Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
Sounds like you might have a corrupted installation. Did you
verify the MD5 checksum on the ISO images?
This is completely off topic but MD5 is not secure:
http://www.infosec.sdu.edu.cn/paper/md5-attack.pdf
Similar weaknesses have been found in the entire MD/SHA
On 11/14/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Staudinger wrote:
I wasn't sure if -questions or -current was the right group, but I
searched
both before posting.
I'm trying to begin testing FreeBSD-7.0-Beta2, and I have a mixture of
Intel
and AMD-based machines that I work
Mark Staudinger wrote:
On 11/14/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Staudinger wrote:
I wasn't sure if -questions or -current was the right group, but I
searched
both before posting.
I'm trying to begin testing FreeBSD-7.0-Beta2, and I have a mixture of
Intel
and AMD-based
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sounds like you might have a corrupted installation. Did you
verify the MD5 checksum on the ISO images?
This is completely off topic but MD5 is not secure:
http://www.infosec.sdu.edu.cn/paper/md5-attack.pdf
Similar weaknesses have been found in
Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sounds like you might have a corrupted installation. Did you
verify the MD5 checksum on the ISO images?
This is completely off topic but MD5 is not secure:
http://www.infosec.sdu.edu.cn/paper/md5-attack.pdf
Similar
Mark Staudinger wrote:
I wasn't sure if -questions or -current was the right group, but I searched
both before posting.
I'm trying to begin testing FreeBSD-7.0-Beta2, and I have a mixture of Intel
and AMD-based machines that I work with.
I'm using the i386 release. I've previously used
I wasn't sure if -questions or -current was the right group, but I searched
both before posting.
I'm trying to begin testing FreeBSD-7.0-Beta2, and I have a mixture of Intel
and AMD-based machines that I work with.
I'm using the i386 release. I've previously used FreeBSD-4.9R and 6.2R for
i386
