Thanks for the answer. I just hope I'm not messing things too much.
So if a port may override a package, is the only solution to this
generate a package then install it? Now if this happens, what will
happen for example (supposing I install everything from packages - or
make package then pkg_add
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 09:57:49 -0300
Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the answer. I just hope I'm not messing things too much.
np :)
So if a port may override a package,
a port and a package are the same thing, in a different form :). the
tree structure under
Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont wrote:
Thanks for the answer. I just hope I'm not messing things too much.
So if a port may override a package, is the only solution to this
generate a package then install it? Now if this happens, what will
happen for example (supposing I install everything from
On Monday 27 March 2006 14:20, Norberto Meijome wrote:
make package will actually make the package and install it for you, you
dont need to do a pkg_add after that (yes, a bit counter-intuitive, but
really handy)
Make package creates a package out of an installed port (it will install the
On Monday 27 March 2006 09:26, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Luiz Eduardo Guida Valmont wrote:
Thanks for the answer. I just hope I'm not messing things too much.
So if a port may override a package, is the only solution to this
generate a package then install it? Now if this happens, what will
On Monday 27 March 2006 09:49, RW wrote:
On Monday 27 March 2006 14:20, Norberto Meijome wrote:
make package will actually make the package and install it for you,
you dont need to do a pkg_add after that (yes, a bit
counter-intuitive, but really handy)
Make package creates a package out
On Monday 27 March 2006 17:02, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Monday 27 March 2006 09:49, RW wrote:
On Monday 27 March 2006 14:20, Norberto Meijome wrote:
make package will actually make the package and install it for you,
you dont need to do a pkg_add after that (yes, a bit
