On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:32:23 +
Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul B. Mahol wrote:
On 11/26/08, Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Bonus points if you come up with a patch to do this: in most
cases it will be a simple
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 06:40:34PM +, Masoom Shaikh wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:56:31PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
most of the programs
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Bonus points if you come up with a patch to do this: in most cases it
will be a simple matter of changing the port's do-install: target to
use INSTALL_* macros instead of cp/bsdtar etc. This would be a good
project to get some familiarity with the
On 11/26/08, Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Bonus points if you come up with a patch to do this: in most cases it
will be a simple matter of changing the port's do-install: target to
use INSTALL_* macros instead of cp/bsdtar etc. This
Paul B. Mahol wrote:
On 11/26/08, Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Bonus points if you come up with a patch to do this: in most cases it
will be a simple matter of changing the port's do-install: target to
use INSTALL_* macros instead of
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 08:42:12AM +, Masoom Shaikh wrote:
most of the programs installed from ports have large binary size on disk
stripping em all reduces their size dramatically
I cannot see the reason for
On 11/17/08, Masoom Shaikh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:56:31PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
most of the programs installed from ports have large binary size on
disk
stripping em all
On Nov 18, 2008, at 8:45 AM, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
And what about /usr/local/lib/** ?
Interesting. I found that only 11 are stripped on my system compared
to 272 not stripped
That is pretty much the opposite of the ratio I round in /usr/local/
bin where there were something like 350
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 08:42:12AM +, Masoom Shaikh wrote:
most of the programs installed from ports have large binary size on disk
stripping em all reduces their size dramatically
I cannot see the reason for not stripping them by default ?
do I miss anything ?
I haven't seen anyone
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:56:31PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
most of the programs installed from ports have large binary size on disk
stripping em all reduces their size dramatically
I cannot see the reason for not stripping them by default ?
me too
do I miss anything ?
no.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:56:31PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
most of the programs installed from ports have large binary size on disk
stripping em all reduces their size dramatically
I cannot see the reason
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 06:40:34PM +, Masoom Shaikh wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 12:56:31PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
most of the programs installed from ports have large binary size on disk
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Bonus points if you come up with a patch to do this: in most cases it
will be a simple matter of changing the port's do-install: target to
use INSTALL_* macros instead of cp/bsdtar etc. This would be a good
project to get some familiarity with the ports tree.
Would it be
Masoom Shaikh wrote:
most of the programs installed from ports have large binary size on disk
stripping em all reduces their size dramatically
I cannot see the reason for not stripping them by default ?
do I miss anything ?
Yes. Binaries installed from the ports system /are/ already
most of the programs installed from ports have large binary size on disk
stripping em all reduces their size dramatically
I cannot see the reason for not stripping them by default ?
me too
do I miss anything ?
no.
___
15 matches
Mail list logo