On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 05:06:37PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would appreciate any suggestions for a reasonably secure solution. I
just found all this out and am totally blank.
Have a look at OpenVPN (http://www.openvpn.org/), it is available as a
FreeBSD port and it comes with a
Quoting Martin Welk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 05:06:37PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would appreciate any suggestions for a reasonably secure solution. I
just found all this out and am totally blank.
Have a look at OpenVPN (http://www.openvpn.org/), it is available
I have three clients behind my FreeBSD gateway/firewall. Two of the clients run
FreeBSD and the other
runs FreeBSD and Windows. I would like for my firewall to be fairly tight,
disallowing unspecified
connections outbound. However, while I have no trouble getting most services up
and running
I installed a FreeBSD6.0 server/firewall for a remote customer about a
week ago. Today they told me that on there LAN they had a Unix box
that runs their internal ascii based accounting system that they have
been accessing by modem from home. Now they want to access it over the
Internet
Quoting Gayn Winters [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 3:07 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: A secure connection to an SCO Unix 5.2 behind a pf firewall
Hello list...
I have a few questions I would like to ask. Some may sound stupid, but
please bear with me since I'm new to FreeBSD and networking for that
matter...
So, I'm trying to build this router/firewall thingy for our local
network. The box has 3 NIC's, one for the Internet and two
buffer write
cycle time.
How do tell PF in rc.conf these over ride options??
-Original Message-
From: Hornet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 8:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
Subject: Re: PF firewall log problems
On 7/7/05
On 2005-07-06 21:34, fbsd_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the OpenBSD Packet Filter firewall have stateless rules?
Yes.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
How can I change the default wait time for PF buffer writes to the log file?
The log records are being held in the buffers for a long time before being
written out.
I want to change this to a shorter time.
Are there any tools or ports for use on the PF log file to create better
standardized
On 7/7/05, fbsd_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I change the default wait time for PF buffer writes to the log file?
The log records are being held in the buffers for a long time before being
written out.
I want to change this to a shorter time.
How are you viewing the data?
Realtime
these over ride options??
-Original Message-
From: Hornet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 8:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
Subject: Re: PF firewall log problems
On 7/7/05, fbsd_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I change the default wait time
Does the OpenBSD Packet Filter firewall have stateless rules?
Meaning, if I coded a rule to pass in for port 23 without any of the
different state options coded,
do I also have to code the same kind of rule to allow that port 23 packet
back out like in IPFW.
Or is there no stateless rules in PF
, ftp). The problem is that at the moment when I
activate one-to-one nat on my hardware firewall for this machine, the
services stop working and behave strangely (for example, if I connect to
the box using ssh, it prompts for the login and nothing else happens,
ftp doesn't work either). If I try
On 7/5/05, Roman Kouzmenko wrote:
...
Now I need to put it on the Internet, so that the developers can take
control over it (ssh, ftp). The problem is that at the moment when I
activate one-to-one nat on my hardware firewall for this machine, the
services stop working and behave strangely
I am running 5.4 using the run time loadable module for PF firewall.
The PF rules load and work fine.
The main rule set contains 2 anchor rules.
I can add rules to the in core anchor name and then list the anchor
and see the rules are really there.
Problem is the anchor rules are never being
I am running 5.4 using the run time loadable module for PF firewall.
The PF rules load and work fine.
The main rule set contains 2 anchor rules.
I can add rules to the in core anchor name and then list the anchor
and see the rules are really there.
Problem is the anchor rules are never being
--On June 26, 2005 12:40:14 AM +0100 Alex Zbyslaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On June 25, 2005 8:42:24 AM +0200 mess-mate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've a firewall/router/proxy with openbsd and think to replace it
with freebsd 5.4
Do you mean freebsd's PF don't support
Hi
I'm searching for a CDROM firewall package FreeBSD based
I know there is several but I can't remember their names.
Thanks a lot.
--
Cordialement/Regards
Frank Bonnet
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 10:55:42AM +0200 or thereabouts, Frank Bonnet wrote:
Hi
I'm searching for a CDROM firewall package FreeBSD based
I know there is several but I can't remember their names.
It is called m0n0wall, it is based on FreeBSD 4.x.
Go and grab it from:
http
* Paul Schmehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-06-24 12:58:51 -0500]:
I've been using pf for a few years now, and I've never had problems
understanding the syntax or how it works (but I also never do NAT, so
that might be the reason it seems easy to me.)
Yes, pf is great, but doing NAT with pf is also
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2005-06-26 00:40, Alex Zbyslaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Schmehl wrote:
pf on freebsd does support the quick keyword. The default
firewall, ipfw, does not.
This makes no sense to me. The two firewalls work very differently.
[...]
You
On 2005-06-26 22:15, Alex Zbyslaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2005-06-26 00:40, Alex Zbyslaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pf on freebsd does support the quick keyword. The default
firewall, ipfw, does not.
This makes no sense to me. The two firewalls work very
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Khanh Cao
Van
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 9:33 AM
To: freebsd-questions
Subject: firewall on freebsd
I'm going to learn about the freebsd firewall . In the handbook list
some of them and I could
...snip...
|
| Personally, I like the quick keyword of the OpenBSD firewall, (but not
enough to bother
| installing it.)
|
| Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
I've a firewall/router/proxy with openbsd and think to replace it
with freebsd 5.4
Do you mean freebsd's PF don't support the 'quick
On Sat, Jun 25, 2005 at 08:42:24AM +0200, mess-mate wrote:
I've a firewall/router/proxy with openbsd and think to replace it
with freebsd 5.4
Do you mean freebsd's PF don't support the 'quick' keyword ??
Thought PF on freebsd and openbsd was identical, isn't ?
I don't know if they're
mess-mate wrote:
I've a firewall/router/proxy with openbsd and think to replace it
with freebsd 5.4
Do you mean freebsd's PF don't support the 'quick' keyword ??
Thought PF on freebsd and openbsd was identical, isn't ?
It's a port, pf on FBSD 5.4 is the same as pf on OBSD 3.6, AFAIK. So
On Saturday 25 June 2005 05:19 am, Erik Nørgaard wrote:
mess-mate wrote:
I've a firewall/router/proxy with openbsd and think to replace it
with freebsd 5.4
Do you mean freebsd's PF don't support the 'quick' keyword ??
Thought PF on freebsd and openbsd was identical, isn't ?
It's a port
Andrew L. Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Saturday 25 June 2005 05:19 am, Erik Nørgaard wrote:
| mess-mate wrote:
| I've a firewall/router/proxy with openbsd and think to replace it
| with freebsd 5.4
| Do you mean freebsd's PF don't support the 'quick' keyword ??
| Thought PF
--On June 25, 2005 8:42:24 AM +0200 mess-mate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've a firewall/router/proxy with openbsd and think to replace it
with freebsd 5.4
Do you mean freebsd's PF don't support the 'quick' keyword ??
Thought PF on freebsd and openbsd was identical, isn't ?
pf on freebsd does
Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On June 25, 2005 8:42:24 AM +0200 mess-mate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've a firewall/router/proxy with openbsd and think to replace it
with freebsd 5.4
Do you mean freebsd's PF don't support the 'quick' keyword ??
Thought PF on freebsd and openbsd was identical, isn't
On 2005-06-26 00:40, Alex Zbyslaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Schmehl wrote:
pf on freebsd does support the quick keyword. The default
firewall, ipfw, does not.
This makes no sense to me. The two firewalls work very differently.
In pf, each rule is always processed on every packet
I'm going to learn about the freebsd firewall . In the handbook list
some of them and I could not find out what is the best . So I decided
to post here hoping to gain some of your opinion and experience .
I would like to know what firewall was the most wanted ? I have used
Linux several months
Which firewall you select to use should be based on your level of
understanding of how information is moved across the internet.
Ipfilter is best suited for people who are just learning about
firewalling. PF is a little more automated and the rules are very
close to IPF's.
IPFW is for the advanced
On June 24, 2005 09:33 am, Khanh Cao Van wrote:
I'm going to learn about the freebsd firewall . In the handbook list
some of them and I could not find out what is the best . So I decided
to post here hoping to gain some of your opinion and experience .
I would like to know what firewall
in-kernel.
The OpenBSD packet filter is known as pf, not ipf. It exists in FreeBSD as
pf.
I have to say that I find it has some very useful features, though they are
outside the mainstream firewall feature set. For instance, authpf. When you
log into the firewall (usually via ssh
I see rule numbers in the pf.log file but can not find any way to list the
incore rules with their internal rule numbers.
Is there a way to list the incore PF rules with rule numbers?
Can a pf rule be inserted into the incore rules after or before a selected
rule?
Subject: firewall on freebsd
I'm going to learn about the freebsd firewall . In the handbook list
some of them and I could not find out what is the best . So I decided to
post here hoping to gain some of your opinion and experience .
I would like to know what firewall was the most wanted ? I have
On 2005-06-24 13:08, fbsd_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see rule numbers in the pf.log file but can not find any way to list the
incore rules with their internal rule numbers.
Is there a way to list the incore PF rules with rule numbers?
# pfctl -vv -sr
The double -v option *is*
On 2005-06-24 10:31, fbsd_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which firewall you select to use should be based on your level of
understanding of how information is moved across the internet.
Ipfilter is best suited for people who are just learning about
firewalling. PF is a little more automated
On 2005-06-24 10:59, Ean Kingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For anyone who wants to start the in-kernel vs user-land NAT argument,
I've already been through it and there are valid arguments for both
sides. So, I won't get into it again.
Agreed. Most of the people who use FreeBSD in SOHO
--On June 24, 2005 5:31:13 PM +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 24 June 2005 15:31, fbsd_user wrote:
Which firewall you select to use should be based on your level of
understanding of how information is moved across the internet.
Ipfilter is best suited for people who are just learning
doesn't fit.
Does anyone know if the freebsd firewall will support two USB WAN connections
to a normal LAN internal network?
USB is irrelevant; you need to consider what kind of USB devices you
using to connect. Having more than one external interface is not by
itself a problem
Hi,
USB is not totally irrelevant, since it means I can't connect my
firewall/router directly to my input, but I take your point.
I will have USB connections to my ISDN upload and my satellite decoder, my
question was more whether freebsd firewall supports USB devices in principle
firewall will support two USB WAN connections
to a normal LAN internal network?
John
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hopefully you'll find this link helpful:
http://www.defcon1.org/html/Networking_Articles/Firewall-Ipfw/firewall-ipfw.html.
--
Dmitry
yep, I did begin with that, but was not liking the fact that it was an
exclusive firewall (the end rule is to accept anything) rather than
an inclusive one
and setting up FreeBSD 5.x
with transparent proxy and firewall and there simply is no easy way
explaining to beginners how to do such a setup.
1) Before you start playing around with squid and firewall you
have to make sure your FreeBSD box works as a gateway.
2) When this is done
and firewall and there simply is no easy way
explaining to beginners how to do such a setup.
1) Before you start playing around with squid and firewall you
have to make sure your FreeBSD box works as a gateway.
2) When this is done look into google for setup of squid as a
transparent
FreeBSD 5.x
with transparent proxy and firewall and there simply is no easy way
explaining to beginners how to do such a setup.
1) Before you start playing around with squid and firewall you
have to make sure your FreeBSD box works as a gateway.
2) When this is done look into google for setup
There exists a very simple way to activate a firewall in freebsd:
# /stand/sysinstall
will open FreeBSD's installation menu.
- Configure - Security - Security Profile gives you two
options for standard firewalls.
Actually, doing this on 5.4R I just have:
Secure Level
NFS Port
Anyway, would
Hi,
Is there a stateful packet filtering/firewall/address translation node type
for netgraph or the project of one?
Thanks
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
Hello all!
I have a small network at home which I am upgrading speedwise, i.e. I am
about to go from 8 Mbit to 24 Mbit (ADSL2) on the WAN side. I intend then
to use my FreeBSD 5.3 box as a firewall/NAT/proxy server.
Two questions:
First, the big one: I sometimes work from home. Then I connect
Per B wrote:
Second question: someone told me that the ZyXEL cannot handle 24 Mbit,
therefor I want to use the FreeBSD box instead. Can FreeBSD handle 24Mbit
from the ADSL modem? I think it can, anyone against? ;-)
We're using a FreeBSD 5.3 machine with pf and AltQ as our
firewall/gateway/nat
Is there any way to do session limiting in ipfw? I can limit connections
between any specific src and dst easy...what I'd like to do is just
(either by some standard I don't get, or dynamic rules) limit between ANY
given hosts
Does anyone know a way of doing this?
-Dan Mahoney
--
It doesn't
Dick
Since you say you have lime ware working on your LAN behind firewall
why don't you post your rules so we can see how you did it.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dick
Hoogendijk
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 5:26 PM
To: freebsd-questions
Hi all.
I've installed the smssend program a few days back,
it's a greate piece of software. However I wasn't able
up till now to find out the TCP port number that it
uses, in order to enable it with IPFilter. Does anyone
have an idea?
Thanks in advance.
Dont let the bugs in, close the
Subject: smssend/firewall port
Hi all.
I've installed the smssend program a few days back,
it's a greate piece of software. However I wasn't able
up till now to find out the TCP port number that it
uses, in order to enable it with IPFilter. Does anyone
have an idea?
Thanks in advance.
Dont let
On Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:43:23 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dick
Since you say you have limewire working on your LAN behind firewall
why don't you post your rules so we can see how you did it.
# Limewire
pass out quick on rl0 proto tcp from any to any port = 6346 flags S keep
state
pass out
. Or have friend using limewire try to access your shared files
on one of your lan pc's.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of dick
hoogendijk
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2005 4:46 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: IPF Firewall Rules
We have a freebsd gateway server for windows clients. We use IPF with nat.
What ipf rules and ipnat rules are required on the gateway for
Limewire peer-to-peer to connect on the clients.
If you can help, please do... i'm doing something wrong!
Thanks
Gareth
,
and the freeBSD gateway. The external connection from the gateway runs
upstairs into the block's router, which is connected to an ADSL router
(no static IP).
Thanks for your help!
Gareth
On Apr 8, 2005 2:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Read the official FreeBSD handbook firewall section
that. This is a common problem with products
such as this. This is not an firewall problem. It's a design error
in the products internet communications exchange of session packets.
It's just not designed to work on PC that is on a LAN.
To use this product your XP box has to be connected
On 08 Apr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you read the limewire website carefully you will see that no where
does it say it will work on PC on a local area network (LAN). This is
one of those products that buries the sending IP address in the
packets. A PC on the LAN uses an NATed ip address and
can u guys tell me , is there any ipfw firewall i can
subscribe to to learn it or ask daily usage questions
to ?
thanks
*º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨¨*¤ Allah-hu-Akber*º¤., ¸¸,.¤º*¨¨*¤
God is the Greatest
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam
On 2005-04-06 08:53, faisal gillani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
can u guys tell me , is there any ipfw firewall i can subscribe to to
learn it or ask daily usage questions to ?
The freebsd-questions list is the best place to ask about configuration
details of ipfw. There is a freebsd-ipfw mailing
23, 2005 1:03 PM, Ean Kingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been looking for a great firewall, something
not too technical, since I have only been using
FreeBSD for two months now.
I have FreeBSD-4.8 installed, Apache-1.3, and
Netqmail-1.05. I am also planning on running an NTP
.
Wow, I stand corrected. The last time I talked to Darren (years ago) he
said IPFilter would never run on Linux. I guess the Linux folks fixed
whatever was vexing him about their architecture.
On Mar 23, 2005 1:03 PM, Ean Kingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been looking for a great firewall
I have been looking for a great firewall, something
not too technical, since I have only been using
FreeBSD for two months now.
I have FreeBSD-4.8 installed, Apache-1.3, and
Netqmail-1.05. I am also planning on running an NTP
time server and possibly a forum in the future. The
web site
I have been looking for a great firewall, something
not too technical, since I have only been using
FreeBSD for two months now.
I have FreeBSD-4.8 installed, Apache-1.3, and
Netqmail-1.05. I am also planning on running an NTP
time server and possibly a forum in the future. The
web site
)
Subject: Firewall questions
I have been looking for a great firewall, something
not too technical, since I have only been using
FreeBSD for two months now.
I have FreeBSD-4.8 installed, Apache-1.3, and
Netqmail-1.05. I am also planning on running an NTP
time server and possibly a forum
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Shawn B
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 3:47 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Firewall questions
I have been looking for a great firewall, something
not too technical, since I have only been using
FreeBSD for two
http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/fbsd_installguide/index.php
This install guide covers both of the 2 firewalls that come built in
to FreeBSD for all 4.x release. Software firewalls are heads and
shoulders above hardware firewalls which can not do stateful type of
protection.
You might want
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 21:03, Ean Kingston wrote:
Also, I am looking for antiviral protection for both
the FreeBSD server, and any Windows or Macintosh
systems that may be using the POP mail. I know qmail
has one solution, which was contributed by a qmail
user, but what are the
--On Wednesday, March 23, 2005 09:45:56 PM + RW
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Clamav is supposed to be good for filtering windows viruses out of email.
I know Fastmail.fm dropped Kaspersky in favour of Clamav, they claimed
the updates to be at least as good.
We did some pretty thorough testing
Hi:
I am trying to set up a router/firewall with Freebsd 5.3 this is my
information:
Winxp and Freebsd machine connected to Firewall machine using a hub
Firewall has two ethernet cards: card1: dc0 connected to cable internet
using DHCP
card 2
This is covered in detail at
http://www.unixguide.net/freebsd/fbsd_installguide/index.php
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Aperez
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 3:19 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Router/Firewall?
Hi:
I am
Aperez wrote:
Hi:
I am trying to set up a router/firewall with Freebsd 5.3 this is my
information:
Winxp and Freebsd machine connected to Firewall machine using a hub
Firewall has two ethernet cards: card1: dc0 connected to cable internet
using DHCP
[please cc freebsd-questions, someone may be interested, too]
Aperez wrote:
Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
Aperez wrote:
Hi:
I am trying to set up a router/firewall with Freebsd 5.3 this is my
information:
Winxp and Freebsd machine connected to Firewall machine using a hub
Firewall has
Hi,
I set up a firewall in my freebsd box using ipfw.conf and its working
fine.
I'm running on my firewall ( i know its not recommended ) smtp server
and all my services is working fine but smtp is not receiving incomming
connections from outside(internet).
I would like to show my ipfw rules
Hello list,
I'm trying to get FTPD working, but I think I'm not opening the correct
ports for it in my firewall. I've got 20 and 21 open, and I get the
login prompt and such, but only after a 10 to 20 second delay. After
that, everything seems to work fine, until I try to upload
Eric F Crist wrote:
Hello list,
I'm trying to get FTPD working, but I think I'm not opening the correct
ports for it in my firewall. I've got 20 and 21 open, and I get the
login prompt and such, but only after a 10 to 20 second delay. After
that, everything seems to work fine, until I try
, David Wassman wrote:
# static address for internal interface
ifconfig_xe0=inet 223.147.37.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast
223.147.37.255
This is a valid IP address, not one of the three sets of IP numbers
reserved for internal networks (you use one, 172.x.x.x, in your
firewall script
. Is this
possible? I know you can do it with a wired network through nat but am
not sure about the wireless in the middle.
2)I have setup the computer A as a router with a firewall and NAT. I can
access to web from it through the wireless link but cannot ping out from
C behind it.
The net hardware:
I
Greetings,
I have had a Freebsd firewall (Older computer with (1) 3com 10Mb
ethernet PCI card, and (1) 3 com 10/100 Mb ethernet PCI card).
The firewall croaked on me (motherboard died). As a quick fix,
I plugged in a Linksys BEFSX41.
My Question is, should I build a new Freebsd firewall
DH Greetings,
DH I have had a Freebsd firewall (Older computer with (1) 3com 10Mb
DH ethernet PCI card, and (1) 3 com 10/100 Mb ethernet PCI card).
DH The firewall croaked on me (motherboard died). As a quick fix,
DH I plugged in a Linksys BEFSX41.
DH My Question is, should I build a new
Darryl Hoar wrote:
Greetings,
I have had a Freebsd firewall (Older computer with (1) 3com 10Mb
ethernet PCI card, and (1) 3 com 10/100 Mb ethernet PCI card).
The firewall croaked on me (motherboard died). As a quick fix,
I plugged in a Linksys BEFSX41.
My Question is, should I build a new
Darryl Hoar wrote:
Greetings,
I have had a Freebsd firewall (Older computer with (1) 3com 10Mb
ethernet PCI card, and (1) 3 com 10/100 Mb ethernet PCI card).
The firewall croaked on me (motherboard died). As a quick fix,
I plugged in a Linksys BEFSX41.
My Question is, should I build a new
that could work. Just have to work out your firewall
rules.
I use 2 types of dns, one for internal use, and the other for external.
My 0,2 cents
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hodgins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 4:06 PM
To: Gelsema, Patrick
Hello dear list,
I have one FreeBSD router in front of the internal network. Now I've
installed another FreeBSD box which must be the www sever.
I've managed to redirect the port 80 at the router and the web server
is visible to the outside world. But the problem is now at the other
internal
Hi,
IN order to enlighten you we need some more information. Sounds to me you
could be having issues with internal/external DNS and ip-addresses. In
other words, you are querying your www server from a dns and is getting
the Internet ip back instead of the lan ip. Can you connect to your www
Hello dear list,
I have one FreeBSD router in front of the internal network. Now I've
installed another FreeBSD box which must be the www sever.
I've managed to redirect the port 80 at the router and the web server
is visible to the outside world. But the problem is now at the other
,
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Cristian Salan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 1:51 PM
To: Gelsema, Patrick
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: natd or firewall problem?
Hello dear list,
I have one FreeBSD router in front
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 13:54:23 +0100, Gelsema, Patrick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thats right, you can do the following:
Put the ip-address with its FQDn (www.webserverwhatever.com) in every hosts
file (taken its windows) or in its hosts file on freebsd. Or you run an
internal DNS with an internal
Gelsema, Patrick wrote:
Thats right, you can do the following:
Put the ip-address with its FQDn (www.webserverwhatever.com) in every hosts
file (taken its windows) or in its hosts file on freebsd. Or you run an
internal DNS with an internal zone for your domain whilst running on the
internet the
Hello,
I am a UNIX/FreeBSD-5.3-RELEASE newbie. I have posted several
times to freebsd-newbies, but I think this question will get better
reception here. I have installed Free-BSD-5.3-RELEASE full base
installation with X. I am currently trying to configure my firewall. I
have followed
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 09:32:31AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Allow out access to my ISP's DHCP server for cable or DSL
networks.
# This rule is not needed for 'user ppp' type connection to the
# public Internet, so you can delete this whole group.
# Use the following rule and
Hello:
I am trying to set up a FreeBSD 5.3 firewall. I have an old P I with 64
KB of memory. When I try to install FreeBSD, the PC hangs just after
showing the deamon screen and showes the following message:
stack overflow
I am thinking maybe the PC is too old for FreeBSD because I managed
Kevin A. Pieckiel wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 08:41:07AM -0500, Aperez wrote:
Hello:
I am trying to set up a FreeBSD 5.3 firewall. I have an old P I with 64
KB of memory. When I try to install FreeBSD, the PC hangs just after
showing the deamon screen and showes the following message
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 09:41:07AM -0500, Kevin A. Pieckiel wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 09:22:09AM -0500, Aperez wrote:
Yes, I am sorry I made a mistake. I meant 64 MB
Any idea what is the problem?
It's possible that it's faulty hardware. A system that old could very
well have its
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 09:22:09AM -0500, Aperez wrote:
Yes, I am sorry I made a mistake. I meant 64 MB
Any idea what is the problem?
It's possible that it's faulty hardware. A system that old could very
well have its share of problems. You may try replacing the RAM,
removing cards--things
John wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 09:41:07AM -0500, Kevin A. Pieckiel wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 09:22:09AM -0500, Aperez wrote:
Yes, I am sorry I made a mistake. I meant 64 MB
Any idea what is the problem?
It's possible that it's faulty hardware. A system that old could very
well have its
501 - 600 of 1122 matches
Mail list logo
