On May 26, 2011, at 3:01 PM, David Banning wrote:
I have an old FreeBSD 4.9 installation that I cannot upgrade.
You've also got a FreeBSD installation which the ports tree does not support.
I wanted to install something from the ports, but I am getting
this error on almost every port;
#
On Thu, 26 May 2011 15:40:09 -0700
Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
On May 26, 2011, at 3:01 PM, David Banning wrote:
I have an old FreeBSD 4.9 installation that I cannot upgrade.
You've also got a FreeBSD installation which the ports tree does not
support.
I wanted to install
Desmond Chapman wrote:
/usr/X11R6 exists, but it is not a symlink. Installation cannot proceed.
This looks like an incompletely removed old version of X. In the current
version, /usr/X11R6 must be a symlink if it exists at all.Please read
/usr/ports/UPDATING (entry of 20070519) for the
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 13:39:28 +
Adam J Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Desmond Chapman wrote:
/usr/X11R6 exists, but it is not a symlink. Installation cannot
proceed. This looks like an incompletely removed old version of X.
In the current version, /usr/X11R6 must be a symlink if it
RW wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 13:39:28 +
Adam J Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Desmond Chapman wrote:
/usr/X11R6 exists, but it is not a symlink. Installation cannot
proceed. This looks like an incompletely removed old version of X.
In the current version, /usr/X11R6 must be a symlink
Adam J Richardson wrote:
RW wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 13:39:28 +
Adam J Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Desmond Chapman wrote:
/usr/X11R6 exists, but it is not a symlink. Installation cannot
proceed. This looks like an incompletely removed old version of X.
In the current version,
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:30:07 +
Desmond Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I am having multiple problems with the ports collection
# cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade
# make install clean
[ build log removed for brevity ]
=== Registering installation for
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:26:37PM -0500, Donald T Hayford wrote:
When trying to upgrade my ports I get the following message:
openssl-stable-0.9.7i conflicts with installed package(s):
openssl-beta-0.9.8a
Several ports (like openoffice.org-2xxx) require the beta version, while
kde
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:26:37PM -0500, Donald T Hayford wrote:
When trying to upgrade my ports I get the following message:
openssl-stable-0.9.7i conflicts with installed package(s):
openssl-beta-0.9.8a
Several ports (like openoffice.org-2xxx) require the
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 10:03:09PM -0500, Donald T Hayford wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:26:37PM -0500, Donald T Hayford wrote:
When trying to upgrade my ports I get the following message:
openssl-stable-0.9.7i conflicts with installed package(s):
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 10:03:09PM -0500, Donald T Hayford wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 07:26:37PM -0500, Donald T Hayford wrote:
When trying to upgrade my ports I get the following message:
openssl-stable-0.9.7i conflicts with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Today Peter Vereshagin had this to say:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:28:05 -0500 (CDT)
Denny White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to install cdrdao which is currently version
1.1.9, I believe, then failed, with message
saying there's a vulnerability.
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:28:05 -0500 (CDT)
Denny White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to install cdrdao which is currently version
1.1.9, I believe, then failed, with message
saying there's a vulnerability. There's a fixed
my question about the lagtime between fix and
inclusion. Meantime, still
13 matches
Mail list logo
