On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I just recently update one 6.2 and one 4.11 machine to the latest
stable
sources and built world. Now, for some odd reason, I cannot tunnel X
via ssh from remote clients. Did the
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I just recently update one 6.2 and one 4.11 machine to the latest stable
sources and built world. Now, for some odd reason, I cannot tunnel X
via ssh from remote clients. Did the
I just recently update one 6.2 and one 4.11 machine to the latest stable
sources and built world. Now, for some odd reason, I cannot tunnel X
via ssh from remote clients. Did the defaults for sshd change lately
or is there some other culprit?
I have verified that the client machine in question
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I just recently update one 6.2 and one 4.11 machine to the latest stable
sources and built world. Now, for some odd reason, I cannot tunnel X
via ssh from remote clients. Did the defaults for sshd change lately
or is there some other culprit?
First make
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I just recently update one 6.2 and one 4.11 machine to the latest stable
sources and built world. Now, for some odd reason, I cannot tunnel X
via ssh from remote clients. Did the defaults for sshd change lately
or is there some
In response to Tim Daneliuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I just recently update one 6.2 and one 4.11 machine to the latest stable
sources and built world. Now, for some odd reason, I cannot tunnel X
via ssh from remote clients. Did
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Tim Daneliuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I just recently update one 6.2 and one 4.11 machine to the latest stable
sources and built world. Now, for some odd reason, I cannot tunnel X
via ssh from remote
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
What does ssh'ing with verbose mode show?
I was just doing this as your email arrived. This looks suspicious (!):
Remote: No xauth program; cannot forward with spoofing
This is on an old 4.11 system updated to latest stable. xauth does indeed
--On Tuesday, June 19, 2007 15:15:25 -0500 Tim Daneliuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Tim Daneliuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I just recently update one 6.2 and one 4.11 machine to the latest stable
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
What does ssh'ing with verbose mode show?
I was just doing this as your email arrived. This looks suspicious (!):
Remote: No xauth program; cannot forward with spoofing
This is on an old 4.11 system updated to latest stable.
John Webster wrote:
--On Tuesday, June 19, 2007 15:15:25 -0500 Tim Daneliuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Tim Daneliuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Bill Campbell wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
I just recently update one 6.2 and one 4.11 machine to
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
What does ssh'ing with verbose mode show?
I was just doing this as your email arrived. This looks suspicious (!):
Remote: No xauth program; cannot forward with spoofing
This is on an old 4.11 system updated to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
What does ssh'ing with verbose mode show?
I was just doing this as your email arrived. This looks suspicious (!):
Remote: No xauth program; cannot forward with spoofing
This is on an
13 matches
Mail list logo
