Re: OT: Funny disclaimers (Was: Re: ssh root@localhost)

2005-02-04 Thread Colin J. Raven
On Feb 2 at 22:49, Erik Norgaard said with a chuckle: Sorry to join in on the noise: Occasionally noise on this otherwise studious list is fun. This is one time. *This* subscriber likes the change of pace :) Both statements are backwards and can't impose any responsibility on my behalf nor

Re: OT: Funny disclaimers (Was: Re: ssh root@localhost)

2005-02-04 Thread Svein Halvor Halvorsen
* Bart Silverstrim [2005-02-03 08:01 -0500] I wonder why if the messages are so important they don't PGP or GPG them. Wouldn't that make more sense for sensitive material? To send email from the UllevÄl university hospital in Oslo, the first to words of the email needs to be ikke sensitiv

Re: OT: Funny disclaimers (Was: Re: ssh root@localhost)

2005-02-03 Thread Bart Silverstrim
On Feb 2, 2005, at 4:49 PM, Erik Norgaard wrote: Sorry to join in on the noise: =quote= This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy

OT: Funny disclaimers (Was: Re: ssh root@localhost)

2005-02-02 Thread Nico Meijer
Hey, Sorry for the noise, but... -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions

Re: OT: Funny disclaimers (Was: Re: ssh root@localhost)

2005-02-02 Thread Chuck Swiger
Nico Meijer wrote: -- By reading this mail you agree to the following: using or giving out the email address and any other info of the author of this email is strictly forbidden. By acting against this agreement the author of this mail will take possible legal actions against the abuse. Could

Re: OT: Funny disclaimers (Was: Re: ssh root@localhost)

2005-02-02 Thread Nico Meijer
Hey Chuck, You cannot be forced into a legally binding contract simply by reading a statement, no. Thank $DEITY that's still true. That doesn't mean the author won't try to sue people anyway, but even a spammer is unlikely to have anything to worry about unless the author is remarkably

Re: OT: Funny disclaimers (Was: Re: ssh root@localhost)

2005-02-02 Thread Erik Norgaard
Sorry to join in on the noise: =quote= This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the

Re: OT: Funny disclaimers (Was: Re: ssh root@localhost)

2005-02-02 Thread Peter N. M. Hansteen
Erik Norgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What makes me wonder is that these messages are always at the end, when you have read the secret message. If anything it will only make me alert that this could be secret, and if I am evil, ofcourse I would not delete the mail. eureka It just struck