Am 10.08.2006 um 01:09 schrieb Christopher Martin:
Also, the load IPSec (or any encryption method for that matter)
places on
the encapsulating router is non-trivial, so be aware that if your
hardware
is a bit old you may get disappointing performance. I would suggest
making
the hardware at
L PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christopher
> Martin
> Sent: Thursday, 10 August 2006 8:42 AM
> To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: FreeBSD as a VPN Server/Router
>
>
>
> >
> > The FreeBSD Handbook has a chapter on this:
> >
> > http
>
> The FreeBSD Handbook has a chapter on this:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ipsec.html
>
> HTH.
>
The only problem with IPSec is you need static IP addresses for the
tunnelling mode (unless somebody knows something I don't, at which point I'd
really like t
Am 09.08.2006 um 19:33 schrieb Odhiambo Washington:
In this scenario, siteA has several applications running on several
windows servers which are behind the FreeBSD box. The challenge is
to allow siteB to access these applications securely via the WAN
setup. VPN comes straight to mind, but
On 08/09/2006 12:33, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
I am going to venture into the field of the security gurus so help me
God! It looks like I am gonna get stuck in wet cement, I can feel it;)
I have two sites, siteA and siteB. Each site has a horde of Windows PCs
behind a FreeBSD box, which acts
there is a freebsd based project called pfsense (.org) that would suit your
needs perfectly.
ive been running it for quite a while now, and i think its the best thing
since sliced bread. i have a IPSec WAN between 2 sites (my apt, and my
servers that are at a colo). tons of features that are
I am going to venture into the field of the security gurus so help me
God! It looks like I am gonna get stuck in wet cement, I can feel it;)
I have two sites, siteA and siteB. Each site has a horde of Windows PCs
behind a FreeBSD box, which acts as a firewall/router/proxy/everything:)
Each site h
