[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ifconfig -a
lnc0: flags=108843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST,NEEDSGIANT
mtu 1500
inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fec4:3bd3%lnc0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
inet 172.16.21.62 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 172.16.21.255
ether 00:0c:29:c4:3b:d3
lnc1:
On Thursday 11 January 2007 19:01, Patrick Dung wrote:
Hi
Suppose I have mistype a command:
# route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.1
There is a strange routing table and I am unable to remove it unless
reboot:
192.168.00xc0a80301 255.255.255.0 UGS 0 86
Thanks Nikos for reply
I have figure out how to remove that route
It was consider 192.168.3.0 as host instead of net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.1
add net 192.168.3.0: gateway 255.255.255.0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# route delete -net 192.168.3.0
route: writing
i did this once too! the quickest way to fix the problem is:
/etc/rc.d/routing restart
-g
On 11/01/07, Patrick Dung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Suppose I have mistype a command:
# route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.1
There is a strange routing table and I am unable to remove it
Hi
Suppose I have mistype a command:
# route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.1
There is a strange routing table and I am unable to remove it unless
reboot:
192.168.00xc0a80301 255.255.255.0 UGS 0 86 fxp0
Any ideas?
Hi
Suppose I have mistype a command:
# route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.1
There is a strange routing table and I am unable to remove it unless
reboot:
192.168.00xc0a80301 255.255.255.0 UGS 0 86 fxp0
Any ideas?
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:01:14 -0800 (PST)
Patrick Dung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Suppose I have mistype a command:
# route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.1
What is the output of netstat -nrf inet ?
Does route delete 192.168.3.0 help?
Armin
--
PUBBOX Postmaster + spam-killer,
Patrick Dung wrote:
Suppose I have mistype a command:
# route add 192.168.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.1
So you swapped gateway and netmask. Nasty mistake. :-)
It's usually better to use CIDR notation (with a slash
followed by the number of network bits), to avoid any
confusion. It's also
