Re: FreeBSD make buildworld fail: cc: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1)

2011-11-15 Thread Traiano Welcome
Ok, I've taken the coward's way out and installed a fresh system from CD, upgrading according to the manual's best practice recommended method :-) I've kept the VM images of the failed upgrade system, when I have some time I'll dig a bit further for the actual reason make buildworld failed.

Re: FreeBSD make buildworld fail: cc: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1)

2011-11-14 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 11/11/11 11:43 AM, Traiano Welcome wrote: Most recent suggestions from Damien Fleuriot: [root@snmp-proxy02 /usr/src]# cat /etc/make.conf SUP_UPDATE= yes SUP=/usr/bin/csup SUPFLAGS= -zgL 2 SUPHOST=cvsup2.za.freebsd.org SUPFILE=

Re: FreeBSD make buildworld fail: cc: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1)

2011-11-14 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 11/11/11 11:53 AM, Polytropon wrote: On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:45:15 +, Traiano Welcome wrote: And I don't seem to have a src.conf anywhere on my filesystem ... Hmmm. You'll have to create it yourself (just like /etc/make.conf). See man src.conf for details. I can't see any odd

Re: FreeBSD make buildworld fail: cc: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1)

2011-11-14 Thread Traiano Welcome
On 2011/11/14 11:25 AM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote: On 11/11/11 11:53 AM, Polytropon wrote: On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:45:15 +, Traiano Welcome wrote: And I don't seem to have a src.conf anywhere on my filesystem ... Hmmm. You'll have to create it yourself (just like

Re: FreeBSD make buildworld fail: cc: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1)

2011-11-13 Thread Frank Shute
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:51:29AM +, Traiano Welcome wrote: Another question worth asking: how much memory/swap does the machine have? If FreeBSD runs short of memory, it will start killing processes. Hi Frank As follows: Mem: 96M Active, 286M Inact, 224M Wired, 213M Buf, 1368M

Re: FreeBSD make buildworld fail: cc: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1)

2011-11-11 Thread Traiano Welcome
Hi Damien /etc/make.conf as follows (with your recently suggested changes added): SUP_UPDATE= yes SUP=/usr/bin/csup SUPFLAGS= -zgL 2 SUPHOST=cvsup2.za.freebsd.org SUPFILE=/etc/cvsup/stable-supfile PORTSSUPFILE= /etc/cvsup/ports-supfile DOCSUPFILE=

FreeBSD make buildworld fail: cc: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1)

2011-11-10 Thread Traiano Welcome
Hi All I'm trying to upgrade from FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0 to FreeBSD 8.2 or better. My upgrade sequence would be as follows: 0. cd /usr/src/;make cleanworld (and in extreme cases rm -rf /usr/src/* and rm -rf /usr/obj) 1. csup -L 2 stable supfile. 2. cd /usr/src; make buildworld make

Re: FreeBSD make buildworld fail: cc: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1)

2011-11-10 Thread Denise H. G.
On 2011/11/10 at 18:05, Traiano Welcome traiano.welc...@mtnbusiness.co.za wrote: Hi All I'm trying to upgrade from FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0 to FreeBSD 8.2 or better. My upgrade sequence would be as follows: 0. cd /usr/src/;make cleanworld (and in extreme cases rm -rf /usr/src/* and rm

Re: FreeBSD make buildworld fail: cc: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1)

2011-11-10 Thread Traiano Welcome
Hi Thanks for the feedback. On 2011/11/10 1:28 PM, Denise H. G. darc...@gmail.com wrote: On 2011/11/10 at 18:05, Traiano Welcome traiano.welc...@mtnbusiness.co.za wrote: Hi All I'm trying to upgrade from FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0 to FreeBSD 8.2 or better. My upgrade sequence would be as

Re: FreeBSD make buildworld fail: cc: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1)

2011-11-10 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 11/10/11 11:05 AM, Traiano Welcome wrote: Hi All I'm trying to upgrade from FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0 to FreeBSD 8.2 or better. My upgrade sequence would be as follows: 0. cd /usr/src/;make cleanworld (and in extreme cases rm -rf /usr/src/* and rm -rf /usr/obj) 1. csup -L 2 stable

Re: FreeBSD make buildworld fail: cc: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1)

2011-11-10 Thread Johan Hendriks
Damien Fleuriot schreef: Here are mine: SUP_UPDATE= yes SUP=/usr/bin/csup SUPFLAGS= -zgL 2 SUPHOST=cvsup1.fr.freebsd.org SUPFILE=/etc/cvsup/stable-supfile PORTSSUPFILE= /etc/cvsup/ports-supfile DOCSUPFILE= /etc/cvsup/doc-supfile There is no -g anymore

Re: FreeBSD make buildworld fail: cc: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1)

2011-11-10 Thread Denise H. G.
On 2011/11/10 at 20:56, Traiano Welcome traiano.welc...@mtnbusiness.co.za wrote: Hi Thanks for the feedback. I'd be happy to try this sequence, however I don't make it past make buildworld. (of note, the sequence I used above works on all my other boxen though) I've just

Re: FreeBSD make buildworld fail: cc: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1)

2011-11-10 Thread Frank Shute
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:05:27AM +, Traiano Welcome wrote: Hi All I'm trying to upgrade from FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0 to FreeBSD 8.2 or better. My upgrade sequence would be as follows: 0. cd /usr/src/;make cleanworld (and in extreme cases rm -rf /usr/src/* and rm -rf /usr/obj) 1.

Re: FreeBSD make buildworld fail: cc: Internal error: Killed: 9 (program cc1)

2011-11-10 Thread Frank Shute
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:05:27AM +, Traiano Welcome wrote: [snip] cc -O2 -pipe -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DPREFIX=\/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr\ -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../cc_tools -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_int/../cc_tools

Buildworld fail

2011-03-08 Thread Erik Norgaard
Hi: I'm trying to upgrade to 8.2, just updated source, cleaned up any leftovers from previous build, but make buildworld fails. I have, alpha# uname -a FreeBSD alpha 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0: Sat Oct 2 20:34:13 CEST 2010 root@alpha:/usr/local/obj/usr/local/src/sys/GENERIC i386

Re: Buildworld fail

2011-03-08 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 3/8/11 11:40 AM, Erik Norgaard wrote: Hi: I'm trying to upgrade to 8.2, just updated source, cleaned up any leftovers from previous build, but make buildworld fails. I have, alpha# uname -a FreeBSD alpha 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0: Sat Oct 2 20:34:13 CEST 2010

Re: Buildworld fail

2011-03-08 Thread Erik Norgaard
On 08/03/2011 12:21, Damien Fleuriot wrote: Contents of your make.conf ? You never know... LOADER_TFTP_SUPPORT= YES #SUP_UPDATE= #SUP=/usr/bin/csup #SUPFLAGS= -g -L 2 SUPHOST=cvsup.uk.FreeBSD.org SUPFILE=/usr/local/src/standard-supfile PORTSSUPFILE=

Re: Buildworld fail

2011-03-08 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 3/8/11 12:28 PM, Erik Norgaard wrote: On 08/03/2011 12:21, Damien Fleuriot wrote: Contents of your make.conf ? You never know... LOADER_TFTP_SUPPORT= YES #SUP_UPDATE= #SUP=/usr/bin/csup #SUPFLAGS= -g -L 2 SUPHOST=cvsup.uk.FreeBSD.org SUPFILE=

Re: Buildworld fail

2011-03-08 Thread Erik Norgaard
On 08/03/2011 12:22, Robert Bonomi wrote: Something -- just what is unknown -- triggered an *INTERNAL*COMPILER*ERROR* doing a 'makedep'. Dig through the mailing-list archives for the last week or two. There was another report of the compiler choking. As I recall, there was a follow- up to

Re: Buildworld fail

2011-03-08 Thread Erik Norgaard
On 08/03/2011 12:49, Damien Fleuriot wrote: Can you try with the release tag RELENG_8_2 ? I just nuked src and obj and did a fresh checkout of RELENG_8_2, but the problem persist :( -- stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility

Re: Buildworld fail

2011-03-08 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 3/8/11 12:54 PM, Erik Norgaard wrote: On 08/03/2011 12:49, Damien Fleuriot wrote: Can you try with the release tag RELENG_8_2 ? I just nuked src and obj and did a fresh checkout of RELENG_8_2, but the problem persist :( --

Re: Buildworld fail

2011-03-08 Thread Greg Larkin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 3/8/11 8:59 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: On 3/8/11 12:54 PM, Erik Norgaard wrote: On 08/03/2011 12:49, Damien Fleuriot wrote: Can you try with the release tag RELENG_8_2 ? I just nuked src and obj and did a fresh checkout of RELENG_8_2, but

Re: Buildworld fail

2011-03-08 Thread Erik Norgaard
On 08/03/2011 15:52, Greg Larkin wrote: A segfault might be indicative of hardware problems, you may want to check your ram chips ? Reference: http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/ Hi, thanks. Did a clean up again, reboot, fsck, reboot again and now it's building. Probably time for an upgrade,

Re: Buildworld fail

2011-03-08 Thread Michael J. Kearney
Would anyone agree that it us possible the hardware console... logging in from a remote terminal has corrected my own segfaults on substandard hardware... Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote: On 3/8/11 11:40 AM, Erik Norgaard wrote: Hi: I'm trying to upgrade to 8.2, just updated source,

Re: Buildworld fail

2011-03-08 Thread Erik Norgaard
On 08/03/2011 21:16, Michael J. Kearney wrote: Would anyone agree that it us possible the hardware console... logging in from a remote terminal has corrected my own segfaults on substandard hardware... Depends on the hardware I guess. I am building everything remotely. I do know however

RE: Make buildworld fail due to sendmail/sasl installation.

2006-10-09 Thread Jesse Geddis
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jesse Geddis Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 4:36 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Make buildworld fail due to sendmail/sasl installation. Ever since I installed the package sendmail+tls+sasl2-8.13.8 I haven't been able to make

Make buildworld fail due to sendmail/sasl installation.

2006-10-08 Thread Jesse Geddis
Ever since I installed the package sendmail+tls+sasl2-8.13.8 I haven't been able to make buildworld on my system. I get file not found errors for some sasl header files. I'll attach the pertinent portion of the failure below. Seems simple enough, however, I haven't been able to get around

Re: buildworld fail

2002-12-07 Thread John Mills
Kent, all - On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Kent Stewart wrote: Just remember that a signal 11 in a compile is usually your hardware telling you something is wrong. If it dies at the same spot, it can be options or whatever. If you use strange options, you have to try them first but still remember a

Re: buildworld fail

2002-12-07 Thread Kent Stewart
On Saturday 07 December 2002 05:40 am, John Mills wrote: Kent, all - On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Kent Stewart wrote: Just remember that a signal 11 in a compile is usually your hardware telling you something is wrong. If it dies at the same spot, it can be options or whatever. If you use strange

buildworld fail

2002-12-06 Thread Steve Bertrand
Hi all, I have spent a couple weeks in groups, google, handbook and lists for self-help on this. I am trying to buildworld on a 4.6.2 machine to RELENG_4. The cvsup is updating all src and ports and finished successfully. I reboot to kern.securelevel=-1, #rm -rvf /usr/obj and #cd /usr/src

Re: buildworld fail

2002-12-06 Thread Kent Stewart
On Friday 06 December 2002 01:02 pm, Steve Bertrand wrote: Hi all, I have spent a couple weeks in groups, google, handbook and lists for self-help on this. I am trying to buildworld on a 4.6.2 machine to RELENG_4. The cvsup is updating all src and ports and finished successfully. I reboot

Re: buildworld fail

2002-12-06 Thread Steve Bertrand
Kent: I see the differences between the compiler commands, but have no idea how to change them. I would like to try your idea. I have given no special flags to make. What flags would I give to make when making world? Tks, Kent Stewart wrote: On Friday 06 December 2002 01:02 pm, Steve

Re: buildworld fail

2002-12-06 Thread Kent Stewart
On Friday 06 December 2002 01:38 pm, Steve Bertrand wrote: Kent: I see the differences between the compiler commands, but have no idea how to change them. I would like to try your idea. I have given no special flags to make. What flags would I give to make when making world? #CFLAGS= -O

Re: buildworld fail

2002-12-06 Thread John Mills
Steve - On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Steve Bertrand wrote: I have spent a couple weeks in groups, google, handbook and lists for self-help on this. I am trying to buildworld on a 4.6.2 machine to RELENG_4. The cvsup is updating all src and ports and finished successfully. I reboot to

Re: buildworld fail

2002-12-06 Thread John Mills
Kent - On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Kent Stewart wrote: On Friday 06 December 2002 01:38 pm, Steve Bertrand wrote: Kent: I see the differences between the compiler commands, but have no idea how to change them. I would like to try your idea. I have given no special flags to make. What flags

Re: buildworld fail

2002-12-06 Thread Kenzo
: buildworld fail Kent - On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Kent Stewart wrote: On Friday 06 December 2002 01:38 pm, Steve Bertrand wrote: Kent: I see the differences between the compiler commands, but have no idea how to change them. I would like to try your idea. I have given no special

Re: buildworld fail

2002-12-06 Thread Kent Stewart
On Friday 06 December 2002 02:03 pm, John Mills wrote: Kent - On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Kent Stewart wrote: On Friday 06 December 2002 01:38 pm, Steve Bertrand wrote: Kent: I see the differences between the compiler commands, but have no idea how to change them. I would like to try