Charles Swiger írta:
On May 25, 2006, at 9:39 AM, Eric wrote:
what MTA are you using? i'm wondering why your server accepted the
email in the first place.
Yes, well, that question implies the right direction for a solution:
you want to reject spam before trying to deliver it, rather than
Nagy László Zsolt wrote:
Charles Swiger írta:
Yes, well, that question implies the right direction for a solution:
you want to reject spam before trying to deliver it, rather than
accepting it and then being responsible for bouncing it back.
I'm using postfix (the most up to date version from
Nagy László Zsolt wrote:
Charles Swiger írta:
On May 25, 2006, at 9:39 AM, Eric wrote:
what MTA are you using? i'm wondering why your server accepted the
email in the first place.
Yes, well, that question implies the right direction for a solution:
you want to reject spam before trying to
Hello,
I might be offtopic...
I always get a long daily output from periodic.
Mail in local queue:
-Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time -Sender/Recipient---
1D3C91DD4AA45937 Tue May 23 10:54:42 MAILER-DAEMON
(connect to onmail02.ongov.net[12.33.98.207]: Operation timed
User Gandalf wrote:
Hello,
I might be offtopic...
I always get a long daily output from periodic.
Mail in local queue:
-Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time -Sender/Recipient---
1D3C91DD4AA45937 Tue May 23 10:54:42 MAILER-DAEMON
(connect to
Chuck Swiger wrote:
User Gandalf wrote:
Hello,
I might be offtopic...
I always get a long daily output from periodic.
Mail in local queue:
-Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time -Sender/Recipient---
1D3C91DD4AA45937 Tue May 23 10:54:42 MAILER-DAEMON
(connect to
On May 25, 2006, at 9:39 AM, Eric wrote:
what MTA are you using? i'm wondering why your server accepted the
email in the first place.
Yes, well, that question implies the right direction for a solution:
you want to reject spam before trying to deliver it, rather than
accepting it and then
