TECTED]> wrote:
Got a bit of an interesting question, wondering how others out there might
have dealt with this:
we have a single machine acting as router/firewall/nat gateway via DSL. It
routes a small (/29) subnet of static IP's to our servers, and routes
between internal (non-public) sub
Got a bit of an interesting question, wondering how others out there might
have dealt with this:
we have a single machine acting as router/firewall/nat gateway via DSL. It
routes a small (/29) subnet of static IP's to our servers, and routes
between internal (non-public) subnets. Int
On 5/14/06, Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On second thought, it looks like you don't. There is an ipdivert
kernel module that should get you the divert sockets.
Hmm. I don't see it on my 5.4 system.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] kernel]# ls ip*
ip6fw.ko* ip_mroute.ko* ipfw.ko*
Lowell Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Looking here
>>
>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-natd.html
>>
>> I tried to run natd, but I got an error that the socket type was not
>> supported. Do I really need
"Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> People,
>
> I have just set up my 5.4 box as a gateway to my DSL connection. I
> used this section of the freebsd handbook.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/pppoe.html
>
> I enabled NAT on the PPP connection, and viola
People,
I have just set up my 5.4 box as a gateway to my DSL connection. I
used this section of the freebsd handbook.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/pppoe.html
I enabled NAT on the PPP connection, and viola, it works.
I still have to set up my firewall, but I'm curio
Matt Coe, CCNA wrote:
Hey, I'm having some issues convincing my old Pentium 90 to behave as
a basic NAT box and gateway.. I've been a CCNA for nearly three years
now and I still haven't had a chance to properly play with other
people's networks, so I'm trying to make my own... but to no avail.
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Matt Coe, CCNA wrote:
> [snip] ... but nothing goes from dc0 to rl0, for some reason beyond
> me. Here's a snippet of my rc.conf if it helps:
>
> ifconfig_rl0="DHCP"
> ifconfig_dc0="inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0"
> gateway_enable=YES
> natd_enable=YES
> natd_interface
Hey, I'm having some issues convincing my old Pentium 90 to behave as a
basic NAT box and gateway.. I've been a CCNA for nearly three years now
and I still haven't had a chance to properly play with other people's
networks, so I'm trying to make my own... but to no avail. I downloaded
the 5.x m
Hi all,
I currently have an issue of how "open" the whole WiFi tends to be, so,
as all good people should do, I've started implementing a IPSec
encryption system rather than the rather disappointing WEP.
I'm encrypting all data to and from the gateway, which isn't a problem.
This was documented r
On Tuesday, Dec 10, 2002, at 12:25 US/Eastern, Dru wrote:
The configuration you describe is still considered tunnel mode, even
though it looks part transport / part tunnel mode. Tunnel mode occurs
whenever a gateway encrypts on behalf of a network. Typical tunnels
have
gateways at both ends, ho
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Jeff Walters wrote:
> At home I have a FreeBSD gateway working nicely for NAT and firewall.
> One of the machines behind this firewall is an OS X iBook running
> through a WEP-enabled Airport base station in bridged mode (i.e. it
> only bridges the wireless and the ethernet)
Theres good info on
http://www.samag.com/documents/s=7121/sam0205a/sam0205a.htm, including some
ipsec linkage at the bottom.
Brian
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Walters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 8:21 AM
S
At home I have a FreeBSD gateway working nicely for NAT and firewall.
One of the machines behind this firewall is an OS X iBook running
through a WEP-enabled Airport base station in bridged mode (i.e. it
only bridges the wireless and the ethernet). WEP has known problems,
and I'd like to secu
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Robert Hall wrote:
> I'm setting up a FreeBSD 4.4 box again after a system crash. It's
> intended to be a gateway. I can communicate with the other hosts on my
> network, but I can't communicate outside the network. netstat -r shows
> that I have the default route; ppp is conn
I'm setting up a FreeBSD 4.4 box again after a system crash. It's intended
to be a gateway. I can communicate with the other hosts on my network, but
I can't communicate outside the network. netstat -r shows that I have the
default route; ppp is connecting to my ISP and getting the dynamically
16 matches
Mail list logo
