FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD

2006-11-26 Thread John Smith
Hello, What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE? I would like to hear from somone who tested both on FreeBSD 6.2 B to RC1 Thank you, -J ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD

2006-11-26 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 11/26/06, John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE? The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless you're a developer willing to fix some outstanding issues and maybe take active maintainership of it. You can try it just for

Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD

2006-11-26 Thread John Smith
On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/26/06, John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE? The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless you're a developer willing to fix some outstanding issues and maybe

Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD

2006-11-26 Thread RW
On Sunday 26 November 2006 12:18, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: On 11/26/06, John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE? The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless you're a developer willing to fix some outstanding issues and

Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD

2006-11-26 Thread Andrew Pantyukhin
On 11/26/06, John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/26/06, John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE? The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless you're a

Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD

2006-11-26 Thread perikillo
On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/26/06, John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/26/06, John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE? The

Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD

2006-11-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 07:32:13PM +0300, John Smith wrote: On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/26/06, John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE? The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless

Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD

2006-11-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 05:06:57PM +, RW wrote: On Sunday 26 November 2006 12:18, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: On 11/26/06, John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE? The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless

Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD

2006-11-26 Thread RW
On Sunday 26 November 2006 19:43, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 05:06:57PM +, RW wrote: On Sunday 26 November 2006 12:18, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: On 11/26/06, John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE?

Re: FreeBSD 6.2: ULE vs 4BSD

2006-11-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 12:13:43AM +, RW wrote: On Sunday 26 November 2006 19:43, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 05:06:57PM +, RW wrote: On Sunday 26 November 2006 12:18, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: On 11/26/06, John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello,