On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 05:08, Andrew Humphries wrote:
On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 13:51, C. Ulrich wrote:
On Sat, 2003-10-25 at 00:43, andi payn wrote:
4. While running a similar set of services, FreeBSD may be using less
background processing time. Or maybe not. I definitely see significantly
On Sat, 2003-10-25 at 00:43, andi payn wrote:
4. While running a similar set of services, FreeBSD may be using less
background processing time. Or maybe not. I definitely see significantly
lower CPU usage (idling under X, FreeBSD shows about 2-10% CPU, linux
about 15-35%). However, this may
On Mon, 2003-10-27 at 13:51, C. Ulrich wrote:
On Sat, 2003-10-25 at 00:43, andi payn wrote:
4. While running a similar set of services, FreeBSD may be using less
background processing time. Or maybe not. I definitely see significantly
lower CPU usage (idling under X, FreeBSD shows about
dear FreeBSD team:
I am a new user to both Linux and FreeBSD. I installed
both system (4.8 and slackware 9) under VMware for
windows they are working ok.
Before parting my HD and do a real installation ,
without VMware emulator. I am interested to know which
of one runs faster. What about Linux
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 14:44, Alessio Caffi wrote:
dear FreeBSD team:
I am a new user to both Linux and FreeBSD. I installed
both system (4.8 and slackware 9) under VMware for
windows they are working ok.
Before parting my HD and do a real installation ,
without VMware emulator. I am
