In the last episode (Feb 25), mojo fms said:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Frank Shute wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 03:21:28PM -0800, mojo fms wrote:
> > > last pid: 11406; load averages: 0.07, 0.02, 0.00
> > > 23 processes: 1 running, 22 sleeping
> > > CPU: 0.0% user, 0.0%
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Frank Shute wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 03:21:28PM -0800, mojo fms wrote:
> >
> > last pid: 11406; load averages: 0.07, 0.02,
> > 0.00 up 2+20:54:15 15:36:35
> > 23 processes: 1 running, 22 sleeping
> > CPU: 0.0% user, 0.0% ni
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 03:21:28PM -0800, mojo fms wrote:
>
> last pid: 11406; load averages: 0.07, 0.02,
> 0.00 up 2+20:54:15 15:36:35
> 23 processes: 1 running, 22 sleeping
> CPU: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle
>
> That is what it
last pid: 11406; load averages: 0.07, 0.02,
0.00 up 2+20:54:15 15:36:35
23 processes: 1 running, 22 sleeping
CPU: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle
That is what it is displaying, the load adverage isnt it, its just the CPU
stats. It a
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 01:07:54PM -0800, mojo fms wrote:
>
> What would cause top to report back 0.0% cpu usage across the top row? It
> shows the minmal adverage and max correctly and seems to show the correct
> amount for the processes.
How about showing us the lines of top that seem to be a p
What would cause top to report back 0.0% cpu usage across the top row? It
shows the minmal adverage and max correctly and seems to show the correct
amount for the processes.
Copyright (c) 1992-2009 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
