an /etc/rc.local and I don't want to. The obvious
argument against modifying /etc/rc is that it will add another merging
operation to mergemaster whenever I upgrade. Is this kind of modification
suitable for putting in /etc/rc.conf?
Don't change /etc/rc. If you break it, your machine won't
? Is this a Bad Idea (tm)? I'm sure
there's a reason /usr/X11R6/bin isn't in the path set in that script. So
far I haven't made an /etc/rc.local and I don't want to. The obvious
argument against modifying /etc/rc is that it will add another merging
operation to mergemaster whenever I upgrade
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Chris Doherty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
unless I'm wrong, /etc/rc.local exists specifically so you don't have to
modify /etc/rc. /etc/rc refers to rc.local as traditional (but rather
obsolete), but nowhere in my FreeBSD travels over the past four years
have I found any
On 2003-01-30 08:40, Chris Doherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
unless I'm wrong, /etc/rc.local exists specifically so you don't
have to modify /etc/rc. /etc/rc refers to rc.local as traditional
(but rather obsolete), but nowhere in my FreeBSD travels over the
past four years have I found any
Chris Doherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
unless I'm wrong, /etc/rc.local exists specifically so you don't have to
modify /etc/rc. /etc/rc refers to rc.local as traditional (but rather
obsolete), but nowhere in my FreeBSD travels over the past four years
have I found any suggestion of what else
modifying /etc/rc is that it will add another merging
operation to mergemaster whenever I upgrade. Is this kind of modification
suitable for putting in /etc/rc.conf?
--
Roger
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
