activities without problem, but
doesn't appear to be able to connect to the router at all. In fact, if I do:
tcpdmp -l -i eth1 host 192.168.1.1
and then do telnet 192.168.1.1 443, there are two wierd results:
1. the tcpdump catches nothing
2. the telnet window got the following result:
Trying
I have upgraded my development system to 9.1 without any problems. This system
maintains kernel source and I build a new kernel with a couple extra options
there. The other systems mount /usr/src and /usr/obj from it and do the
install. The first one to be upgraded had no problem with make
On 12/30/2012 7:11 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
It indicates
that the / partition cannot be mounted to continue booting.
Maybe you can interrupt at the boot loader and examine the
mount source for /, or manually set it to be ada0p1?
I'll try that.
OK - I'm at the part of loader2(?)
Situation:
One of my boxes failed, and for various reasons it became easier to
just scrub and rebuild it.
1) Using BSDinstall, I created the first disk:
ada0p1 freebsd-boot128k
ada0p2 freebsd-swap4g
ada0p3 freebsd-ufs 25g
2) Installed off the CD, got it
On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 17:26:40 -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
Used csup (tag=.) to update the source tree as of midnight last night.
This seems to be discouraged today. Instead svn should be used.
5) On rebooting, the loader(??) claims to not be able to find a
bootable partition - i.e.
On 12/30/2012 6:24 PM, Polytropon wrote:
Used csup (tag=.) to update the source tree as of midnight last night.
This seems to be discouraged today. Instead svn should be used.
I'm using this for ports, will convert for source ... probably in the
next round after I deal with this.
On 20.11.2012 20:47, Laszlo Nagy wrote:
I have a 8.2-STABLE system. Last port upgrade was about a year ago. (I
know, this is bad.) I was trying to update all ports, by following the
UPDATING file. As it turned out, some ports has been
deprecated/deleted. I have a problem in particular
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 447, Issue 1, Message: 13
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 18:48:12 +0100 Dh?nin Jean-Jacques dhe...@gmail.com
2012/12/23 Polytropon free...@edvax.de
#!/bin/sh
cat foo.txt | while read LINE1
do
cat bar.txt | while read LINE2
do
-
break9- fi10- done11- echo Value of sw is : $sw12- if [
$sw = 0 ]; then13- DO SOMETHING14- fi15- sw=016- done
You probebly guessed what I want to do. But the problem is that when the value
of sw sets to 1 (in the first if statement) and the loop breaks
string, causing read to throw an error.
You probebly guessed what I want to do. But the problem is that
when the value of sw sets to 1 (in the first if statement) and
the loop breaks , the value of sw is not '1' anymore in
echo Value of sw is : $sw !!!
Thanks in advance
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:34:34 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
First, the lines with read have to be:
cat /foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE1
cat /foo/bar/foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE2
Reason: $LINE1 and $LINE2 will be evaluated here, they are empty
string, causing read to throw an error.
On 23/12/2012 09:43, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:34:34 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
First, the lines with read have to be:
cat /foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE1
cat /foo/bar/foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE2
Reason: $LINE1 and $LINE2 will be evaluated here, they are empty
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:57:02 +
Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hmmm I'd just like to draw your attention to the comm(1) program,
which lets you find lines common to two files, or only in one or other
of a pair of inputs, very easily. The only slight gotcha is that the
input
2012/12/23 Polytropon free...@edvax.de
On Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:34:34 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
First, the lines with read have to be:
cat /foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE1
cat /foo/bar/foo/bar.txt | while read $LINE2
Reason: $LINE1 and $LINE2 will be evaluated here, they are
2012/12/23 Polytropon free...@edvax.de
#!/bin/sh
cat foo.txt | while read LINE1
do
cat bar.txt | while read LINE2
do
if [ $LINE1 = $LINE2 ]; then
sw=1
echo Current value of sw is : $sw
Hi all,
I here reproduce the mail I sent to freebsd-x11 for which I received
no reply. I hope I have more luck in questions@
I'm having quite a few problems setting DRI up on my system. I'm
running 9.0-RELEASE on amd64 using GENERIC kernel. I recompiled the
radeon kernel module with
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, free...@johnea.net wrote:
One of the complications was getting old metadata off of the drive. After
trying a couple of 'dd' invocations:
# overwriting the first sector
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ada0 bs=512 count=1
# also tried overwriting the last sector
diskinfo ada0 | cut
I previously used binary update to migrate from 9.0 to 9.1, via:
freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.1-RC1
freebsd-update install
reboot
freebsd-update install
reboot
I'm starting to think having the swap partition in gm0s1a and the booting
UFS partition in ada0s1b is the problem:
http
On 11/21/12 05:11, Warren Block wrote:
gptboot looks for the first UFS partition. Maybe /boot/boot can be
modified to do that also.
It's a little more complicated than that Warren.
AIUI gptboot first looks (in partition order) for partitions with both
the bootme and bootonce attributes set.
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012, Arthur Chance wrote:
On 11/21/12 05:11, Warren Block wrote:
gptboot looks for the first UFS partition. Maybe /boot/boot can be
modified to do that also.
It's a little more complicated than that Warren.
AIUI gptboot first looks (in partition order) for partitions with
I have a 8.2-STABLE system. Last port upgrade was about a year ago. (I
know, this is bad.) I was trying to update all ports, by following the
UPDATING file. As it turned out, some ports has been deprecated/deleted.
I have a problem in particular with the py-bittornado-core port. I do
not need
Hello,
I recently installed a 9.1-RC2 system using gmirror with MBR, and swap in first
bsdlabel.
orsbackup# gpart show
=63 3907029104 mirror/gm0 MBR (1.8T)
63 63 - free - (31k)
126 3907028979 1 freebsd [active] (1.8T)
On 11/20/12 13:34, free...@johnea.net wrote:
Hello,
I recently installed a 9.1-RC2 system using gmirror with MBR, and swap in
first bsdlabel.
orsbackup# gpart show
=63 3907029104 mirror/gm0 MBR (1.8T)
63 63 - free - (31k)
126
-r 9.1-RC1
freebsd-update install
reboot
freebsd-update install
reboot
I'm starting to think having the swap partition in gm0s1a and the booting UFS
partition in ada0s1b is the problem:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=31954
The Not UFS error comes immediately on boot.
If I boot from
to migrate from 9.0 to 9.1, via:
freebsd-update upgrade -r 9.1-RC1
freebsd-update install
reboot
freebsd-update install
reboot
I'm starting to think having the swap partition in gm0s1a and the booting UFS
partition in ada0s1b is the problem:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=31954
The Not UFS
On 11/16/12 21:38, Warren Block wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 11/16/12 12:10, Warren Block wrote:
Additional SSD suggestions: when creating partitions, leave out the swap
partition. If you have lots of memory, leave out the /tmp partition. Add
that extra space to the
the problem listed above.
Can anyone please point out what might be the error and any possible
solution ? I personally think the port is either broken, or the Makefile
does not use the correct link options.
Thank you
--
Regards,
Manish Jain
bourne.ident...@hotmail.com
(4.0G) /var
513803864194304 5 freebsd-ufs (2.0G) /tmp
55574690 192216088 6 freebsd-ufs (91G) /usr
2477907782278869- free - (1.1G)
It would not cause this problem, but those partitions are not aligned.
That would only affect speed
freebsd-ufs (4.0G) /var
513803864194304 5 freebsd-ufs (2.0G) /tmp
55574690 192216088 6 freebsd-ufs (91G) /usr
2477907782278869- free - (1.1G)
It would not cause this problem, but those partitions are not aligned.
That would only affect speed
4194304 5 freebsd-ufs (2.0G) /tmp
55574690 192216088 6 freebsd-ufs (91G) /usr
2477907782278869- free - (1.1G)
It would not cause this problem, but those partitions are not aligned.
That would only affect speed, not reliability.
geezes, it's not even
freebsd-ufs (4.0G) /var
513803864194304 5 freebsd-ufs (2.0G) /tmp
55574690 192216088 6 freebsd-ufs (91G) /usr
2477907782278869- free - (1.1G)
It would not cause this problem, but those partitions are not aligned.
That would only affect speed
freebsd-ufs (4.0G) /var
513803864194304 5 freebsd-ufs (2.0G) /tmp
55574690 192216088 6 freebsd-ufs (91G) /usr
2477907782278869- free - (1.1G)
It would not cause this problem, but those partitions are not aligned.
That would only affect speed
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 11/16/12 12:10, Warren Block wrote:
Additional SSD suggestions: when creating partitions, leave out the swap
partition. If you have lots of memory, leave out the /tmp partition. Add
that extra space to the /usr partition.
Format the UFS filesystems
that means.
This machine has:
16G mem
0.5G swap
2G /tmp
4G /var
Is any of that likely to be related to the problem?
Given an addr in the failure error:
g_vfs_done() ada0p6 [WRITE(offset=38838571008 length=4096)]error=6
how does one relate that addr to the partitioning scheme
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Gary Aitken free...@dreamchaser.orgwrote:
Error 6 is ENXIO, device not configured; not sure exactly what that means.
This machine has:
16G mem
0.5G swap
2G /tmp
4G /var
Is any of that likely to be related to the problem?
Given an addr
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:30:43 -0600
Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds like you have bad hardware. Drive, cable, controller etc.
Probably wouldn't hurt to do a fsck either.
*After* identifying and fixing the hardware problem, otherwise you
may make things worse
- free - (1.1G)
It would not cause this problem, but those partitions are not aligned.
That would only affect speed, not reliability.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
,
but rather entered none
I did not get all of the desired contents.
Can anyone shed light on this problem?
I have been able to restore most everything from a cp I had done
at the same time, but I'm not very confident in the results.
Fortunately, user data was on a different disk.
Obviously
El día Wednesday, November 14, 2012 a las 01:20:14AM -0700, Gary Aitken
escribió:
I needed to expand a /var partition,
which required saving and restoring /var and /usr
did the following:
booted to backup disk
dump -0aR -h 0 -f /usr/backup/dump_var_0_20121113_1920 /dev/ada0p4
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 01:20:14 -0700, Gary Aitken wrote:
mount /dev/ada0p4 /mnt/ssd/var
cd /mnt/ssd/var
restore -r /usr/backup/dump_var_0_20121113_1920
Cannot find file dump list
The last command looks wrong. The restore program requires
the dump file to be provided via -f, so
From: Polytropon free...@edvax.de
To: free...@dreamchaser.org
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: ugh. dump / restore problem(s) Cannot find file dump list
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 01
El día Wednesday, November 14, 2012 a las 01:01:08AM -0800, Jack Mc Lauren
escribió:
Hi
There is no - . This is the correct format : restore rf /path/to/dump/files
from man restore(8):
RESTORE(8) FreeBSD System Manager's Manual
RESTORE(8)
NAME
restore, rrestore — restore
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 01:01:08 -0800 (PST), Jack Mc Lauren wrote:
There is no - . This is the correct format : restore rf /path/to/dump/files
Really? The manual at man restore mentions:
restore -r [-dDNuvy] [-b blocksize] [-f file | -P pipecommand]
[-s fileno]
And in the -r
to restore
into the current dir; check the man page for details;
Sorry all, a typing issue on my part when composing the email; problem remains:
# restore -iN -f /mnt/hd_ssd_backup/usr/backup/dump_tmp_0_20121113_1920
Cannot find file dump list
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 01:01:08 -0800 (PST), Jack Mc Lauren wrote:
There is no - . This is the correct format : restore rf /path/to/dump/files
Really? The manual at man restore mentions:
restore -r [-dDNuvy] [-b blocksize] [-f file | -P pipecommand]
El día Wednesday, November 14, 2012 a las 09:45:22AM -0700, Warren Block
escribió:
One of the (in my opinion) most interesting reference sources
for dump/restore also mentions this format:
# mount /dev/da0s1 /mnt
# mkdir /tmp/oldvar
# cd /tmp/oldvar
# restore -ruf
I am attempting to migrate a test box to pkgng, and have run into
difficulty:
When I run the pkg2ng script, it fails to register postgreql-jdbc because
one if its files, namely /usr/local/share/doc/postgresql/README-client,
is also installed by postgresql-client-9.2.1.
In this, pkgng is
I have a server that I use to host ISO images, and mount them so they
are available via network shares. I ran into a problem today, I
temporarily made an ISO image accessible via a md device and mounted it
under /mnt just to check the data on the ISO image. My ISO mount script
ran its
Hi,
I have never had a problem with dual-booting Win XP and FreeBSD before.
Generally, I install XP first and FreeBSD second, putting the Boot
Manager to the MBR. Recently, my hard disk started wobbling and I had to
replace it with a new Western Digital SATA drive.
When all installation
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 22:09:09 +0530
From: Manish Jain bourne.ident...@hotmail.com
Subject: Facing a strange problem with Boot Manager
When all installation work finished, FreeBSD would boot when I press F2
but pressing F1 would fail to boot XP with the error :
A disk read error
On 12-Nov-12 02:35, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 22:09:09 +0530
From: Manish Jain bourne.ident...@hotmail.com
Subject: Facing a strange problem with Boot Manager
When all installation work finished, FreeBSD would boot when I press F2
but pressing F1 would fail to boot XP
Hi,
I hit a problem today during a system update.
There were two libxul ports:
/usr/ports/www/libxul
/usr/ports/www/libxul19
of which the last one was installed:
/var/db/pkg/libxul-1.9.2.28_1/
There was a port to update which died on error:
# portmaster icedtea-web
...
=== The dependency for www
But theese are different packages (different names). since ports dont have
any equivalent of debian provides flag it is impossible to figure it out
in a safe way.
09-11-2012 19:19, jb jb.1234a...@gmail.com napisał(a):
Hi,
I hit a problem today during a system update.
There were two libxul
uki ukaszg at gmail.com writes:
But theese are different packages (different names). since ports dont have
any equivalent of debian provides flag it is impossible to figure it out
in a safe way.
I have never built a port/package, so I could be wrong here.
This paragraph seems to contain
Hi all
I have some problems in the second phase of running a
device from a nanobsd image.
After copying the image on a flash memory, and after I set
the system to boot up from flash memory, I just see a black screen and a
blinking cursor ! looks like the boot device ( flash memory ) is not
don't mind
pulling in and building a few more ports as long as it is not the whole
GNOME2 metaport
Rebuilding everything is the least complicated way of fixing the problem. It's
a big job but if you don't do that then you're likely to have to keep doing
even more firefighting in the future
. :-(
Hi All,
After reading all the replies to my earlier post Problem with libpng +
Mozilla applications on FreeBSD 8.3, I finally summoned up the courage
to build the GNOME2 metaport from the ports directory. Since this would
not be possible within my lifetime with my usual internet connection, I
On 10/28/12 20:50, Manish Jain wrote:
# dmesg | grep -i ath
Empty output
Doesn't look like your atheros network card has been detected by your
system.
Did you check the ath(4) man page to see if your particular piece of
hardware is supported on FreeBSD 8.3?
don't mind
pulling in and building a few more ports as long as it is not the whole
GNOME2 metaport.
It could very well be the whole Gnome 2 metaport. :-(
Hi All,
After reading all the replies to my earlier post Problem with libpng +
Mozilla applications on FreeBSD 8.3, I finally summoned up
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, Manish Jain wrote:
Those in a position to help but smugly choose not to may soon start
experiencing a dramatic decline in their good fortunes.
I'm not in a position to help, but I can explain a couple of things.
# kldload ath
kldload: can't load ath: File exists
#
about the utter mess that is filesystem/device/geom/blahblah
labels that to recommend this is borderline insane.
The proper way to solve this problem is to user /boot/loader.conf
tie-downs to assign each disk to each individual controllers' device
number (e.g. ada0 -- scbus0 -- ahcich0
On 26.10.2012 18:00, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:18:16 +0200, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
The Problem is that, if there is a Drive in one of the HotSwap Bays the
PCI-Express controller is detected as ahci0 and the onboard is detected
as ahci1. Therefore any drives in the HotSwap Bays
this doesn't work because the numbering of the ahci change with
the occupancy of the Hot-Swap Bays.
And that is my Problem. This i have tried first.
Any idea how i can fix which controller gets which number.
just you labels. Chose the labelling method which fits best your file
system. gpt
Sometimes placing symlink to the newer version of library instead of
older version helps.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 00:06:44 +0530, Manish Jain wrote:
Hello Polytropon,
Thanks for replying.
Maybe an update of FF and TB would
Hi,
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 10:25:41 +0200
Gerhard Schmidt schm...@ze.tum.de wrote:
On 26.10.2012 18:00, Polytropon wrote:
= I'm not sure if this can be done, but using labels should
make the question go away, and the problem causing it. :-)
Labels are good for naming Drives but how does
On Saturday 27 October 2012 09:42:10 Alexandr Alexeev wrote:
Sometimes placing symlink to the newer version of library instead of
older version helps.
Specifying the alternative version in /etc/libmap.conf (5) is a neater way of
doing this.
The man page also shows you how to restrict the
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 00:06:44 +0530, Manish Jain wrote:
Hello Polytropon,
Thanks for replying.
Maybe an update of FF and TB would be sufficient, so it can link
to the present (or at least expected) libraries
not use labels to solve this.
Sorry this doesn't work because the numbering of the ahci change with
the occupancy of the Hot-Swap Bays.
And that is my Problem. This i have tried first.
Any idea how i can fix which controller gets which number.
just you labels. Chose the labelling method
On 2012.10.26 14:18, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
if there is a Drive in one of the HotSwap Bays the
PCI-Express controller is detected as ahci0 and the onboard is detected
as ahci1.
So Far i could have set some devices.hints entries to sort the scsi
busses. But the problem
Gerhard Schmidt schm...@ze.tum.de writes:
Labels are good for naming Drives but how does it help me if the root
filesystem changing device ids. I don't think the boot loader is able to
use the label for the root Filesystem.
From my fstab:
/dev/ufs/Oak / ufs rw,noatime
But Mozilla applications like Firefox and Thunderbird present
a peculiar problem - the buttons on the Tool bar/Menu bar do not
have any image on them.
The problem is not Mozilla-specific. I built Opera web browser from
ports, and that too has images missing from its buttons.
Looks like I am
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 01:43:11 +0530, Manish Jain wrote:
But Mozilla applications like Firefox and Thunderbird present
a peculiar problem - the buttons on the Tool bar/Menu bar do not
have any image on them.
The problem is not Mozilla-specific. I built Opera web browser from
ports
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 22:19:16 +0200
From: Polytropon free...@edvax.de
Subject: Re: Problem with libpng + Mozilla applications on FreeBSD 8.3
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 01:43:11 +0530, Manish Jain wrote:
Looks like I am going to have to contend with being less image-inative
in the coming days
On 28-Oct-12 01:49, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 01:43:11 +0530, Manish Jain wrote:
But Mozilla applications like Firefox and Thunderbird present
a peculiar problem - the buttons on the Tool bar/Menu bar do not
have any image on them.
The problem is not Mozilla-specific. I built
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 05:47:46 +0530, Manish Jain wrote:
On 28-Oct-12 01:49, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012 01:43:11 +0530, Manish Jain wrote:
But Mozilla applications like Firefox and Thunderbird present
a peculiar problem - the buttons on the Tool bar/Menu bar do not
have any
Hi,
i have a very strange Problem with my new Workstation.
The Problem is the order of the sata controllers.
The Mainboard has 6 sata Ports and i have a PCI-Express Card with 4 more
sata Channels.
I boot from a SSD connected to port 0 in the Mainboard.
Channels 1-3 are additional Harddisks
and Thunderbird present a peculiar problem - the buttons on
the Tool bar/Menu bar do not have any image on them. While this is not
exactly a catastrophe, it is rankling to say the least. Maybe some
gentleman has faced this problem and has sorted it out. If anyone can
provide a hint on how to fix
a port management tool (like portmaster) to deal
with installing and updating of ports.
This time
things went a lot more smoothly. GNOME works. But Mozilla applications
like Firefox and Thunderbird present a peculiar problem - the buttons on
the Tool bar/Menu bar do not have any image
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:18:16 +0200, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
The Problem is that, if there is a Drive in one of the HotSwap Bays the
PCI-Express controller is detected as ahci0 and the onboard is detected
as ahci1. Therefore any drives in the HotSwap Bays become ada0-3 and the
drives
/blahblah
labels that to recommend this is borderline insane.
The proper way to solve this problem is to user /boot/loader.conf
tie-downs to assign each disk to each individual controllers' device
number (e.g. ada0 -- scbus0 -- ahcich0, or whatever you want). Please
note I said ahcichX, not ahciX
and more) where concluding
which disk? is sometimes required, in terms of disk, not
disk _bay_.
The proper way to solve this problem is to user /boot/loader.conf
tie-downs to assign each disk to each individual controllers' device
number (e.g. ada0 -- scbus0 -- ahcich0, or whatever you want
Freenas 0.7.2 is old.
Is write cache enable?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/configtuning-disk.html
Is ZFS in use?
ZFS has a value for tuning.
On 22.10.2012 07:34, Henti Smith wrote:
Hi all.
I'm having a very weird problem with a friends Freenas set-up. I'm
trying
to
a 1MByte boundary -- matters greatly for SSDs due to NAND erase page
size!), you're subjected to the problem where GEOM stores its metadata
in the last sector, which is also where GPT stores its backup table.
This is even documented in the Handbook, which is both good *and*
hilarious
might be facing the same problem.
Regards,
Manish Jain
bourne.ident...@hotmail.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 00:06:44 +0530, Manish Jain wrote:
Hello Polytropon,
Thanks for replying.
Maybe an update of FF and TB would be sufficient, so it can link
to the present (or at least expected) libraries accordingly.
Maybe I did not make it clear enough in the original message.
: use GPT
labels when possible, otherwise use filesystem labels or glabel.
The proper way to solve this problem is to user /boot/loader.conf
tie-downs to assign each disk to each individual controllers' device
number (e.g. ada0 -- scbus0 -- ahcich0, or whatever you want). Please
note I said
Hi,
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:33:38 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org wrote:
Regarding this:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2012-October/245862.html
No no NO *NO*!
YES, YES, YES, YES!
The proper way to solve this problem is to user /boot/loader.conf
How does
it by
adding --without-gvfs to the options in the Makefile but the problem
reappeared after a recent upgrade to my ports. The port upgrade didn't touch
gimp-app so I assume the problem is caused by some dependency which has been
upgraded.
I've tried rebuilding gimp-app both with and without my
running under FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE, all ports are up to date and there are no
missing dependencies.
I had similar problems in the past and managed to fix it by
adding --without-gvfs to the options in the Makefile but the problem
reappeared after a recent upgrade to my ports. The port upgrade
Hello,
Advice? I have not seen this before:
(685) @ 2:22:16 cd /usr/src
(686) @ 2:22:18 svn up
Updating '.':
Skipped 'sys' -- Node remains in conflict
At revision 241794.
Summary of conflicts:
Skipped paths: 1
(687) @ 2:22:43
- more background information:
On 21/10/2012 07:35, Darrel wrote:
Advice? I have not seen this before:
(685) @ 2:22:16 cd /usr/src
(686) @ 2:22:18 svn up
Updating '.':
Skipped 'sys' -- Node remains in conflict
At revision 241794.
Summary of conflicts:
Skipped paths: 1
(687) @ 2:22:43
For some reason svn thinks
Hi all.
I'm having a very weird problem with a friends Freenas set-up. I'm
trying to backup his data before migrating to nas4free or just plain
FreeBSD.
The setup is as follows:
HP Microserver N36.
2BG Mem (1713 MB Usable) (no swap)
4 x 2000GB (ST2000DL003-9VT166 Seagate) drives in a graid5
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:14:10PM -0700, Timothy Snowberger wrote:
On 10/17/2012 7:27 AM, Jim Trigg wrote:
Any suggestions on how to fix this?
---
argent(1) /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster# freebsd-update -r 9.0-RELEASE
upgrade
Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y
...
Fetching
Any suggestions on how to fix this?
---
argent(1) /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster# freebsd-update -r 9.0-RELEASE
upgrade
Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found.
Fetching metadata signature for 8.2-RELEASE from update5.FreeBSD.org... done.
Fetching metadata index... done.
On 10/17/2012 7:27 AM, Jim Trigg wrote:
Any suggestions on how to fix this?
---
argent(1) /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster# freebsd-update -r 9.0-RELEASE
upgrade
Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found.
Fetching metadata signature for 8.2-RELEASE from update5.FreeBSD.org...
xorg.conf automatically or manually can not fix my problem.
installing nvidia driver from ports also can not fix my problem.
some ideas --
The release notes for nvidia-driver 304.51 lists the 310M as supported.
Check that you have the latest version
Maybe try with driver nv instead of nvidia to see
is about 800x600 and I can not
change it. Color depth is also terrible.
Configuring xorg.conf automatically or manually can not fix my problem.
installing nvidia driver from ports also can not fix my problem.
Notebook has NVIDIA Optimus technology and I don't know may be it's source
of my problem
OK, maybe different way: where is the source code for this loader
available? Somehow I'm unable to find it.
--
Z.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Fri, 5 Oct 2012 09:30:56 +, Zbigniew wrote:
OK, maybe different way: where is the source code for this loader
available? Somehow I'm unable to find it.
You're searching for this? /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/loader
And the Forth related stuff: /usr/src/sys/boot/forth
--
Polytropon
2012/10/5, Polytropon free...@edvax.de:
You're searching for this? /usr/src/sys/boot/i386/loader
And the Forth related stuff: /usr/src/sys/boot/forth
Made a quick search in the Internet - maybe too quick indeed. And
not really necessary, it seems.
Thanks.
--
Z.
201 - 300 of 10446 matches
Mail list logo
