Hi Dimitris,
snip lots of relevaent info
The 10.X.X.X subnet will never need to use any of the
services of the 193.X.X.X subnet or the 193.R.R.R
router. It will always access internet via its own
10.R.R.R router, which only routes packets towards the
internet and never towards the
Hi Vince, Hi list,
--- Vince Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The 10.X.X.X subnet will never need to use any of
the
services of the 193.X.X.X subnet or the 193.R.R.R
router. It will always access internet via its own
10.R.R.R router, which only routes packets towards
the
internet
- Original Message -
From: Dimitris Xochellis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 6:43 PM
Subject: Routing problems
Dear list members,
I have two subnets (10.X.X.X and 193.X.X.X) on the
same physical network (ethernet). Subnet 10.X.X.X has
its
Hi List, hi Vince,
--- Vince Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Dimitris Xochellis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 6:43 PM
Subject: Routing problems
Dear list members,
I have two subnets (10.X.X.X and
On Saturday 06 September 2003 12:19, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to substitute our school's old Win NT4 Server by a
SAMBA/FreeBSD. The SAMBA PDC itself works like a charm, but
without the NT machine it can't be located from the different
subnets - and so is quite useless.
