On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 10:12:17PM -0700, paul beard wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can try increasing the timeout by editing the relevant kernel
source, but if it's failing to reply to the I/O after 30 seconds then
something is
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no bug in gcc. Your system does not have enough memory to
run the compilation job, so you are thrashing it severely. Try
turning down the CFLAGS optimization level, or use a precompiled
package from the FTP
paul beard wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 1:28 AM, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no bug in gcc. Your system does not have enough memory to
run the compilation job, so you are thrashing it severely. Try
turning down the CFLAGS optimization level, or use a precompiled
package
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 01:02:35PM -0700, paul beard wrote:
I see a lot of these as my system grinds to a halt. It never crashes
(I reboot it when it gets really boggy . . .
May 23 11:41:13 stinky kernel: swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer:
bufobj: 0, blkno: 49155, size: 4096
May 23
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can try increasing the timeout by editing the relevant kernel
source, but if it's failing to reply to the I/O after 30 seconds then
something is drastically overloaded on your system.
Well, not much is running, and
