Re: Security question - uids of 0

2004-08-17 Thread Justin L. Boss
toor is a base system user. It is a default user. It is used for several reason and is secure as long as no one can access your console directly. On Monday 16 August 2004 09:57 am, James A. Coulter wrote: The following appeared in my latest daily security run output: Checking for uids of 0:

Re: Security question - uids of 0

2004-08-16 Thread Volker Kindermann
Hi James, The following appeared in my latest daily security run output: Checking for uids of 0: root 0 toor 0 This is the first time I've seen this message. I checked /etc/passwd and found this: root:*:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/csh

Re: Security question - uids of 0

2004-08-16 Thread Siddhartha Jain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James A. Coulter wrote: | The following appeared in my latest daily security run output: | | Checking for uids of 0: | root 0 | toor 0 | | This is the first time I've seen this message. | | I checked /etc/passwd and found this: | |

Re: Security question - uids of 0

2004-08-16 Thread Radek Kozlowski
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 09:57:37AM -0500, James A. Coulter wrote: The following appeared in my latest daily security run output: Checking for uids of 0: root 0 toor 0 This is the first time I've seen this message. I checked /etc/passwd and found this:

Re: Security question - uids of 0

2004-08-16 Thread Jerry McAllister
The following appeared in my latest daily security run output: Checking for uids of 0: root 0 toor 0 This is the first time I've seen this message. I checked /etc/passwd and found this: root:*:0:0:Charlie :/root:/bin/csh toor:*:0:0:Bourne-again

Re: Security question - uids of 0

2004-08-16 Thread James A. Coulter
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 05:01:51PM +0200, Volker Kindermann wrote: Hi James, The following appeared in my latest daily security run output: Checking for uids of 0: root 0 toor 0 This is the first time I've seen this message. I checked /etc/passwd and found

Re: Security question

2003-11-20 Thread Kevin McKay
: Security question I don't know anything about using sysinstall for security patches/upgrades etc. WHat your looking for I think is cvsup. Please read the handbook on Using CVSUP to get the latests source updates, security patches for your release and even updating to a different RELEASE

Re: Security question

2003-11-20 Thread Bryan Cassidy
looked all through the handbook and faq's but could not find a definitive answer. Thanks Kevin McKay - Original Message - From: Bryan Cassidy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Kevin McKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 11:18 PM Subject: Re: Security

Re: Security question

2003-11-20 Thread Peter Risdon
Kevin McKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You normally need to run the sysinstall from the version you're updating to. You could configure your system's sysinstall to load in the later version, and it should be compatible, but I don't know the syntax for that offhand... For reference,

Re: Security question

2003-11-19 Thread Bryan Cassidy
I've never used sysinstall for anything but installing the operating system. I'm sure what you want is cvsup. Use the /usr/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile for updating source then follow instructions in handbook on make world to update the system. On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 21:09:03 -0800 Kevin

Re: Security question

2003-11-19 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Kevin McKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have read through the documentation but have not been able to find a definite answer. I am running a pretty core install of 5.1 minimal + bind9, postfix, apache, ssh, no ports collection. Here is my question. When I run the binary update from sysinstall

Re: Security question

2003-11-19 Thread Kevin McKay
So it will not just grab the latest patched binaries for 5.1? I am not sure I understand. Is it just for updating between releases and not for keeping the current release up to date? Kevin Lowell Gilbert wrote: Kevin McKay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have read through the documentation

Re: Security question

2003-11-19 Thread Bryan Cassidy
I don't know anything about using sysinstall for security patches/upgrades etc. WHat your looking for I think is cvsup. Please read the handbook on Using CVSUP to get the latests source updates, security patches for your release and even updating to a different RELEASE or -CURRENT or -STABLE. On

Re: Security question

2003-11-19 Thread Bryan Cassidy
I don't know anything about using sysinstall for security patches/upgrades etc. WHat your looking for I think is cvsup. Please read the handbook on Using CVSUP to get the latests source updates, security patches for your release and even updating to a different RELEASE or -CURRENT or -STABLE. On

Re: Security question (simple).

2003-08-22 Thread lukek
I wonder if the better policy is to not run inherently insecure applications to begin with. In theory if no-one can get to that box or make use of that application from the internet then your only threats become internal ones. Just for curiosity sake what does nmap tell you about your