On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:34:06PM -0800, James Phillips typed:
--- On Mon, 11/30/09, Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk wrote:
This is actually the way UFS/FFS works too: when my system
was crashing
fairly regularly I was a bit surprised to find empty files
after
editing them.
O. Hartmann wrote:
I'm just wondering what's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 when I read the
Benchmarks on Phoronix.org's website. Especially FreeBSD's threaded I/O
shows in contrast to all claims that have been to be improoved the
opposite.
Instead of trying to compare something, I propose to
I'm just wondering what's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 when I read the
Benchmarks on Phoronix.org's website. Especially FreeBSD's threaded I/O
shows in contrast to all claims that have been to be improoved the opposite.
oh
___
I didn't know these were released already, but I had a look. I was
disappointed with the results.
If anyone wants to look here is the link:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=freebsd8_benchmarksnum=1
Linux's ext4 seems to leave UFS and ZFS well behind in a number of
On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:47 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
I'm just wondering what's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 when I read the
Benchmarks on Phoronix.org's website. Especially FreeBSD's threaded I/O shows
in contrast to all claims that have been to be improoved the opposite.
Corrected link:
Thomas Backman wrote:
On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:47 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
I'm just wondering what's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 when I read the
Benchmarks on Phoronix.org's website. Especially FreeBSD's threaded I/O shows
in contrast to all claims that have been to be improoved the opposite.
On Nov 30, 2009, at 12:38 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
Thomas Backman wrote:
On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:47 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
I'm just wondering what's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 when I read the
Benchmarks on Phoronix.org's website. Especially FreeBSD's threaded I/O
shows in contrast to all
Thomas Backman wrote:
On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:47 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
I'm just wondering what's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 when I read the
Benchmarks on Phoronix.org's website. Especially FreeBSD's threaded I/O shows
in contrast to all claims that have been to be improoved the opposite.
In response to Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org:
Thomas Backman wrote:
On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:47 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
I'm just wondering what's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 when I read the
Benchmarks on Phoronix.org's website. Especially FreeBSD's threaded I/O
shows in contrast to all
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 02:49:17PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org:
Thomas Backman wrote:
On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:47 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
I'm just wondering what's wrong with FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 when I read the
Benchmarks on
Holger Kipp wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 02:49:17PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
On the other hand, random IO is negatively influenced by readahead :)
Parallel Random I/O gives better results on Raid 5 than a single sequential
read :-) I also found FreeBSD UFS with Softupdates handling
Bill Moran writes:
It's common knowledge that the default value for vfs.read_max is
non- optimal for most hardware and that significant performance
improvements can be made in most cases by raising it.
Documentation/discussion where?
Respectfully,
In response to Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com:
Bill Moran writes:
It's common knowledge that the default value for vfs.read_max is
non- optimal for most hardware and that significant performance
improvements can be made in most cases by raising it.
Documentation/discussion
Robert Huff wrote:
Bill Moran writes:
It's common knowledge that the default value for vfs.read_max is
non- optimal for most hardware and that significant performance
improvements can be made in most cases by raising it.
Documentation/discussion where?
There is no documentation
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:07:15 +1100
From: alex a...@mailinglist.ahhyes.net
Subject: Re: Phoronix Benchmarks: Waht's wrong with FreeBSD
8.0?
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: 4b138b43.4000...@mailinglist.ahhyes.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15;
format=flowed
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:22:17 -0800 (PST)
James Phillips anti_spam...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:07:15 +1100
From: alex a...@mailinglist.ahhyes.net
Subject: Re: Phoronix Benchmarks: Waht's wrong with FreeBSD
8.0?
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID
--- On Mon, 11/30/09, Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk wrote:
This is actually the way UFS/FFS works too: when my system
was crashing
fairly regularly I was a bit surprised to find empty files
after
editing them.
Also, I just verified that saving a file, rebooting,
editing it again
17 matches
Mail list logo
