Hi folks,
I'm experiencing a problem when I try to install FreeBSD on a Virtual
Server using KVM,
The first part of the installation was fine but after setting all the
option (I use a custom installation of FreeBSD)
the installation encounter an error :
Write failure on transfer! (wrote -1
Georghy a écrit :
Hi folks,
I'm experiencing a problem when I try to install FreeBSD on a Virtual
Server using KVM,
The first part of the installation was fine but after setting all the
option (I use a custom installation of FreeBSD)
the installation encounter an error :
Write failure
I would like to make my configuration management system update and/or
install packages on FreeBSD. I've been avoiding that little thorn
because I haven't had very many hosts and updates have been fairly
rare recently; but no more. (cfengine2)
Basically, I wish pkg_add would upgrade a package
On Wednesday 21 April 2010 18:06:23 Atom Powers wrote:
I would like to make my configuration management system update and/or
install packages on FreeBSD. I've been avoiding that little thorn
because I haven't had very many hosts and updates have been fairly
rare recently; but no more
Atom Powers atom.pow...@gmail.com writes:
I would like to make my configuration management system update and/or
install packages on FreeBSD. I've been avoiding that little thorn
because I haven't had very many hosts and updates have been fairly
rare recently; but no more. (cfengine2
All:
The install.cfg mechanism is pretty wicked.
Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be a really efficient way
to provide new clients (or class of clients) an install.cfg
without rebuilding an MFSROOT image.
At least with pxeboot(8), in TFTP-only-mode, using
dhcpd.conf(5) client{}
On 21/04/10 21:59, Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC) wrote:
All:
The install.cfg mechanism is pretty wicked.
Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be a really efficient way
to provide new clients (or class of clients) an install.cfg
without rebuilding an MFSROOT image.
Possibly a
Yep. that was it. thanks.
Gene
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 08:50:56 +0400, Mikle wrote
Try:
zpool import pool name
or zpool import
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 05:45:56PM -0600, Gene wrote:
Hi -
I've been working on installing 8.0 using zfs and raidz1. I was using
instructions found on the wiki.
Hi -
I've been working on installing 8.0 using zfs and raidz1. I was using
instructions found on the wiki. I got to the point where instructions say to
cd to /dist/8.0* and discovered that the livefs cd for 8.0 has no such
directory. However, the usb memstick did. In order to get into, however, I
Try:
zpool import pool name
or zpool import
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 05:45:56PM -0600, Gene wrote:
Hi -
I've been working on installing 8.0 using zfs and raidz1. I was using
instructions found on the wiki. I got to the point where instructions say to
cd to /dist/8.0* and discovered that the
Hello,
I use FreeBSD 7,and install httpd2.2.14; but
use MPM prefork,perl cgi don't well run.when runing
cgi,would appear :
Internal Server Error
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to
complete your request.
apache's err_log :
Out of memory during
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:32 AM, yuanxuqiang yuanxuqi...@ceopen.cn wrote:
Hello,
I use FreeBSD 7,and install httpd2.2.14; but
use MPM prefork,perl cgi don't well run.when runing
cgi,would appear :
Internal Server Error
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:32 AM, yuanxuqiang yuanxuqi...@ceopen.cn wrote:
Hello,
I use FreeBSD 7,and install httpd2.2.14; but
use MPM prefork,perl cgi don't well run.when runing
cgi,would appear :
[..]
Yes, I know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/03/2010 01:48:36, Rob Weissenburger wrote:
I have been picking my brain apart trying to figure this one out. Any
help is appricated.
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --mandir=/usr/local/man
--enable-ssl --enable-suexec --enable-cgi
I have been picking my brain apart trying to figure this one out. Any
help is appricated.
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/apache --mandir=/usr/local/man
--enable-ssl --enable-suexec --enable-cgi --enable-rewrite --enable-so
--enable-modules=most --enable-mods-shared=max
I just freshly installed gpodder from ports (which I updated on
Tuesday), but I get the following errors thrown at me when I try to
start it:
gpodder
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/bin/gpodder, line 162, in module
from gpodder import gui
File
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 13:58:07 -0800, Walt Pawley w...@wump.org wrote:
At 1:28 PM -0500 3/6/10, Chuck Swiger wrote:
While I think floppy drives are still useful for BIOS updates and the
like, it's not just Apple that isn't selling machines with floppy
drives any more. Go to HP or Dell and try
When installing gnome from the ports
# make install clean
installs a few hundred packages and displays dozens and dozens times a
configuration window
which I always answer by hitting TAB key to move to OK button and then
enter.
Now this installation is already busy for 7 hours (when will it end
Portmaster (ports-mgmt/portmaster) will help you do that.
- Sincerely,
Dan Naumov
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
You may also want to try make BATCH=yes install clean
~Brian Callahan
--Original Message--
From: n dhert
Sender: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: make make install accept defaults
Sent: Mar 7, 2010 2:08 PM
When installing gnome from the ports
n == n dhert ndhert...@gmail.com writes:
n When installing gnome from the ports
n # make install clean
n installs a few hundred packages and displays dozens and dozens times a
n configuration window
n which I always answer by hitting TAB key to move to OK button and then
n enter.
n Now
At 1:28 PM -0500 3/6/10, Chuck Swiger wrote:
While I think floppy drives are still useful for BIOS updates and the
like, it's not just Apple that isn't selling machines with floppy
drives any more. Go to HP or Dell and try to buy a new machine with a
floppy drive-- they don't sell them anymore,
Laptop with Freebsd 8.0, with gnome installed and
gdm_enable=YES
gnome_enable=YES
in /etc/rc.conf, no changes to /etc/ttys (that is: ttyv8 ... xdm off)
After reboot, system starts in gnome, gives a greenish background,
a taskbar at the bottom, with only date/time, a button for 'Universal
access
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 12:46 AM, n dhert ndhert...@gmail.com wrote:
Laptop with Freebsd 8.0, with gnome installed and
gdm_enable=YES
gnome_enable=YES
in /etc/rc.conf, no changes to /etc/ttys (that is: ttyv8 ... xdm off)
After reboot, system starts in gnome, gives a greenish background,
a
Piotr Lukawski plukaw...@googlemail.com wrote:
... I really cannot understand why nobody can change
just one parameter and put the file in a proper place in
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/8.0-RELEASE/floppies/
I seem to remember something about the floppy images being dropped
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/03/2010 09:26:22, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
I seem to remember something about the floppy images being dropped
because few current (or even recent) systems have a floppy drive at
all, much less a bootable one.
Yeah, but the floppy disk
In many situations, especially for and old or non standard equipment
floppies are the best or even the only solution.
Actually if I haven't found the solution to use floppy to install FreeBSD, I
would be forced to use another system eg. OpenBSD instead, even if I prefer
FreeBSD.
The decision
booting via CD, USB or network isn't possible,
what are the options?
Okay, with FreeBSD, you can extract the hard disk,
place it into a different computer and then install
the OS there; retransfer the hard disk to the original
computer and everything should work from now on.
(Special hardware may
What system board revision does you're Thinkpad have?
You can use CPU-Z (http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php) to check on this.
The revision 3 and above system boards can run 64bit OS's.
Also if you're CPU is one of the following a a BIOS upgrade/setting
may enable the full set of processor
On Friday 05 of March 2010 17:09:56 Pietro Cerutti wrote:
On 2010-Mar-05, 16:47, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
There has been one more commit on that port:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/x11-toolkits/fltk/files/patch
-src_filename_list.cxx.diff?r1=1.4;r2=1.5;f=h
That one
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 03:19:31PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
What system board revision does you're Thinkpad have?
You can use CPU-Z (http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php) to check on this.
That looks like a handy tool. Is there a version that will run on
FreeBSD?
--
Chad Perrin [ original
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 03:19:31PM +0200, Ross Cameron wrote:
What system board revision does you're Thinkpad have?
You can use CPU-Z (http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php) to check on this.
That looks like a handy tool. Is
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 09:54:38 +
From: Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
Subject: Re: freebsd install from floppy
To: per...@pluto.rain.com
Cc: questi...@freebsd.org,
plukaw...@gmail.com
Message-ID: 4b92265e.5030...@infracaninophile.co.uk
Content-Type: text/plain
On Mar 6, 2010, at 12:44 PM, James Phillips wrote:
Correction: Apple stopped selling computers with floppy drives about
10 years ago. The floppy drive is not obsolete because there is
still no viable replacement that has the same (or better)
functionality.
While I think floppy drives are
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 01:33:52PM +0100, Piotr Lukawski wrote:
Dears,
I need to install Freebsd 8.0 using floppy and then ftp, but there are no
floppy images in
+ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/8.0-RELEASE/floppies/ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/8.0-RELEASE
Hello,
I try to install kde3 after fresh install FreeBSD 8.0 and freebsd-update to
FreeBSD 8.0 p2 on i386 athlon-xp 1660 MHz, but with no success. Here is the
output:
# cd /usr/ports/x11/kde3
# make install clean
=== Installing for kde-3.5.10_3
=== kde-3.5.10_3 depends on executable
Hello,
I try to install kde4 (and kde3 in erlier post) after fresh install FreeBSD
8.0 and freebsd-update to FreeBSD 8.0 p2 on i386 athlon-xp 1660 MHz, but with
no success. Here is the output:
# cd /usr/ports/x11/kde4
# make install clean
=== Installing for kde4-4.3.5
=== kde4-4.3.5 depends
Hello,
I try to install octave (kde3, kde4 in erlier post) after fresh install
FreeBSD 8.0 and freebsd-update to FreeBSD 8.0 p2 on i386 athlon-xp 1660 MHz,
but with no success.
I forgot to add that I csup-ed the ports tree today.
Here is the output:
# make install clean
=== octave-3.2.4
On 01/-10/-28163 20:59, Zbigniew Komarnicki wrote:
I try to install octave (kde3, kde4 in erlier post) after fresh install
FreeBSD 8.0 and freebsd-update to FreeBSD 8.0 p2 on i386 athlon-xp 1660 MHz,
but with no success.
I forgot to add that I csup-ed the ports tree today.
If I try to rebuild
Hi,
is it possible to do a real preview with portupgrade? I want to see all
ports that would be installed/upgraded when installing a particular port.
The --noexecute option doesn't really show me a lot. How would this be done
with packages? pkg_add would have to download all packges first to be
On 03/05/2010 16:24, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
On 01/-10/-28163 20:59, Zbigniew Komarnicki wrote:
I try to install octave (kde3, kde4 in erlier post) after fresh install
FreeBSD 8.0 and freebsd-update to FreeBSD 8.0 p2 on i386 athlon-xp
1660 MHz,
but with no success.
I forgot to add that I
On 03/05/10 16:43, Anselm Strauss wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to do a real preview with portupgrade? I want to see all
ports that would be installed/upgraded when installing a particular port.
The --noexecute option doesn't really show me a lot. How would this be done
with packages? pkg_add would
On 2010-Mar-05, 16:47, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
There has been one more commit on that port:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/x11-toolkits/fltk/files/patch-src_filename_list.cxx.diff?r1=1.4;r2=1.5;f=h
That one looks suspicious because (__FreeBSD_version = 73) make the
That gives me some static information on the ports requirements. But I would
like a preview of what rests to be done. Some ports have a lot of
dependencies, most of them are already installed. Can ports also incorporate
the current state of installed packages?
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 5:01 PM,
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Anselm Strauss wrote:
is it possible to do a real preview with portupgrade? I want to see all
ports that would be installed/upgraded when installing a particular port.
The --noexecute option doesn't really show me a lot.
It shows what portupgrade would do, which is nothing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/03/2010 16:14:12, Anselm Strauss wrote:
That gives me some static information on the ports requirements. But I would
like a preview of what rests to be done. Some ports have a lot of
dependencies, most of them are already installed. Can ports
On 03/05/10 17:14, Anselm Strauss wrote:
That gives me some static information on the ports requirements. But I
would like a preview of what rests to be done. Some ports have a lot of
dependencies, most of them are already installed. Can ports also
incorporate the current state of installed
/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/8.0-RELEASE/floppies/
.
It can simplify life for many people.
Thanks again for your help.
Take care,
Piotr
On 4 March 2010 05:51, ill...@gmail.com ill...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 March 2010 07:33, Piotr Lukawski plukaw...@googlemail.com wrote:
Dears,
I need to install
On 5 March 2010 13:51, Piotr Lukawski plukaw...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 4 March 2010 05:51, ill...@gmail.com ill...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 March 2010 07:33, Piotr Lukawski plukaw...@googlemail.com wrote:
Dears,
I need to install Freebsd 8.0 using floppy and then ftp
The amd64 arch installer for 8.0-RELEASE fails to start on a ThinkPad T60
with an Intel Centrino Core Duo. What am I doing wrong?
error message:
CPU doesn't support long mode
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
pgppIKPpWPaUa.pgp
Description: PGP
to install
the i386 version.
--
Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com
PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
You have a CPU that does not have 64-bit extensions. You need to install
the i386 version.
Oh, crap, you're right. I was thinking 64b, but it's 32b instruction set
dual core. My mistake.
Please disregard my brain-dead question.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http
Dears,
I need to install Freebsd 8.0 using floppy and then ftp, but there are no
floppy images in
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/8.0-RELEASE/floppies/ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/8.0-RELEASE/floppies/mentioned
in
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books
On 3 March 2010 07:33, Piotr Lukawski plukaw...@googlemail.com wrote:
Dears,
I need to install Freebsd 8.0 using floppy and then ftp, but there are no
floppy images in
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/8.0-RELEASE/floppies/ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/8.0
Hello folks
A few weeks ago, there was a discussion started by me regarding
abysmal read/write performance using ZFS mirror on 8.0-RELEASE. I was
using an Atom 330 system with 2GB ram and it was pointed out to me
that my problem was most likely having both disks attached to a PCI
SIL3124
On 02/19/10 14:26, Programmer In Training wrote:
On 02/19/10 13:50, Polytropon wrote:
snip
And don't miss the documentation about getting Flash
stuff running:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/desktop-browsers.html
That all worked except for the last command:
nspluginwrapper -v -a -i
from a local FS?
Greetings Frank
I did forget that but I grabbed it from ports instead. Teeny-tiny
install. Even with all dependencies (I went ahead and installed
nspluginwrapper since linux_base-f10 is a dependency) and it took less
then 15 minutes.
Thanks. (:
--
Yours In Christ,
PIT
On 02/19/10 15:27, Adam Vande More wrote:
snip
Better yet, update your ports tree and install the current version
Everytime I run portsnap update it says it's up to date. So I just
fetched it and am extracting it right now. I'd run freebsd-udpate but
that errors out, too.
--
Yours
On 02/19/10 15:34, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Programmer In Training
p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote:
Everytime I run portsnap update it says it's up to date. So I just
fetched it and am extracting it right now. I'd run freebsd-udpate but
that errors out, too.
Hi, thanks for replying
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 03:10:05AM +0100, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
Somehow your linux.ko is broken, do you perhaps have WITHOUT_LINUX=
in /etc/src.conf or /etc/make.conf?
I have no src.conf
make.conf looks like this:
$ cat /etc/make.conf | less
CPUTYPE?=athlon64
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 08:47:01AM +, John wrote:
Hi, thanks for replying
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 03:10:05AM +0100, Pieter de Goeje wrote:
Somehow your linux.ko is broken, do you perhaps have WITHOUT_LINUX=
in /etc/src.conf or /etc/make.conf?
I have no src.conf
make.conf
pflog.ko
81 0x80a23000 2bd2dpf.ko
91 0x80a4f000 a8ca fuse.ko
101 0x80a5a000 7d6 accf_http.ko
111 0x80a5b000 1ce accf_data.ko
If I try to install the linux port:
# cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10
# make
=== linux_base-f10
ng_bluetooth.ko
71 0x80a22000 a24 pflog.ko
81 0x80a23000 2bd2dpf.ko
91 0x80a4f000 a8ca fuse.ko
101 0x80a5a000 7d6 accf_http.ko
111 0x80a5b000 1ce accf_data.ko
If I try to install the linux port
attempting to use sysinstall to install it on my present system.
Every time I run it, though, I get the following error message during
the download:
http://www.joseph-a-nagy-jr.us/images/error-msgs/sysinstall-error.png
This is run from an xterm session. (uxterm -sb -rv)
Any clues or alternate ways
forgot to install an additional package. We're
not in MICROS~1 land here. :-)
So
I'm attempting to use sysinstall to install it on my present system.
Every time I run it, though, I get the following error message during
the download:
Your message is:
Add of package linux_base-fc6
On 19/02/10 20:42, Programmer In Training wrote:
Any clues or alternate ways of getting this done?
IIRC you first need to load the linux and linprocfs kernel modules and
mount linproc.
BR, Erik
--
Erik Nørgaard
Ph: +34.666334818/+34.915211157 http://www.locolomo.org
the whole OS just because you
accidentally forgot to install an additional package. We're
not in MICROS~1 land here. :-)
I know, but it seems almost easier to do it then instead of later.
So
I'm attempting to use sysinstall to install it on my present system.
Every time I run it, though, I get
Hello!
Programmer In Training schrieb:
On 02/19/10 13:50, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:42:09 -0600, Programmer In Training
p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote:
It's really past the point where I can just wipe the system and
reinstall, making sure to opt for linux emulation from the
and
reinstall, making sure to opt for linux emulation from the get go.
It is not needed to reinstall the whole OS just because you
accidentally forgot to install an additional package. We're
not in MICROS~1 land here. :-)
I know, but it seems almost easier to do it then instead of later
the directory ~/.mozilla/plugins and symlinking the file there
(or running nspluginwrapper -v -a -i) doesn't help, either.
Of course I did forget to install
www/linux-f10-flashplugin10
BUT, it doesn't matter that I forgot it.
[r...@heaven]make install clean
=== Vulnerability check disabled, database
Of course I did forget to install
www/linux-f10-flashplugin10
BUT, it doesn't matter that I forgot it.
[r...@heaven]make install clean
=== Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
= install_flash_player_10_linux.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in
/usr/ports/distfiles/flashplugin
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Programmer In Training
p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote:
Everytime I run portsnap update it says it's up to date. So I just
fetched it and am extracting it right now. I'd run freebsd-udpate but
that errors out, too.
You have to run portsnap fetch update
the portsnap system before, the first thing you have to
do is:
portsnap fetch extract
Then every time you need to update the portsnap you have to use the command:
portsnap fetch update
I fyou want to install the linux compatibility system you must first load the
linux kernel module using (as root
that the mfsboot install worked.
My experience so far is that mfsbsd works well but I
would like to be able to do the whole operation without mailing
out labeled CDR's or USB sticks. Each of our remote sites has 2
FreeBSD boxes and I can just see a hurried individual
accidentally switching the media so
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Danny Edge nocmon...@gmail.com wrote:
I was advised to try this again. New install FreeBSD 7.2 R, installing
Postfix from cd /usr/ports/mail/postfix make install clean
I receive
I was advised to try this again. New install FreeBSD 7.2 R, installing
Postfix from cd /usr/ports/mail/postfix make install clean
I receive the following error near the end of the install:
checking whether -fkeep-inline-functions is supported... yes
updating cache ./config.cache
creating
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Danny Edge nocmon...@gmail.com wrote:
I was advised to try this again. New install FreeBSD 7.2 R, installing
Postfix from cd /usr/ports/mail/postfix make install clean
I receive the following error near the end of the install:
checking whether -fkeep-inline
Dan Naumov wrote:
[j...@atombsd ~]$ dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/jago/test2 bs=1M count=4096
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
4294967296 bytes transferred in 143.878615 secs (29851325 bytes/sec)
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds /
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
I've checked with the manufacturer and it seems that the Sil3124 in
this NAS is indeed a PCI card. More info on the card in question is
available at http://green-pcs.co.uk/2009/01/28/tranquil-bbs2-those-pci-cards/
I have the card described later on the
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
I've checked with the manufacturer and it seems that the Sil3124 in
this NAS is indeed a PCI card. More info on the card in question is
available at
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
I've checked with the manufacturer and it seems that the Sil3124 in
this NAS is indeed a PCI
It depends on the bandwidth of the bus that it is on and the controller
itself.
I like to use pci-x with aoc-sat2-mv8 cards or pci-e cardsthat way you
get a lot more bandwidth..
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:32 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Dan
I like to use pci-x with aoc-sat2-mv8 cards or pci-e cardsthat way you
get a lot more bandwidth..
I would goalong with that - I have precisely the same controller, with
a pair of eSATA drives, running ZFS mirrored. But I get a nice 100
meg/second out of them if I try. My controller is,
aoc-sat2-mv8 was somewhat slower compared to ICH9 or LSI1068
controllers when I tried it with 6 and 8 disks.
I think the problem is that MV8 only does 32K per transfer and that
does seem to matter when you have 8 drives hooked up to it. I don't
have hard numbers, but peak throughput of MV8 with
Artem Belevich wrote:
aoc-sat2-mv8 was somewhat slower compared to ICH9 or LSI1068
controllers when I tried it with 6 and 8 disks.
I think the problem is that MV8 only does 32K per transfer and that
does seem to matter when you have 8 drives hooked up to it. I don't
have hard numbers, but
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Artem Belevich wrote:
aoc-sat2-mv8 was somewhat slower compared to ICH9 or LSI1068
controllers when I tried it with 6 and 8 disks.
I think the problem is that MV8 only does 32K per transfer and that
does seem to matter
Dan Naumov wrote:
Alexander, since you seem to be experienced in the area, what do you
think of these 2 for use in a FreeBSD8 ZFS NAS:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=HIPMI=Y
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
Alexander, since you seem to be experienced in the area, what do you
think of these 2 for use in a FreeBSD8 ZFS NAS:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H
Dan Naumov wrote:
CPU-performance-wise, I am not really worried. The current system is
an Atom 330 and even that is a bit overkill for what I do with it and
from what I am seeing, the new Atom D510 used on those boards is a
tiny bit faster. What I want and care about for this system are
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
CPU-performance-wise, I am not really worried. The current system is
an Atom 330 and even that is a bit overkill for what I do with it and
from what I am seeing, the new Atom D510 used on those boards is a
tiny bit faster. What I want and care about
Alexander Motin wrote:
Chris Whitehouse wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
CPU-performance-wise, I am not really worried. The current system is
an Atom 330 and even that is a bit overkill for what I do with it and
from what I am seeing, the new Atom D510 used on those boards is a
tiny bit faster. What I
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
CPU-performance-wise, I am not really worried. The current system is
an Atom 330 and even that is a bit overkill for what I do with it and
from what I am seeing, the new Atom D510 used on those boards is a
tiny bit faster. What I want and care about for
Note: Since my issue is slow performance right off the bat and not
performance degradation over time, I decided to start a separate
discussion. After installing a fresh pure ZFS 8.0 system and building
all my ports, I decided to do some benchmarking. At this point, about
a dozen of ports has been
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jason Edwards sub.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dan,
I read on FreeBSD mailinglist you had some performance issues with ZFS.
Perhaps i can help you with that.
You seem to be running a single mirror, which means you won't have any speed
benefit regarding writes,
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Jason Edwards sub.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dan,
I read on FreeBSD mailinglist you had some performance issues with ZFS.
Perhaps i can help you with that.
You seem to be running a single
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010, Dan Naumov wrote:
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent with the
bonnie results. It also sadly
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Jason Edwards sub.m...@gmail.com wrote:
ZFS writes to a mirror pair
requires two independent writes. If these writes go down independent I/O
paths, then there is hardly any overhead from the 2nd write. If the
writes
go through a bandwidth-limited shared path
Dan Naumov wrote:
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent with the
bonnie results. It also sadly seems to confirm the very slow speed :(
The disks are attached to a 4-port Sil3124 controller and again, my
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent with the
bonnie results. It also sadly seems to confirm the very slow speed
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
This works out to 1GB in 36,2 seconds / 28,2mb/s in the first test and
4GB in 143.8 seconds / 28,4mb/s and somewhat consistent
701 - 800 of 5507 matches
Mail list logo
