On Sunday 13 March 2005 20:05, Fafa Diliha Romanova wrote:
If I just do:
cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile portmanager -u
Do I need portupgrade at all then?
I think you do, as I understand the situation, portmanager lacks two
significant features.
1. All ports have an implicit dependence on
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 05:03 pm, you wrote:
On Sunday 13 March 2005 20:05, Fafa Diliha Romanova wrote:
If I just do:
cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile portmanager -u
Do I need portupgrade at all then?
I think you do, as I understand the situation, portmanager lacks two
significant
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 17:02:59 -0800, Michael C. Shultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks All, its running OK on my system but there are 55 more ports
still to upgrade! I hope yours is a little faster.
I've got a P4m 2.2GHz so it isn't that slow. My problem is that I have
too much stuff on my
I think there is no big difference between just running portupgrade vs
portmanager. I would say portmanager is better and faster because you
don't need to baby sit, it is really automagical, and there is no
messing with an index.
I keep hearing great things about portmanager, but I have
not been
I keep hearing great things about portmanager, but I have
not been able to run it... when I try, I get:
# portmanager -s
-
--- PMGRrStatus 0.2.9_3 info: Creating inital data bases
On Monday 14 March 2005 03:16 pm, Lee Harr wrote:
I keep hearing great things about portmanager, but I have
not been able to run it... when I try, I get:
# portmanager -s
-
--- PMGRrStatus 0.2.9_3 info:
On Sunday 13 March 2005 12:05 pm, Fafa Diliha Romanova wrote:
If I just do:
cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile portmanager -u
Do I need portupgrade at all then?
Thanks.
Not for upgrading. portsclean (a part of portsupgrade package) is a
nice feature of portupgrade, so is pkg_which and a few
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Sunday 13 March 2005 12:05 pm, Fafa Diliha Romanova wrote:
If I just do:
cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile portmanager -u
Do I need portupgrade at all then?
Thanks.
Not for upgrading. portsclean (a part of portsupgrade package) is a
nice feature of portupgrade, so is
Chris Hodgins wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Sunday 13 March 2005 12:05 pm, Fafa Diliha Romanova wrote:
If I just do:
cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile portmanager -u
Do I need portupgrade at all then?
Thanks.
Not for upgrading. portsclean (a part of portsupgrade package) is a
On Sunday 13 March 2005 12:38 pm, you wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Sunday 13 March 2005 12:05 pm, Fafa Diliha Romanova wrote:
If I just do:
cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile portmanager -u
Do I need portupgrade at all then?
Thanks.
Not for upgrading. portsclean (a part of
Chris wrote:
Chris Hodgins wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Sunday 13 March 2005 12:05 pm, Fafa Diliha Romanova wrote:
If I just do:
cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile portmanager -u
Do I need portupgrade at all then?
Thanks.
Not for upgrading. portsclean (a part of portsupgrade package) is a
Chris Hodgins wrote:
Chris wrote:
Chris Hodgins wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Sunday 13 March 2005 12:05 pm, Fafa Diliha Romanova wrote:
If I just do:
cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile portmanager -u
Do I need portupgrade at all then?
Thanks.
Not for upgrading. portsclean
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Sunday 13 March 2005 12:38 pm, you wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Sunday 13 March 2005 12:05 pm, Fafa Diliha Romanova wrote:
If I just do:
cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile portmanager -u
Do I need portupgrade at all then?
Thanks.
Not for upgrading. portsclean (a part
On Sunday 13 March 2005 12:40 pm, Chris wrote:
Chris Hodgins wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Sunday 13 March 2005 12:05 pm, Fafa Diliha Romanova wrote:
If I just do:
cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile portmanager -u
Do I need portupgrade at all then?
Thanks.
Not for upgrading.
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Sunday 13 March 2005 12:40 pm, Chris wrote:
Chris Hodgins wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Sunday 13 March 2005 12:05 pm, Fafa Diliha Romanova wrote:
If I just do:
cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile portmanager -u
Do I need portupgrade at all then?
Thanks.
Not for
On Mar 13, 2005, at 3:46 PM, Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Sunday 13 March 2005 12:38 pm, you wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Sunday 13 March 2005 12:05 pm, Fafa Diliha Romanova wrote:
If I just do:
cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile portmanager -u
Do I need portupgrade at all then?
Thanks.
Not for
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Portmanager has made most of my updating a no-brainer, and I've been
thankful that Michael was fast to fix problems when I reported what
little I ran into. And this is on an in-use production serverI
trust it with the updates, so either it's a program that works
On Sunday 13 March 2005 04:06 pm, Alistair Sutton wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:52:25 +, Chris Hodgins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent. Does it leave packages for everything or is just
thunderbird that does this?
It will create packages for every port that it updates and place
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:52:25 +, Chris Hodgins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent. Does it leave packages for everything or is just thunderbird
that does this?
It will create packages for every port that it updates and place them
under the usual /usr/ports/packages structure.
Al
--
LJ:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:12:21 -0800, Michael C. Shultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 13 March 2005 04:06 pm, Alistair Sutton wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:52:25 +, Chris Hodgins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent. Does it leave packages for everything or is just
thunderbird
On Sunday 13 March 2005 04:11 pm, Alistair Sutton wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 13:13:35 -0800, Michael C. Shultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One other thing just to let you know, I've been testing portmanager
against this new gnome update, when its done there is a bunch of
gstreamer-plugins-*
On 03/13/05 15:57:23, Chris Hodgins wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Sunday 13 March 2005 12:38 pm, you wrote:
Michael C. Shultz wrote:
On Sunday 13 March 2005 12:05 pm, Fafa Diliha Romanova wrote:
If I just do:
cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile portmanager -u
Do I need portupgrade at all then?
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 13:13:35 -0800, Michael C. Shultz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One other thing just to let you know, I've been testing portmanager
against this new gnome update, when its done there is a bunch of
gstreamer-plugins-* left un-upgraded.
I'm about 3% through the upgrade for that
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 13:28:14 -1000, Robert Marella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like Chris I have packages scattered in my ports directories. I have
just started using Portmanager. I have now created /usr/ports/packages
directory. Do I need to move the packages one at a time from the
individual
24 matches
Mail list logo
