Re: Makefile OPTIONS (was: Re: Apache 2.2.8 + mod_authnz_ldap)

2008-05-09 Thread n j
> If this is a fixed dependency, then it's a bug in the port's Makefile. If it's > not set in stone (i.e.: mod_authnz_ldap could also work with > mod_fictional_3rdparty_ldap), then applying the logic you suggest, would kill > the option to use mod_fictional_3rdparty_ldap. > > Set in stone would

Re: Makefile OPTIONS (was: Re: Apache 2.2.8 + mod_authnz_ldap)

2008-05-09 Thread Mel
On Friday 09 May 2008 15:15:05 n j wrote: > > What are you using for apr? The one that comes with apache itself, or the > > devel/apr port? > > AFAICT, the one that comes with Apache itself. > > It would seem that mod_authnz_ldap required mod_ldap to be compiled in > Apache to work. Having little

Makefile OPTIONS (was: Re: Apache 2.2.8 + mod_authnz_ldap)

2008-05-09 Thread n j
> What are you using for apr? The one that comes with apache itself, or the > devel/apr port? AFAICT, the one that comes with Apache itself. It would seem that mod_authnz_ldap required mod_ldap to be compiled in Apache to work. Having little or no experience at all with Apache + LDAP combination