On Monday 17 May 2004 06:17, Phil Thomson wrote:
Hi all,
I am a relative newbie to UNIX, going from being an ex-Windows user
to being an X Windows user! ;-) I recently got FreeBSD installed on
an older PC with a 3 GB drive and a 5 GB drive (which has not yet
been mounted). The system is
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 01:21:44PM +0200, platanthera typed:
On Monday 17 May 2004 06:17, Phil Thomson wrote:
Hi all,
I am a relative newbie to UNIX, going from being an ex-Windows user
to being an X Windows user! ;-) I recently got FreeBSD installed on
an older PC with a 3 GB drive and
On Monday 17 May 2004 14:41, Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 01:21:44PM +0200, platanthera typed:
On Monday 17 May 2004 06:17, Phil Thomson wrote:
Hi all,
I am a relative newbie to UNIX, going from being an ex-Windows
user to being an X Windows user! ;-) I recently got
platanthera writes:
you could (and definitely should) have a separate slice for /tmp
and eventually another one for /home too.
May I ask your logic here? Is this about safety, convenience,
overcrowding?
Robert Huff
On Monday 17 May 2004 17:07, Robert Huff wrote:
platanthera writes:
you could (and definitely should) have a separate slice for /tmp
and eventually another one for /home too.
May I ask your logic here? Is this about safety, convenience,
overcrowding?
You noticed that I accidently
Phil Thomson writes:
/dev/ad0s1a 260M 254M -15.3M 106%/
I'm not sure what you've done, but you have _way_ too much
stuff in /. For comparison, my 5.x system:
/dev/da0s1a484M118M327M27%/
Can we please see the output of
du | sort -nr |
On Sun, 16 May 2004, Phil Thomson wrote:
Hi all,
I am a relative newbie to UNIX, going from being an ex-Windows user to
being an X Windows user! ;-) I recently got FreeBSD installed on an older
PC with a 3 GB drive and a 5 GB drive (which has not yet been mounted).
The system is installed
