On 02/08/10 22:37, Rick Macklem wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, O. Hartmann wrote:
So I guess the above one is the more 'transparent' one with respect
to the future, when NFSv4 gets mature and its way as matured into the
kernel?
Yea, I'd only use mount -t newnfs if for some reason you want
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, O. Hartmann wrote:
Well, I guess I havn't uderstood everything of NFSv4. The 'concept' of the
'root' is new to me, maybe there are some deeper explanation of the purpose?
Are there supposed to be more than one 'root' enries or only one?
Only to specify different
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, O. Hartmann wrote:
Mounting the filessystem via
mount_newnfs host:/path /path
Oh, and you should set:
sysctl vfs.newnfs.locallocks_enable=0
in the server, since I haven't fixed the local locking yet. (This implies
that apps/daemons running locally on the server
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, O. Hartmann wrote:
Mounting the filessystem via
mount_newnfs host:/path /path
works fine, but not
mount -t nfs4 host:/path /path.
The mount command can be either:
mount -t nfs -o nfsv4 host:/path /path
or
mount -t newnfs -o nfsv4 host:/path /path
(The above was what
On 02/08/10 15:08, Rick Macklem wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, O. Hartmann wrote:
Mounting the filessystem via
mount_newnfs host:/path /path
Oh, and you should set:
sysctl vfs.newnfs.locallocks_enable=0
in the server, since I haven't fixed the local locking yet. (This implies
that
On 02/08/10 15:01, Rick Macklem wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, O. Hartmann wrote:
Mounting the filessystem via
mount_newnfs host:/path /path
works fine, but not
mount -t nfs4 host:/path /path.
The mount command can be either:
mount -t nfs -o nfsv4 host:/path /path
or
mount -t newnfs -o
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, O. Hartmann wrote:
Oh, and you should set:
sysctl vfs.newnfs.locallocks_enable=0
in the server, since I haven't fixed the local locking yet. (This implies
that apps/daemons running locally on the server won't see byte range
locks performed by NFSv4 clients.) However,
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, O. Hartmann wrote:
So I guess the above one is the more 'transparent' one with respect to the
future, when NFSv4 gets mature and its way as matured into the kernel?
Yea, I'd only use mount -t newnfs if for some reason you want to
test/use the experimental client for
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca wrote:
ps: ZFS also has its own export stuff, but it is my understanding that
putting a line in /etc/exports is sufficient. I've never used ZFS,
so others will know more than I.
My understanding (from having used NFS and
