Re: autoconf failure

2007-10-05 Thread Chad Perrin
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:10:12PM +0200, Mel wrote: > > It's simpler then that: > pkg_delete -f autoconf-2.5[39]* I came to the same conclusion before seeing this email, but figured I'd see if anyone had said something about it. pkg_cutleaves seemed to indicate it was a leave package with no de

Re: autoconf failure

2007-10-05 Thread Mel
On Friday 05 October 2007 11:19:55 Barry Byrne wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chad Perrin > > Sent: 04 October 2007 00:35 > > To: FreeBSD Questions > > Subject: autoconf failure &

RE: autoconf failure

2007-10-05 Thread Barry Byrne
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chad Perrin > Sent: 04 October 2007 00:35 > To: FreeBSD Questions > Subject: autoconf failure > > First, portversion reports as follows: > > # portversion -v

autoconf failure

2007-10-04 Thread Chad Perrin
First, portversion reports as follows: # portversion -v|grep -v = autoconf-2.53_4 < needs updating (port has 2.61_2) autoconf-2.59_3 < needs updating (port has 2.61_2) Then, /usr/ports/UPDATING fails to note anything about the new autoconf version other than the f