Re: Problem transporting signed emails

2004-05-09 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 11:57:05AM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote: I've been playing with signed emails (S/MIME, OpenSSL etc) but am running into an annoying problem: openssl smime -sign signs the text, but it adds ^M's at the end of the lines of the original text. When piping it through to the

Re: Problem transporting signed emails

2004-05-09 Thread Edwin Groothuis
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 11:49:38AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 11:57:05AM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote: I've been playing with signed emails (S/MIME, OpenSSL etc) but am running into an annoying problem: openssl smime -sign signs the text, but it adds ^M's at the

RE: Problem transporting signed emails

2004-05-09 Thread freebsd-questions
Giorgos Keramidas said on Sunday, 09 May 2004 03:34 UTC: Try base64-encoding the signed message, instead of piping it through as text/plain. That would mean that only S/MIME capable mail clients could read the resulting email, wouldn't it? When I S/MIME sign an email (such as this one) even

Re: Problem transporting signed emails

2004-05-08 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2004-05-09 11:57, Edwin Groothuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings, I've been playing with signed emails (S/MIME, OpenSSL etc) but am running into an annoying problem: openssl smime -sign signs the text, but it adds ^M's at the end of the lines of the original text. When piping it