On Monday, July 29, 2013 3:31:49 am varanasi sainath wrote:
Hello,
I am writing a kernel module in which I am trying to connect to a UNIX
socket
(UNIX domain sockets use the file system as their address name space).
Kernel module (loadable) acts as a client and User mode program acts
Hello,
I am writing a kernel module in which I am trying to connect to a UNIX
socket
(UNIX domain sockets use the file system as their address name space).
Kernel module (loadable) acts as a client and User mode program acts as
server,
I have loaded the module using kldload and communication
On 29/07/2013 08:31, varanasi sainath wrote:
Hello,
I am writing a kernel module in which I am trying to connect to a UNIX
socket
(UNIX domain sockets use the file system as their address name space).
Kernel module (loadable) acts as a client and User mode program acts as
server,
I have loaded
I think I found the reason for the reported error. In the file
'pracct.c' variable 'acdata' is declared as 'struct acct'. This
structure must be in header 'acct.h', in sub-directory
'/usr/include/sys'. But it is not. In that header there are two similar
structures instead: 'struct acctv2' and
12.12.2011 20:35, Matt Mullins wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrkoc.kw...@gmail.com wrote:
10.12.2011 04:22, Matt Mullins wrote:
auth optional pam_deny.so
auth sufficient pam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass
auth sufficient pam_krb5.so no_warn try_first_pass
Why you
Hi to users of UNIX!
What unix program is available for a check of a configuration file of
the kernel?
I`ve got some trouble with configuration of my new kernel but i`d
like to find my mistakes myself
But if those mistakes will't be eliminated independently, i will write
to you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Oleg simonoff wrote:
|
|Hi to users of UNIX!
|
|What unix program is available for a check of a configuration file of the
|kernel?
|
|I`ve got some trouble with configuration of my new kernel but i`d like to
|find my mistakes
10.12.2011 04:22, Matt Mullins wrote:
For my systems, the canonical source of authentication information is
a Kerberos server, but I also want to support old-fashioned Unix
passwords for a handful of users (including myself) just in case the
Kerberos system is unreachable. I'm having a bit
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Volodymyr Kostyrko c.kw...@gmail.com wrote:
10.12.2011 04:22, Matt Mullins wrote:
auth optional pam_deny.so
auth sufficient pam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass
auth sufficient pam_krb5.so no_warn try_first_pass
Why you just haven't changed the last line to
For my systems, the canonical source of authentication information is
a Kerberos server, but I also want to support old-fashioned Unix
passwords for a handful of users (including myself) just in case the
Kerberos system is unreachable. I'm having a bit of trouble adjusting
to the semantics
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 22:04:17 -0500
Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
I looked briefly one night at SDF.org.
http://sdf.org/?join
For a contribution of, like, $1.00, you get full access, and I suspect
that they're running FreeBSD (I haven't actually paid to see, but
among the list of commands
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:29:26 -0300
Carlos A. M. dos Santos unixma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
For reasons hard to explain I need to set-up a Unix (preferably
FreeBSD) shell account that I can access from anywhere.
Arbornet and PBS were the first names that came to my mind, but I'm
open
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Carlos A. M. dos Santos
unixma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
For reasons hard to explain I need to set-up a Unix (preferably
FreeBSD) shell account that I can access from anywhere.
Arbornet and PBS were the first names that came to my mind, but I'm
open to other
Hi,
For reasons hard to explain I need to set-up a Unix (preferably
FreeBSD) shell account that I can access from anywhere.
Arbornet and PBS were the first names that came to my mind, but I'm
open to other options. I don't mind paying a regular fee for it.
Privacy and security are my main
Hi,
On 27.09.2011 14:29, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
Hi,
For reasons hard to explain I need to set-up a Unix (preferably
FreeBSD) shell account that I can access from anywhere.
Arbornet and PBS were the first names that came to my mind, but I'm
open to other options. I don't mind paying
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Kruppa, Peter Ulrich ulr...@pukruppa.dewrote:
Hi,
On 27.09.2011 14:29, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
Hi,
For reasons hard to explain I need to set-up a Unix (preferably
FreeBSD) shell account that I can access from anywhere.
Arbornet and PBS were
On 9/27/11 8:29 PM, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
For reasons hard to explain I need to set-up a Unix (preferably
FreeBSD) shell account that I can access from anywhere.
I've tried Devio.us and it is great as a generic shell ... It even allow
you to setup a personal webpage on it :)
http
use chat@
Thanks
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
Reply below, not above; Indent with ; Cumulative like a play script.
Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 02:25:52AM +0200, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2011-06-17 18:28, Chad Perrin skrev:
The fact this is not applicable everywhere is the reason for things
like the CC0 waiver, however.
What is CC0?
http://creativecommons.org/choose/zero/
--
Chad Perrin [ original content
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Robert Bonomi
bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
I'ts _MUCH_ simpler, to just sign and date a copy of the work, and have a
notary public 'witness' the signature.
True.
Without the service of a public registry of copyrighted works that (I think)
only the US
From cpgh...@cordula.ws Sat Jun 18 08:28:25 2011
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:28:24 +0200
Subject: Re: free sco unix
From: C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws
To: Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Robert Bonomi
bon
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
From cpgh...@cordula.ws Sat Jun 18 08:28:25 2011
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:28:24 +0200
Subject: Re: free sco unix
From: C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws
To: Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com
Cc: freebsd
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 03:28:24PM +0200, C. P. Ghost wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Robert Bonomi
bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
I'ts _MUCH_ simpler, to just sign and date a copy of the work, and have a
notary public 'witness' the signature.
True.
Without the service of a
On 6/18/11 10:36 AM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 03:28:24PM +0200, C. P. Ghost wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Robert Bonomi
bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
I'ts _MUCH_ simpler, to just sign and date a copy of the work, and have a
notary public 'witness' the
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 06:14:03AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:35:54 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
I've noticed that your mail user agent is including quoted parties'
email addresses in the quote notification. In the text immediately
following this brief paragraph, for
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 06:59:57AM +0200, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2011-06-17 00:20, Daniel Staal skrev:
--As of June 16, 2011 11:21:34 PM +0400, Peter Vereshagin is alleged
to have said:
(And note that a pure list of facts can't be copyrighted: The phone
book is often an example. It's just a
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 07:22:31AM +0200, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2011-06-17 06:53, Adam Vande More skrev:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Copyright you get without registration and without payment, and one
can't give it up.
Again, registration is pretty important if
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:28:51AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
Registration aids enforcement. Of course, there's always the poor man's
copyright registration approach, where the moment you have something you
would like to protect by copyright, you can seal it up in an envelope and
mail it to
On Jun 17, 2011, at 9:28 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
Where i live no need to register, you get copyright if the stuff
fulfills certain criteria, originality is one.
Registration aids enforcement. Of course, there's always the poor man's
copyright registration approach, where the moment you have
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:57:20AM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jun 17, 2011, at 9:28 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
Where i live no need to register, you get copyright if the stuff
fulfills certain criteria, originality is one.
Registration aids enforcement. Of course, there's always the poor
On Jun 17, 2011, at 10:59 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
Sigh. If you'd ever actually filed a copyright registration or
transfer form, you would discover that one needs to get them notarized.
(Documenting that a certain document was available and signed at a
specific date is what a notary public is
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:48:25AM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jun 17, 2011, at 10:59 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
The poor man's copyright approach is, I believe, less certain and
effective than registration, but if there is a dispute over proper
claim of copyright, anything you can do to
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Fri Jun 17 12:22:42 2011
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:03:47 -0500
From: Alex Stangl a...@stangl.us
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: free sco unix
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:28:51AM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
Registration aids enforcement
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 05:02:09PM -0500, Robert Bonomi wrote:
OK, time for somebody who really knows about this stuff to wade in.
[snip]
Thanks for much more clearly stating, in much greater detail, exactly
what I was trying to say -- and for adding a bunch of additional detail.
--
Chad
--As of June 17, 2011 5:02:09 PM -0500, Robert Bonomi is alleged to have
said:
4) In the U.S., one can officially register copyright on something up to
SIX MONTHS _after_ first 'publication'.
--As for the rest, it is mine.
Actually, you can register it at any time after it has been
patents, such as patenting the
word or and forcing everybody to pay a license fee for
using it, there is a certain barrier that prohibits
copyright claims on too simple things.
When a lot of people think of Unix as an OS these days they probably
think of SCO; And another German word comes to mind
On 6/17/2011 1:57 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jun 17, 2011, at 9:28 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
You assert this claim as well, but it's not at all clear whether
anything but works created by government employees can be placed in
the public domain.
On 6/17/2011 2:48 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jun 17, 2011, at 10:59 AM, Chad Perrin wrote:
Sigh. If you'd ever actually filed a copyright registration or
transfer form, you would discover that one needs to get them notarized.
(Documenting that a certain document was available and signed at a
Le 15/06/2011 à 22:34:23+0200, Thomas Hansen a écrit
one of my mates teacher says that unix is free and your system running
like UnixWare / SCO UNIX and and that unix is free
Do your BSD kernel run the same unix kernel as unixware
Take a look :
http://www.levenez.com/unix
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/15 17:08:31 -0400 Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net = To Thomas
Hansen :
CB FreeBSD is a UNIX-like clone, which is indeed free, whereas UNIX is
CB still the proprietary property of ATT/Bell Labs.
unix is a trademark of novell.com.
73
On 16/06/2011 13:52, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/15 17:08:31 -0400 Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net = To Thomas
Hansen :
CB FreeBSD is a UNIX-like clone, which is indeed free, whereas UNIX is
CB still the proprietary property of ATT
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 09:22:43 AM Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 16/06/2011 13:52, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/15 17:08:31 -0400 Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net = To
Thomas Hansen : CB FreeBSD is a UNIX-like clone, which is indeed
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 14:22:43 +0100 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk =
To freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
MS CB FreeBSD is a UNIX-like clone, which is indeed free, whereas UNIX is
MS CB still the proprietary property of ATT/Bell Labs.
MS
to the
As I suspected ;-)
RS So, if you wanted to call your software UNIX you would need to contact
Open
RS Group and make sure that your software licences the trademark, and complies
This will require some efforts from Open Group. Does FreeBSD Foundation pay for
that?
RS with the standard
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:29:42 AM Peter Vereshagin wrote:
There should be a difference recognized between own a Unix trademark by
http://www.unix.org/trademark.html and ownership of the Unix copyrights
by http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100330152829622 where I'm
pass
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:47:32 AM Peter Vereshagin wrote:
This will require some efforts from Open Group. Does FreeBSD Foundation pay
for that?
Not necessary. FreeBSD does not use (want to use/need to use) the UNIX
trademark and according to the USL vs. BSDi court case, FreeBSD does
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 11:54:05 -0400 Robert Simmons rsimmo...@gmail.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
RS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright
RS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark
I'll surely will when I'll have some to trade ;-)
RS
--
From: Robert Simmons rsimmo...@gmail.com
thrown out of court. Additionally, the source code is GPL, so even
if in the
fictional world of Linus taking the trademark elsewhere, you can
fork the code
and call it
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:31:19 PM Reko Turja wrote:
In that fictional world MySQL needed a fork and some GPL'd programs
have been retroactively made completely closed source, forking denied
after taking the issue into court...
I thought that Sun reversed that decision in 2008. Can you
On 16 June 2011 17:47, Robert Simmons rsimmo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:31:19 PM Reko Turja wrote:
In that fictional world MySQL needed a fork and some GPL'd programs
have been retroactively made completely closed source, forking denied
after taking the issue into
On Thu, June 16, 2011 12:20 pm, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 11:54:05 -0400 Robert Simmons rsimmo...@gmail.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
RS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright
RS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 13:36:32 -0400 Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
DS RS Copyright pertains to the source code. Trademark pertains to the use
DS of
DS RS signs, symbols, names, logos, etc.
DS
DS Source code itself
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 02:22:43PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 16/06/2011 13:52, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
unix is a trademark of novell.com.
Unix (note capitalization) is actually a trademark of the Open Group:
http://www.unix.org/
In case it was lost in the informative explanations
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:20:11PM +0400, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
But both are just words/phrases, right?
Here's an example of the difference:
UNIX, the name, is a trademark. We can use it all we like here, speaking
about the UNIX trademark, its applicability, who owns the trademark, and
so
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 12:46:20 -0600 Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
CP But both are just words/phrases, right?
CP
CP Here's an example of the difference:
Good example, it's on-topic ;-)
CP UNIX, the name
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 12:30:07 -0600 Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
CP * The UNIX source code's copyright is held by . . . damn. It keeps
I always told this name is a kind of Black Label. Companies to hold it use
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:29:42 +0400, Peter Vereshagin pe...@vereshagin.org
wrote:
Lawyers are so lawyers ;-)
Two lawyers, three opinions. :-)
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
--As of June 16, 2011 11:21:34 PM +0400, Peter Vereshagin is alleged to
have said:
CP UNIX, the name, is a trademark. We can use it all we like here,
speaking
Do we need a license to use it? ;-)
According to what I recall of my 'business law for managers' classes: As
long as we don't
it to
identify.
That's correct, and you can see an evidence directly on
the FreeBSD main web page:
Based on BSD UNIX(R)
This indicates that the name UNIX is a registered
trademark (which is registered to its owner).
It's extremely hard to claim a copyright on a single word: You have to meet
I am out of the office until June 20th. I will only have intermittent access to
email. I will read and reply to your message when I get back to the office.
If you need assistance with a Berkeley DB or Product Management issue while I
am away, please contact ashok.jo...@oracle.com.
--As of June 17, 2011 12:47:45 AM +0200, Polytropon is alleged to have said:
(And note that a pure list of facts can't be copyrighted: The phone book
is often an example. It's just a list of names and numbers.)
Interesting, never tought of that, but sounds obvious.
--As for the rest, it
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 18:20:43 -0400 Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net = To Peter Vereshagin :
DS CP UNIX, the name, is a trademark. We can use it all we like here,
DS speaking
DS
DS Do we need a license to use it? ;-)
DS
DS According to what I recall of my
On Jun 16, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
And does FreeBSD Foundation own its FreeBSD UNIX then? If it does, did it pay
for it? Does it certify its FreeBSD as a UNIX and how much does it pay?
The FreeBSD Foundation is a non-profit organization which supports and
represents
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 04:07:08 +0400, Peter Vereshagin pe...@vereshagin.org
wrote:
And does FreeBSD Foundation own its FreeBSD UNIX then? If it does, did it pay
for it? Does it certify its FreeBSD as a UNIX and how much does it pay?
Basically, the main page says based on, this states a
fact
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 07:43:59PM -0400, Daniel Staal wrote:
(The other common case in the USA is road maps. A simple 'lines following
their geographic contours, labeled' is a set of facts. One result of this
is that most road maps in the US either are missing some minor roads, or
have
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 02:50:40AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 04:07:08 +0400, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
It's just a matter of a freedom to speech to me. And to everyone else
I believe.
Copyright and ownership of creation just makes sure that someone can't
express OTHER's
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:03:16 -0600, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 02:50:40AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 04:07:08 +0400, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
It's just a matter of a freedom to speech to me. And to everyone else
I believe.
I've noticed that your mail user agent is including quoted parties' email
addresses in the quote notification. In the text immediately following
this brief paragraph, for instance, my email address was included after
my name. I would appreciate it if you would configure your mail user
agent to
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:35:54 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
I've noticed that your mail user agent is including quoted parties' email
addresses in the quote notification. In the text immediately following
this brief paragraph, for instance, my email address was included after
my name. I would
2011-06-16 19:36, Daniel Staal skrev:
On Thu, June 16, 2011 12:20 pm, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 11:54:05 -0400 Robert Simmonsrsimmo...@gmail.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
RS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright
RS
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Bernt Hansson be...@bah.homeip.netwrote:
Unless you work the trademark in you have to pay to register the name.
I'm not sure by what mean by work the trademark in but every business is
entitled to use tm or sm identification without registration. However by
2011-06-17 00:20, Daniel Staal skrev:
--As of June 16, 2011 11:21:34 PM +0400, Peter Vereshagin is alleged to
have said:
(And note that a pure list of facts can't be copyrighted: The phone book
is often an example. It's just a list of names and numbers.)
Which is copyrighted, all databases
2011-06-17 06:53, Adam Vande More skrev:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Bernt Hanssonbe...@bah.homeip.netwrote:
Unless you work the trademark in you have to pay to register the name.
I'm not sure by what mean by work the trademark in but every business is
entitled to use tm or sm
2011-06-16 20:30, Chad Perrin skrev:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 02:22:43PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 16/06/2011 13:52, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
unix is a trademark of novell.com.
Unix (note capitalization) is actually a trademark of the Open Group:
http://www.unix.org/
In EU
one of my mates teacher says that unix is free and your system running
like UnixWare / SCO UNIX and and that unix is free
Do your BSD kernel run the same unix kernel as unixware
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
* Thomas Hansen t...@danskdatacenter.dk [2011-06-15 22:34:23 +0200]:
one of my mates teacher says that unix is free and your system running
like UnixWare / SCO UNIX and and that unix is free
Do your BSD kernel run the same unix kernel as unixware
FreeBSD is a UNIX-like clone, which
On 15/06/2011 21:34, Thomas Hansen wrote:
one of my mates teacher says that unix is free and your system running
like UnixWare / SCO UNIX and and that unix is free
Some Unix is free (the best sorts), others are most certainly not free
at all.
FreeBSD is pretty much the opposite end
-- Forwarded message --
From: Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net
Date: Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: free sco unix
To: Thomas Hansen t...@danskdatacenter.dk
'y' and 't' are too close in mutt :(
* Thomas Hansen t...@danskdatacenter.dk [2011-06-16 00:07:11 +0200
didn't know Windows had that. In your friend's defense, I use Windows every
day (at work) and I can't always remember what things are called. Especially
since MS changes terminology every now and then, evidently just for the hell
of it.
1. I know that Windows is an OS, and Linux/Unix as well
' as a search term.
Although I am familiar with basic computer operation, I've been trying
to understand a very experienced programmer friend that mixes Linux/Unix
terminology in his vocabulary under the assumption that everyone knows
the language.
Being familiar only with general knowledge
I need to count number of connections to php's cgi unix socket (created with
spawn-fci). When nginx initiates a connection to cgi socket one of spawned
php processes accepts this connection, processes input and outputs data. But
number of processes is limited and i want to be able to monitor
I found several directories whose permissions where set to
dr-s--S--T 2 user group 512 Feb 22 2010 .procmail/
All were .procmail which is what we set for procmail logging and supporting
recipes. In reading 'man ls' it seems (to me) this might result from losing the
execute bit on the
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:32:40 -0400 (EDT), d...@safeport.com wrote:
I found several directories whose permissions where set to
dr-s--S--T 2 user group 512 Feb 22 2010 .procmail/
All were .procmail which is what we set for procmail logging and supporting
recipes. In reading 'man ls'
On Sep 14, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:32:40 -0400 (EDT), d...@safeport.com wrote:
I found several directories whose permissions where set to
dr-s--S--T 2 user group 512 Feb 22 2010 .procmail/
All were .procmail which is what we set for procmail
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:32:40 -0400 (EDT), d...@safeport.com wrote:
I found several directories whose permissions where set to
dr-s--S--T 2 user group 512 Feb 22 2010 .procmail/
All were .procmail which is what we set for procmail logging and
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Sep 14, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:32:40 -0400 (EDT), d...@safeport.com wrote:
I found several directories whose permissions where set to
dr-s--S--T 2 user group 512 Feb 22 2010 .procmail/
All were .procmail
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 11:04:58 -0700, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
On Sep 14, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:32:40 -0400 (EDT), d...@safeport.com wrote:
I found several directories whose permissions where set to
dr-s--S--T 2 user group 512 Feb 22
On Sep 14, 2010, at 11:16 AM, d...@safeport.com wrote:
A bit of experimentation suggests that chmod 7500 .procmail are the
permissions involved, which are silly. No group permissions enabled means
setgid is meaningless, and I don't see any value for using the sticky bit
here, either. Try
Today I decided to make a backup of some of my unix data to an XP
machine in preparation for a migration.
I set windows XP backup running and when it started backing up files in
my home directory I noticed that it set u-x permissions on all of the
files.
Directories are unaffected.
If I use
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:39:19AM +1000, Danny Carroll wrote:
Today I decided to make a backup of some of my unix data to an XP
machine in preparation for a migration.
I set windows XP backup running and when it started backing up files in
my home directory I noticed that it set u-x
On 7/09/2010 12:00 PM, Frank Shute wrote:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:39:19AM +1000, Danny Carroll wrote:
Today I decided to make a backup of some of my unix data to an XP
machine in preparation for a migration.
I set windows XP backup running and when it started backing up files in
my home
. Please respond also to my eMail address, thank you very much.
2009-09-03 19:47:49: (mod_access.c.135) -- mod_access_uri_handler called
2009-09-03 19:47:49: (mod_fastcgi.c.3644) handling it in mod_fastcgi
2009-09-03 19:47:49: (mod_fastcgi.c.1742) connect failed: Connection
refused on unix:/tmp
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Karl Vogel
vogelke+u...@pobox.comvogelke%2bu...@pobox.com
wrote:
On Sun, 17 May 2009 09:12:57 -0700,
Kelly Jones kelly.terry.jo...@gmail.com said:
K I like this plan because it does versioned backups, and doesn't backup
K identical files twice. I dislike
space.
Questions:
% Does this plan seem secure and reasonable?
% Will backing up the 0-byte file this way make it easy to guess my
blowfish key?
% Is there software that already does this?
% Can this plan be improved?
% Does anyone offer unlimited space for Unix backups
Is there any possibility of using your own media locally - such as
tape or a large USB attached disk?If security is such a primary
concern, I can't see sending the data to that type of offsite thing.
Get a couple of large USB SATAs and use dump(8) to back the stuff up
on them.Write them
On Sun, 17 May 2009 09:12:57 -0700,
Kelly Jones kelly.terry.jo...@gmail.com said:
K I like this plan because it does versioned backups, and doesn't backup
K identical files twice. I dislike it because I lose Mozy's unlimited disk
K space.
K % Is there software that already does this?
I
my
blowfish key?
% Is there software that already does this?
% Can this plan be improved?
% Does anyone offer unlimited space for Unix backups?
(safesnaps.com)
% Any general thoughts/comments on this plan?
--
We're just a Bunch Of Regular Guys, a collective group that's trying
Kelly Jones wrote:
I tried using Mozy for backups because they offer unlimited space, but
1) they don't support FreeBSD, 2) they encrypt file contents, but NOT
file names, and 3) they don't do true versioned backups. Easy
workaround for 1): rsync to a Mac/Windows and backup from there, but
2)
Hi
I am a newbie to Unix with no experience in installing unix operating
system. Have been through Download Freebsd but not quite sure what I should
download.
What is ISO and Distribution not quite sure which I should download.
Can anyone help me with this.
Regards
Ese
Ese Oronsaye escribió:
Hi
I am a newbie to Unix with no experience in installing unix operating
system. Have been through Download Freebsd but not quite sure what I should
download.
What is ISO and Distribution not quite sure which I should download.
Can anyone help me with this.
Regards
Ese
1 - 100 of 668 matches
Mail list logo
