___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
--As of April 8, 2011 3:50:52 PM -0600, Chad Perrin is alleged to have said:
You seem to fail to realize that it's possible to CC someone who isn't on
the list, but not CC someone who *is* on the list. That would be why
people who aren't members of the list say thinks like "please CC me",
while
Hi,
On Saturday 09 April 2011 05:46:43 Carmel wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 15:50:52 -0600
> Chad Perrin articulated:
>
> The solution to this problem is so obvious that I am amazed that no one
this is a solution which creates just new problems.
> has proposed it. Simply require the poster to be
Can we just drop this matter? It's bad enough that iPhone mail makes this whole
ordeal a pain in the butt to read, but in the grand scheme of things, it _just
doesn't matter_. I'm subscribed to the list, I expect lots of email from the
list that I probably won't read anyway, but at least it's he
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 15:50:52 -0600
Chad Perrin articulated:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 11:15:11PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:11:52PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
> > > >
> > > > section 8.6 starts:
>
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 23:15:11 +0200
Erik Trulsson wrote:
> You seem to miss one crucial fact: Not all the people who write to
> this list are subscribed to it. They will not see any replies
> directed only to the list. It is for their benefit that that rule
> exists.
I don't know about anyone e
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 11:15:11PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:11:52PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
> > >
> > > section 8.6 starts:
> > >
> > > start quote
> > > Unless there is a good reason to
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:11:52PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
> >
> > section 8.6 starts:
> >
> > start quote
> > Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and
> > to FreeBSD-questions.
> > end
On 8 April 2011 16:10, Carmel wrote:
> By the way, did you notice I directed a polite, one sentence directive
> towards Odhiambo. Suddenly, every buttinsky crawls out of the woodwork,
> sans any factual input on my original post and hijacks this thread
Maybe you would be better served by not usin
On 8 April 2011 20:28, Chad Perrin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 08:30:25PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
>> On 8 Apr 2011 20:25, "Chad Perrin" wrote:
>> >
>> > I, for one, am glad this does not happen more often. I really do
>> > *not* need a bunch of duplicates cluttering up my inbox. I have ye
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 13:11:52 -0600
Chad Perrin articulated:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
> >
> > section 8.6 starts:
> >
> > start quote
> > Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender
> > and to FreeBSD-questions.
> > end
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 12:34:24PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
>
> +1 (I replied, cluttering up inboxes all over freebsdland)
You didn't CC me directly, though, for which I'm grateful.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
pgpnTlZSkroSX.pgp
Description: PGP s
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 08:30:25PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 8 Apr 2011 20:25, "Chad Perrin" wrote:
> >
> > I, for one, am glad this does not happen more often. I really do
> > *not* need a bunch of duplicates cluttering up my inbox. I have yet
> > to see anyone complain of not receiving a C
Quoth Chad Perrin on Friday, 08 April 2011:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
> >
> > section 8.6 starts:
> >
> > start quote
> > Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and
> > to FreeBSD-questions.
> > end quote
>
>
On 8 Apr 2011 20:25, "Chad Perrin" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
> >
> > section 8.6 starts:
> >
> > start quote
> > Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and
> > to FreeBSD-questions.
> > end quote
>
> I,
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
>
> section 8.6 starts:
>
> start quote
> Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and
> to FreeBSD-questions.
> end quote
I, for one, am glad this does not happen more often. I really d
On Apr 8, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Yes, although a new E2100L is much than $20 more than the refurb'ed 160NL.
Hmm, substitute: "isn't much than $20 more"...
-C
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mai
Hi--
On Apr 8, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Bryan H. wrote:
> Ah, I was unaware that it had been discontinued, perhaps that's the
> reason for the (relatively) low cost. ;-)
Yes, although a new E2100L is much than $20 more than the refurb'ed 160NL.
> As for dd-wrt, I personally find the extra features (l
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Bryan H. wrote:
>> If you're just looking for a new router, I would highly recommend the
>> Linksys WRT160NL. I got mine refurbished from Cisco's store[1], and
>> flashed it with dd-wrt[2] (which was incredibly easy
On 04/08/11 16:21, Carmel wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 12:51:41 +0100
Arthur Chance articulated:
On 04/07/11 15:32, Carmel wrote:
Odhiambo, please don't CC me. I don't need multiple copies of the
same post.
CCing the original poster is standard etiquette on FreeBSD mailing
lists. Most lists a
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Jon Radel wrote:
>
> That's the nice thing about standards, there are so many of them to choose
> from.
>
>
>
>> 2) I placed a very clear notice at the bottom of my post(s). Many
>> people would consider that a clue as to my desire to receive multiple
>> copies of
Ok
Ce message a été envoyé depuis un terminal BlackBerry de Bouygues Telecom
-Original Message-
From: Carmel
Sender: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 06:55:57
To: FreeBSD
Reply-To: FreeBSD
Subject: Re: Linksys-E4200 Wireless N-router
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 07:56
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 18:05, Carmel wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:03:57 +0300
> Odhiambo Washington articulated:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 13:55, Carmel wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 07:56:00 +0300
> > > Odhiambo Washington articulated:
> > >
> > > > It may void the warranty yes, bu
On 4/8/11 11:21 AM, Carmel wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 12:51:41 +0100
Arthur Chance articulated:
On 04/07/11 15:32, Carmel wrote:
Odhiambo, please don't CC me. I don't need multiple copies of the
same post.
CCing the original poster is standard etiquette on FreeBSD mailing
lists. Most lists
Friday 08 of April 2011 17:05:51 Carmel napisał(a):
> On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:03:57 +0300
>
> Odhiambo Washington articulated:
> > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 13:55, Carmel wrote:
> > > On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 07:56:00 +0300
> > >
> > > Odhiambo Washington articulated:
> > > > It may void the warranty yes
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 12:51:41 +0100
Arthur Chance articulated:
> On 04/07/11 15:32, Carmel wrote:
> > Odhiambo, please don't CC me. I don't need multiple copies of the
> > same post.
>
> CCing the original poster is standard etiquette on FreeBSD mailing
> lists. Most lists are open to anybody to
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:03:57 +0300
Odhiambo Washington articulated:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 13:55, Carmel wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 07:56:00 +0300
> > Odhiambo Washington articulated:
> >
> > > It may void the warranty yes, but dd-wrt has more features than
> > > stock firmware.
> >
> >
On 04/07/11 15:32, Carmel wrote:
Odhiambo, please don't CC me. I don't need multiple copies of the same
post.
CCing the original poster is standard etiquette on FreeBSD mailing
lists. Most lists are open to anybody to mail to without being signed
up, so when replying there's no way of knowing
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 13:55, Carmel wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 07:56:00 +0300
> Odhiambo Washington articulated:
>
> > It may void the warranty yes, but dd-wrt has more features than stock
> > firmware.
>
> That is like saying "A" is better than "B" without divulging any
> specific information
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 07:56:00 +0300
Odhiambo Washington articulated:
> It may void the warranty yes, but dd-wrt has more features than stock
> firmware.
That is like saying "A" is better than "B" without divulging any
specific information. It is just a hollow statement. Either point me to
the spec
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Carmel wrote:
> What do you gain by flashing it? I did not see anything specific
> mentioned. This would also undoubtedly void any guarantee on the unit
> I presume.
>
Technically yes. However, I have had a failed dd-wrt replaced under
warranty. Other people I k
; On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 17:00:43 +0300
> > >> Odhiambo Washington articulated:
> > >>
> > >> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 15:54, Carmel
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > I was wondering if anyone here has had any experi
>>
> >> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 15:54, Carmel
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I was wondering if anyone here has had any experience with a
> >> > > "Linksys-E4200 Wireless N-
On Apr 7, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Bryan H. wrote:
> If you're just looking for a new router, I would highly recommend the
> Linksys WRT160NL. I got mine refurbished from Cisco's store[1], and
> flashed it with dd-wrt[2] (which was incredibly easy, just search for
> the router in dd-wrt's "router databas
; > > I was wondering if anyone here has had any experience with a
>> > > "Linksys-E4200 Wireless N-router"
>> > > <
>> > >
>> http://homestore.cisco.com/en-us/Routers/Linksys-E4200-MaximumPerformance-Wirelessn-router_stcVVpro
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 17:32, Carmel wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 17:00:43 +0300
> Odhiambo Washington articulated:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 15:54, Carmel wrote:
> >
> > > I was wondering if anyone here has had any experience with a
> >
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 17:00:43 +0300
Odhiambo Washington articulated:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 15:54, Carmel wrote:
>
> > I was wondering if anyone here has had any experience with a
> > "Linksys-E4200 Wireless N-router"
> > <
> > http://home
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Carmel wrote:
I was wondering if anyone here has had any experience with a
"Linksys-E4200 Wireless N-router"
I know that FreeBSD probably does not support its wireless functions as
it employs 802.11n wireless technology; however, other than that
does anyone have
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 15:54, Carmel wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone here has had any experience with a
> "Linksys-E4200 Wireless N-router"
> <
> http://homestore.cisco.com/en-us/Routers/Linksys-E4200-MaximumPerformance-Wirelessn-router_stcVVproductId122703236VVcatId
I was wondering if anyone here has had any experience with a
"Linksys-E4200 Wireless N-router"
<http://homestore.cisco.com/en-us/Routers/Linksys-E4200-MaximumPerformance-Wirelessn-router_stcVVproductId122703236VVcatId551966VVviewprod.htm?icid=meet-series-e4200-image-btn&src2=m
40 matches
Mail list logo
