On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:20:06 +0100
Erik Cederstrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'll have to answer that yourself. How valuable is your data? What are
you trying to protect? If you're worrying about getting cracked and used
as a spam bot, jails are no more secure than a non-jail system.
On Nov 16, 2007 6:57 AM, Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:20:06 +0100
Erik Cederstrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'll have to answer that yourself. How valuable is your data? What are
you trying to protect? If you're worrying about getting cracked and used
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Federico Lorenzi spaketh thusly:
-} you trying to protect? If you're worrying about getting cracked and used
-} as a spam bot, jails are no more secure than a non-jail system.
-}
-} Maybe some qualification is needed here.
-}
-} If your mail jail gets broken into, then it
I've heard that things like freebsd jails or solaris zones can still
be insecure on multicore boxes because a race condition can occur. I
don't know more details about it other than that. Is this true now on
freebsd?
Also, I have a home server which I'm considering running apache, bind,
dhcp,
Matt Fioravante wrote:
I've heard that things like freebsd jails or solaris zones can still
be insecure on multicore boxes because a race condition can occur. I
don't know more details about it other than that. Is this true now on
freebsd?
There's always the possibility that a bug exists which
