Re: (SAMBA) issue with filehandles being released under 6.1-RELEASE?

2006-11-13 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just wondering if anyone else was experiencing the same issues that I am.. it's related to Samba-3.0.22c and sockets / filehandles. For some odd reason every couple days (~2 days) I have to restart the smbd daemon because it eats up 6000+ filehandles,

Re: (SAMBA) issue with filehandles being released under 6.1-RELEASE?

2006-11-13 Thread Bill Moran
In response to Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just wondering if anyone else was experiencing the same issues that I am.. it's related to Samba-3.0.22c and sockets / filehandles. For some odd reason every couple days (~2 days) I have to

Re: (SAMBA) issue with filehandles being released under 6.1-RELEASE?

2006-11-13 Thread Garrett Cooper
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lowell Gilbert wrote: Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just wondering if anyone else was experiencing the same issues that I am.. it's related to Samba-3.0.22c and sockets / filehandles. For some odd reason every couple days (~2 days) I

Re: (SAMBA) issue with filehandles being released under 6.1-RELEASE?

2006-11-13 Thread Garrett Cooper
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bill Moran wrote: In response to Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just wondering if anyone else was experiencing the same issues that I am.. it's related to Samba-3.0.22c and sockets / filehandles.

Issue with filehandles being released under 6.1-RELEASE?

2006-11-10 Thread Garrett Cooper
Just wondering if anyone else was experiencing the same issues that I am.. it's related to Samba-3.0.22c and sockets / filehandles. For some odd reason every couple days (~2 days) I have to restart the smbd daemon because it eats up 6000+ filehandles, just for sockets I assume (based on