Re: WITHOUT_MODULES in /etc/make.conf doesn't work

2012-07-05 Thread Thomas Mueller
> No, I'm just borderline sure that WITHOUT_MODULES works > the same way as MODULES_OVERRIDE, that is it looks in > top directory in /usr/src/sys/modules/ and ulpt is in > /usr/src/sys/modules/usb/ulpt > Speaking of RAM savings, things you would always load > should be compiled in kernel, modules

Re: WITHOUT_MODULES in /etc/make.conf doesn't work

2012-07-04 Thread Jakub Lach
> Sort of a dirty trick that you have to use usb/ulpt as > opposed to ulpt, and a deficiency in the documentation. No, I'm just borderline sure that WITHOUT_MODULES works the same way as MODULES_OVERRIDE, that is it looks in top directory in /usr/src/sys/modules/ and ulpt is in /usr/src/sys/modul

Re: WITHOUT_MODULES in /etc/make.conf doesn't work

2012-07-04 Thread Thomas Mueller
from Polytropon : > Yes, /etc/src.conf uses WITHOUT_* on a per-module basis, so you need > to explicitely name the modules not to build. > But you're right, there's only WITHOUT_USB (for not building the > USB-related parts), so going with kernel configuration would be > a good point to start --

Re: WITHOUT_MODULES in /etc/make.conf doesn't work

2012-07-03 Thread Jakub Lach
and consider using MODULES_OVERRIDE if you will precisely know your needs. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/WITHOUT-MODULES-in-etc-make-conf-doesn-t-work-tp5723832p5723883.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: WITHOUT_MODULES in /etc/make.conf doesn't work

2012-07-03 Thread Jakub Lach
Try with: WITHOUT_MODULES= usb/ulpt -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/WITHOUT-MODULES-in-etc-make-conf-doesn-t-work-tp5723832p5723880.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ freeb

Re: WITHOUT_MODULES in /etc/make.conf doesn't work

2012-07-03 Thread Polytropon
On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 04:54:05 -0400, Thomas Mueller wrote: > from Polytropon : > > > On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 22:59:44 -0400, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > > How does one, when building the kernel, prevent building one or more > > > modules? > > > Use the "new" means of /etc/src.conf (see "man src.conf" f

Re: WITHOUT_MODULES in /etc/make.conf doesn't work

2012-07-03 Thread Thomas Mueller
from Polytropon : > On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 22:59:44 -0400, Thomas Mueller wrote: > > How does one, when building the kernel, prevent building one or more > > modules? > Use the "new" means of /etc/src.conf (see "man src.conf" for > details) to prevent the building of modules. I looked through "man

Re: WITHOUT_MODULES in /etc/make.conf doesn't work

2012-07-02 Thread Wojciech Puchar
I think MODULES_OVERRIDE is for building only a few modules instead of a large number of modules? true. definitely works for me. Alternatively, how can I prevent ulpt.ko from automatically loading when I connect a USB printer (HP) that is supposed to work with ugen but not ulpt. devd.con

Re: WITHOUT_MODULES in /etc/make.conf doesn't work

2012-07-02 Thread Polytropon
On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 22:59:44 -0400, Thomas Mueller wrote: > How does one, when building the kernel, prevent building one or more modules? Use the "new" means of /etc/src.conf (see "man src.conf" for details) to prevent the building of modules. > I have > WITHOUT_MODULES= ulpt > in /etc/make.con

WITHOUT_MODULES in /etc/make.conf doesn't work

2012-07-02 Thread Thomas Mueller
How does one, when building the kernel, prevent building one or more modules? I have WITHOUT_MODULES= ulpt in /etc/make.conf but ulpt.ko always appears in /boot/kernel directory. For now, I want to build all modules except for this one, but perhaps I could keep everything in kernel config and no