Re: Using bind9, instead of the default bind8

2004-02-03 Thread Shantanoo
+++ stan [freebsd] [30-01-04 14:31 -0500]: | On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 04:52:12PM -, Edmund Craske wrote: | > There's something wrong with the rc.conf stuff for named if you install the bind9 port over the base bind8 (by doing a make | > -DPORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9 install clean in dns/bind9) bec

Re: Using bind9, instead of the default bind8

2004-01-30 Thread Melvyn Sopacua
On Friday 30 January 2004 20:31, stan wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 04:52:12PM -, Edmund Craske wrote: > > There's something wrong with the rc.conf stuff for named if you install > > the bind9 port over the base bind8 (by doing a make > > -DPORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9 install clean in dns/bind9

Re: Using bind9, instead of the default bind8

2004-01-30 Thread stan
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 04:52:12PM -, Edmund Craske wrote: > There's something wrong with the rc.conf stuff for named if you install the bind9 > port over the base bind8 (by doing a make > -DPORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9 install clean in dns/bind9) because of differences in > command line argument

RE: Using bind9, instead of the default bind8

2004-01-30 Thread Edmund Craske
There's something wrong with the rc.conf stuff for named if you install the bind9 port over the base bind8 (by doing a make -DPORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9 install clean in dns/bind9) because of differences in command line arguments. Of course, you could just work it out and hash it together, or leave