Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have always suspected that unknowingly utilizing the already
out-of-date tree from the initial install is probably what causes
most newcomers' problems with ports.
My experience is exactly the opposite. The biggest problem I've
had with ports
On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 06:08:42 -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
My experience is exactly the opposite. The biggest problem I've
had with ports came from trying to follow the recommended approach
of updating the tree after installing, before trying to build
anything.
This is a _conditional_
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 07:28:18 +0100
Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 06:08:42 -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
My experience is exactly the opposite. The biggest problem I've
had with ports came from trying to follow the recommended approach
of updating the tree after installing,
I agree, the ports are *amazing*. Even when installing a major component
like kde4. If you have your base system set up correctly this very complex
task will generally complete flawlessly. For a first-time install you can
accept most of the default options when configuring, but it's probably not
a
then, as the system must be configured?, I thought as I was was perfect. I have
a laptop with intel core i5.
PS: I think that occupying FreeBSD or OpenBSD, and you should consider ;)
Zantgo
El 31-10-2011, a las 6:12, Joe Gain joe.g...@gmail.com escribió:
I agree, the ports are *amazing*.
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:45:44 -0300, Zantgo wrote:
then, as the system must be configured?, I thought as I was
was perfect. I have a laptop with intel core i5.
The ports should work without any further configuration
change, no matter if you've installed via Internet or
from an installation
Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:45:44 -0300, Zantgo wrote:
then, as the system must be configured?, I thought as I was
was perfect. I have a laptop with intel core i5.
The ports should work without any further configuration
change, no matter if you've installed via Internet or
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Zantgo wrote:
What happens is that I tried to install things on the ports, but
almost no one serves me, I've only been able to install firefox, I
tried also install KDE, GNOME and KFCE, but I have been many errors,
commonly solocionables, for example I had to modify
El 30-10-2011, a las 19:55, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com escribió:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Zantgo wrote:
What happens is that I tried to install things on the ports, but almost no
one serves me, I've only been able to install firefox, I tried also install
KDE, GNOME and KFCE, but I have
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Zantgo wrote:
El 30-10-2011, a las 19:55, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com escribi?:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Zantgo wrote:
What happens is that I tried to install things on the ports, but almost no one serves me, I've only been able
to install firefox, I tried also install
u . . . this person has been doing similar
hold-my-hand-I-do-not-want-to-take-the-time kinda thing on the oBSD
lists recently.
On 10/30/11, Zantgo zan...@gmail.com wrote:
El 30-10-2011, a las 19:55, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com escribió:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Zantgo wrote:
What
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 18:19:16 -0300, Zantgo wrote:
What happens is that I tried to install things on the ports,
but almost no one serves me, I've only been able to install
firefox, I tried also install KDE, GNOME and KFCE, but I have
been many errors, commonly solocionables, for example I had
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Zantgo zan...@gmail.com wrote:
What happens is that I tried to install things on the ports, but almost no
one serves me, I've only been able to install firefox, I tried also install
KDE, GNOME and KFCE, but I have been many errors, commonly solocionables, for
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 22:36:44 -0400, Alejandro Imass wrote:
For very large packages such as the graphics system, open or libre
office etc. it's much better to use binary versions via pkg_add. It's
a waste of time to compile these very large suites and most of the
time you will get the config
14 matches
Mail list logo