Re: Possible devd bug

2007-07-20 Thread Bartłomiej Rutkowski
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:41:46 +1000 Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: do you get the LINK_UP event at all? Otherwise, you should be able to figure out what the issue is with your config file ... Good luck, With rules as such: http://rafb.net/p/TJvMJy48.html I am getting output

Re: Possible devd bug

2007-07-20 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:28:55 +0200 (CEST) Bartłomiej Rutkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I have been playing with OpenOspf lately, and I came to a place, when I needed to ensure that an ethernet interface should always go into DOWN state when it loses its link (physically, for

Re: Possible devd bug

2007-07-20 Thread Bartłomiej Rutkowski
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:41:46 +1000 Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, I can confirm right now, that devd does not trigger, when you put eth interface into DOWN state by #ifconfig ifnameX down. Now, is that intentional behaviour or a bug? This makes those LINK_UP devd triggers

Re: Possible devd bug

2007-07-20 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:53:23 +0200 (CEST) Bartłomiej Rutkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:41:46 +1000 Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: do you get the LINK_UP event at all? Otherwise, you should be able to figure out what the issue is with your config

Re: Possible devd bug

2007-07-20 Thread Norberto Meijome
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:16:23 +0200 (CEST) Bartłomiej Rutkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Bartłomiej Rutkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Possible devd bug Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:16:23 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.0 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386