -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
I built FrfeeBSD 9 with
WITHOUT_CLANG=Yes
When I try to build the net/bwn-firmware-kmod/
I get an error that MK_CLANG_IS_CC is mis-formed.
If I define this in make.conf, I get an error that the user may not set
this.
On 06/01/12 00:00, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 07:13:11PM -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
I built FrfeeBSD 9 with
WITHOUT_CLANG=Yes
When I try to build the net/bwn-firmware-kmod/
I get an error that MK_CLANG_IS_CC is mis-formed.
If I define this in make.conf, I get an
I built FrfeeBSD 9 with
WITHOUT_CLANG=Yes
When I try to build the net/bwn-firmware-kmod/
I get an error that MK_CLANG_IS_CC is mis-formed.
If I define this in make.conf, I get an error that the user may not set
this.
If I use 'make MK_CLANG_IS_CC=no' the port compiles.
How do I fix this?
Various ports that depend on Perl are coming up with
the error in the subject when I try to upgrade them.
I've tried a portupgrade -fR [package] and even
portupgrade -fRra and it's not fixing the undefined
reference. I've cvsupped several times, including the
base system. I don't see anything
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 13:55:53 +0100 (CET)
Christian Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:37:33 + RW wrote:
There are two problems here. The first is that not all of the
underlying builds support this. The second is that we are using
Make as our ports scripting language
of the kde packages - but
only I think if make extract/patch/configure are run without -j
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of RW
Sent: 05 March 2007 21:21
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: compiling ports with more than one job
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 22:45:53 -
Thomas Sparrevohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There really two answers possible here -
1) Let's call it one depth e.g. make -j - Which works with some not
all ports - Nice when it works and I guess ports/Mk could hold a flag
2) Let's call it width - e.g. the
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:44:16 -0600 Josh Paetzel wrote:
The issues with the config screen sounds like a bug, but one that is
unlikely to get fixed any time soon. You can avoid it by doing a
make config-recursive before building the port, but you're still
going to run in to the problem that
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:07:24 -0500 Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Exactly right. However, you can get some parallel building by doing
more than one single-threaded build at the same time. This leads to
some danger of corrupting the database, though, so it's not for the
squeamish. I know that
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:37:33 + RW wrote:
There are two problems here. The first is that not all of the
underlying builds support this. The second is that we are using Make as
our ports scripting language - I'm guessing that in Gentoo no-one
expects portage itself to be parallel.
I
Good morning[1], folks!
I am currently setting up a Sun U60 with FreeBSD. A few amount of apps
will be installed on it, when I'm through with it. And that is where it
gets a little frustrating.
The packages for SPARC64 aren't really up to date. That is why using
them isn't really an option.
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 04:32, Christian Baer wrote:
Good morning[1], folks!
I am currently setting up a Sun U60 with FreeBSD. A few amount of
apps will be installed on it, when I'm through with it. And that is
where it gets a little frustrating.
The packages for SPARC64 aren't really
Josh Paetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wednesday 28 February 2007 04:32, Christian Baer wrote:
Good morning[1], folks!
I am currently setting up a Sun U60 with FreeBSD. A few amount of
apps will be installed on it, when I'm through with it. And that is
where it gets a little frustrating.
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:32:57 +0100 (CET)
Christian Baer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning[1], folks!
I am currently setting up a Sun U60 with FreeBSD. A few amount of apps
will be installed on it, when I'm through with it. And that is where
it gets a little frustrating.
The packages
Fri, 9 Jun 2006 00:39:42 -0500, Nikolas Britton wrote:
On 6/8/06, Andrey Slusar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:56:25 -0400, Dave wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if this was possible? I've got a box that i'd like
to install the latest gnome 2.14 desktop on, as well as some
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:56:25 -0400, Dave wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if this was possible? I've got a box that i'd like
to install the latest gnome 2.14 desktop on, as well as some very
intense apps to build. I would like to compile the needed apps on my
fastest machine as packages, then
system with cvsup...
Just a though... ;-)
--
Rafael Mentz Aquino
BSDServer Ltda.
Porto Alegre - RS
Brasil
51 - 9847 8825
-- Original Message ---
From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:56:25 -0400
Subject: compiling ports to packages
Dave wrote:
Hello,
Hi
I was wondering if this was possible? I've got a box that i'd like
to install the latest gnome 2.14 desktop on, as well as some very
intense apps to build. I would like to compile the needed apps on my
fastest machine as packages, then transfer all the packages to
On 6/8/06, Andrey Slusar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wed, 7 Jun 2006 16:56:25 -0400, Dave wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering if this was possible? I've got a box that i'd like
to install the latest gnome 2.14 desktop on, as well as some very
intense apps to build. I would like to compile the
Hello,
I was wondering if this was possible? I've got a box that i'd like to
install the latest gnome 2.14 desktop on, as well as some very intense apps
to build. I would like to compile the needed apps on my fastest machine as
packages, then transfer all the packages to the slower box, and
Am trying to get my head around the ports system, specifically custom options
when compiling. For example I would like to install apache 2.2 under it's own
dir in /usr/local, say /usr/local/apache22. If I was rolling my own version
using the configure script I would do:
./configure
On 1/5/06, Crispy Beef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am trying to get my head around the ports system, specifically custom options
when compiling. For example I would like to install apache 2.2 under it's own
dir in /usr/local, say /usr/local/apache22. If I was rolling my own version
using the
Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 1/5/06, Crispy Beef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am trying to get my head around the ports system, specifically custom options
when compiling. For example I would like to install apache 2.2 under it's own
dir in /usr/local, say /usr/local/apache22. If I was rolling
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 14:41:50 -0500
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/5/06, Crispy Beef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am trying to get my head around the ports system, specifically
custom options
when compiling. For example I would like to install apache 2.2
under it's own
dir in
JK wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 14:41:50 -0500
Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/5/06, Crispy Beef [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am trying to get my head around the ports system, specifically
custom options
when compiling. For example I would like to install apache 2.2
under it's
Are we gonig to start having problems installing ports on FreeBSD 4.9? I
can't get nmap to compile. Here's the error:
output.o(.gnu.linkonce.t.replace__t12basic_string3ZcZt18string_char_traits1ZcZt24__default_alloc_template2b0i0UiUiUic+0x28):
undefined reference to `__out_of_range(char const
Hey,
1)
I now use the pre-build ports and kernel. (4.9-Release)
What performance-gain do I obtain by building my own kernel and
compiling the ports ? (the system is a PIII 500 Mhz with 512 MB ram)
Does the extra work and efforts compare to the gain ?
2)
Installing Eclipse on my box drives me
: performance gain by compiling ports and kernel / java
issues
Hey,
1)
I now use the pre-build ports and kernel. (4.9-Release)
What performance-gain do I obtain by building my own kernel and
compiling the ports ? (the system is a PIII 500 Mhz with 512 MB ram)
Does the extra work and efforts compare
On Dec 10, 2003, at 8:12 AM, Bert Lagaisse wrote:
Hey,
1)
I now use the performance-gain do I obtain by building my own kernel
and compiling the ports ? (the system is a PIII 500 Mhz with 512 MB
ram)
Does the extra work and efforts compare to the gain ?
If you have a newer processor, there
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Adam McLaurin wrote:
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 10:04, Adam Bender wrote:
XFree86-4.2.0_1,1
There's your problem. Portupgrade to 4.3.x and try Xft and xscreensaver
again.
Hmm, I did the portupgrade (surprisingly quick, do I have to do anything
else?). Now I have
On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 10:04, Adam Bender wrote:
XFree86-4.2.0_1,1
There's your problem. Portupgrade to 4.3.x and try Xft and xscreensaver
again.
--
Adam McLaurin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Adam McLaurin wrote:
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 15:55, Adam Bender wrote:
OK, sorry to deluge the list with questions, but now I've having serious
problems compiling ports.
What version of XFree86 are you running?
XFree86-4.2.0_1,1
Thanks,
Adam
OK, sorry to deluge the list with questions, but now I've having serious
problems compiling ports.
Xfd won't compile:
=== Building for Xft-2.1.2
gmake all-am
gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/x11-fonts/Xft/work/xft-2.1.2'
source='xftdpy.c' object='xftdpy.lo' libtool=yes \
[...snip
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 15:55, Adam Bender wrote:
OK, sorry to deluge the list with questions, but now I've having serious
problems compiling ports.
What version of XFree86 are you running?
--
Adam McLaurin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, Aug 30, 2003 at 03:55:57PM -0400 or thereabouts, Adam Bender wrote:
[ ... ]
I then wanted to use portupgrade, which installs:
# uname -a
FreeBSD 68.162.128.185 4.7-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE #1: Sat Nov 16
20:36:05 EST 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/compile/adam
i386#
35 matches
Mail list logo
