I have this interesting behavior in the top utility on _both_ my 7.1
and 8.0 FreeBSD servers (updated to latest patches). The interesting
behavior happens only when my kernel is compiled with the ULE
scheduler. It does not happen when the kernel uses the old BSD
scheduler.
Here is a link
have a stock 7.0 release.
I rebuilt the kernel with ULE scheduler, I think.
How can I tell if it is running ULE or 4BSD??
David R. Stegner
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:17:28 -0700, Dave Stegner dsteg...@earthlink.net
wrote:
I rebuilt the kernel with ULE scheduler, I think.
How can I tell if it is running ULE or 4BSD??
I think that's what you're looking for:
% sysctl kern.sched.name
kern.sched.name: ULE
Hi,
I decided to give the ULE scheduler a try a while ago (April 28).
when I last built 6-STABLE
Anyhow it seems great. I'm running a 2.4GHz Celeron with
512MB RAM and two 40GB, PATA disks. Right now I'm running
both a GNOME and a KDE session, I've got Thunderbird and
Evolution open, Firefox
, with the 4BSD? is the ULE scheduler suited
for a server setup as well (my server is also SMP), or is this something that
should be kept to a desktop?
thanks,
jonathan horne
On Sunday 07 May 2006 04:43, Duane Whitty wrote:
Hi,
I decided to give the ULE scheduler a try a while ago (April 28
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 06:43:14AM -0300, Duane Whitty wrote:
Hi,
I decided to give the ULE scheduler a try a while ago (April 28).
when I last built 6-STABLE
Anyhow it seems great. I'm running a 2.4GHz Celeron with
512MB RAM and two 40GB, PATA disks. Right now I'm running
both
configuration on the same box, with the 4BSD? is the ULE scheduler suited
for a server setup as well (my server is also SMP), or is this something that
should be kept to a desktop?
thanks,
jonathan horne
My system is a desktop and yes I was previously using the 4BSD
scheduler. As for
whether
the CPU affinity for processes
in the
FreeBSD 6 ULE scheduler.
That's because you can't. ULE gives lower performance on the
workloads I have tested anyway. This may be fixed in the future.
Kris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
I can't find any information on how to set the CPU affinity for processes in
the
FreeBSD 6 ULE scheduler.
On the linux box, which we're moving from, I have dual Xeon HTT's that I have
JBoss scheduled round-robin with the CPU affinity set to the first two
processors,
nice -15. I have Postgres
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 04:16:31PM -0600, Jon Brisbin wrote:
I can't find any information on how to set the CPU affinity for processes in
the
FreeBSD 6 ULE scheduler.
That's because you can't. ULE gives lower performance on the
workloads I have tested anyway. This may be fixed
information on how to set the CPU affinity for
processes in the
FreeBSD 6 ULE scheduler.
That's because you can't. ULE gives lower performance on the
workloads I have tested anyway. This may be fixed in the future.
Kris
___
freebsd-questions
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 07:08:12PM -0500, Ian Lord wrote:
Are you saying that ULE is slower then 4BSD ?
I'm new to this and when I compiled my kernel, it was clear ULE was
a better alternative for performance then 4BSD
Yes, in the workloads I have tested. Others have reported similar
musikcom wrote:
Hello!
I have some trouble with ULE scheduler. I have installed FreeBSD 5.3
When I try to use ULE scheduler (by editing GENERIC file), the message
The SCHED_ULE scheduler is broken. Please use SCHED_4BSD message
appear.
I do these steps:
cd /sys/i386/confOK
edit GENERIC
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 05:50:21PM +0600, musikcom wrote:
Hello!
I have some trouble with ULE scheduler. I have installed
FreeBSD 5.3 When I try to use ULE scheduler (by editing
GENERIC file), the message The SCHED_ULE scheduler is
broken. Please use SCHED_4BSD message appear.
You get
Peter Farmer schrieb:
From http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/errata.html
(1 Nov 2004) The ULE scheduler described in the release notes has been
completely disabled to discourage its use because it has stability
problems.
HTH
Is there a way to explicitely enable it for testing purposes
O. Hartmann wrote:
Peter Farmer schrieb:
From http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/errata.html
(1 Nov 2004) The ULE scheduler described in the release notes has been
completely disabled to discourage its use because it has stability
problems.
HTH
Is there a way to explicitely enable
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 04:46:20PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
Peter Farmer schrieb:
From http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/errata.html
(1 Nov 2004) The ULE scheduler described in the release notes has been
completely disabled to discourage its use because it has stability
problems
17 matches
Mail list logo
