I first noticed the problem when the machine stopped sending local mail;
a typical entry:
Aug 19 10:08:30 online sm-msp-queue[68533]: o7IKAhth008649:
to=timot...@xxx.njit.edu, ctladdr=timothyk (1001/1001), delay=17:57:47,
xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=3360050, relay=[127.0.0.1],
On 8/19/10 10:21 AM, Tim Kellers wrote:
When I ping localhost:
# ping localhost
PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address
Hi,
Is the loopback interface (lo0) up?
Regards,
--
Glen Barber
___
On 19/08/2010 15:21, Tim Kellers wrote:
I'm eagerly open to suggestions.
What does 'ifconfig lo0' say?
What does 'sockstat | grep :25' say?
What does 'ls -la /usr/libexec/sendmail/' say?
What does 'mount | grep /usr' say?
It sounds as if either:
* Your loopback interface has lost
On 08/19/10 10:55, Glen Barber wrote:
On 8/19/10 10:21 AM, Tim Kellers wrote:
When I ping localhost:
# ping localhost
PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address
Hi,
Is the loopback interface (lo0) up?
Regards,
lo0:
On 08/19/10 11:02, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 19/08/2010 15:21, Tim Kellers wrote:
I'm eagerly open to suggestions.
What does 'ifconfig lo0' say?
What does 'sockstat | grep :25' say?
What does 'ls -la /usr/libexec/sendmail/' say?
What does 'mount | grep /usr' say?
It sounds as if
On 08/19/10 11:51, mikel king wrote:
Your lo0 only has inet6 addresses, perhaps try binding a v4 address?
Cheers,
m!
On Aug 19, 2010, at 11:12, Tim Kellerskell...@njit.edu wrote:
On 08/19/10 11:02, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 19/08/2010 15:21, Tim Kellers wrote:
I'm
Your lo0 only has inet6 addresses, perhaps try binding a v4 address?
Cheers,
m!
On Aug 19, 2010, at 11:12, Tim Kellers kell...@njit.edu wrote:
On 08/19/10 11:02, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 19/08/2010 15:21, Tim Kellers wrote:
I'm eagerly open to suggestions.
What does 'ifconfig
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 02:47:35AM +, Anton Shterenlikht typed:
I believe -current has a issue where you can not ping localhost atm
all my machines are current, but some are more current than others..
Why exactly are you running -current? People that do are supposed to do some
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Mar 10 20:24:31 2010
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:23:44 +
From: Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: can't ping localhost
I misconfigured my system somehow,
so now I can't ping localhost:
# ping
I misconfigured my system somehow,
so now I can't ping localhost:
# ping localhost
PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: No route to host
ping: sendto: No route to host
^C
# cat /etc/hosts
# $FreeBSD: head/etc/hosts 109997 2003-01-28 21:29:23Z dbaker $
#
::1
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
I misconfigured my system somehow,
so now I can't ping localhost:
# ping localhost
PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: No route to host
ping: sendto: No route to host
^C
# cat /etc/hosts
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
I misconfigured my system somehow,
so now I can't ping localhost:
# ping localhost
PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: No route to host
ping: sendto: No route to host
^C
what is the output
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
I misconfigured my system somehow,
so now I can't ping localhost:
# ping localhost
PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: No route to host
ping: sendto: No route to host
^C
# cat /etc/hosts
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 08:34:08PM -0600, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk
wrote:
I misconfigured my system somehow,
so now I can't ping localhost:
# ping localhost
PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. sfour...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk
wrote:
I misconfigured my system somehow,
so now I can't ping localhost:
# ping localhost
PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
ping
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.ukwrote:
# uname -a
FreeBSD mech-anton240.men.bris.ac.uk 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #2:
Tue Mar 9 14:35:40 GMT 2010
me...@mech-anton240.men.bris.ac.uk:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/QOF
sparc64
I believe -current has
Well, the ping issue is just an example.
My real problem is that sendmail can't send
anything locally:
# tail /var/log/maillog
Mar 11 02:16:58 mech-anton240 sm-msp-queue[32611]: o2B0irgd029426: to=mexas,
ctladdr=mexas (1001/1001), delay=01:32:05, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay,
pri=480031,
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:00:01PM -0500, Jon Radel wrote:
Well, the ping issue is just an example.
My real problem is that sendmail can't send
anything locally:
# tail /var/log/maillog
Mar 11 02:16:58 mech-anton240 sm-msp-queue[32611]: o2B0irgd029426:
to=mexas, ctladdr=mexas
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 08:58:12PM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Anton Shterenlikht
me...@bristol.ac.ukwrote:
# uname -a
FreeBSD mech-anton240.men.bris.ac.uk 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #2:
Tue Mar 9 14:35:40 GMT 2010
Rem P Roberti wrote:
Can someone tell what is going on here. All of a sudden I can't ping.
When I try a get this message:
ping: sendto: Permission denied
All internet functions seem to be working fine...just can't ping.
Rem
___
freebsd-questions
Can someone tell what is going on here. All of a sudden I can't ping.
When I try a get this message:
ping: sendto: Permission denied
All internet functions seem to be working fine...just can't ping.
Rem
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
check your firewall rules
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Rem P Roberti wrote:
Can someone tell what is going on here. All of a sudden I can't ping.
When I try a get this message:
ping: sendto: Permission denied
All internet functions seem to be working fine...just can't ping.
Rem
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rem P Roberti wrote:
Can someone tell what is going on here. All of a sudden I can't ping.
When I try a get this message:
ping: sendto: Permission denied
All internet functions seem to be working fine...just can't ping.
Firewall blocking ICMP protocol.
HTH
Rem P Roberti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
ping: sendto: Permission denied
Did you (or another admin) change firewall rules? Also, please do a simple
google or list archive search before posting to the list. Searching for the
error you paste above results in several links that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
check your firewall rules
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Rem P Roberti wrote:
Can someone tell what is going on here. All of a sudden I can't ping.
When I try a get this message:
ping: sendto: Permission denied
All internet
After upgrading a -CURRENT box from the April 19 version to one
from yesterday, ping on that box seems to be broken. (I noticed the
behavior today; I don't know whether it's directly related to the
upgrade or not.)
Specifically:
huff@ netstat -rn -f inet
Routing tables
I configure ed0 when I install FreeBSD7.0,like follows:
Host:test.example.com
Domain:test.com
IPv4 GateWay: 172.18.0.1
Name server: 172.18.0.250
IPv4 Address: 172.18.0.19
Netmask:255.255.255.0
Then I Ping itself,like follows:
#ping 172.18.0.19
Then result is failure:
ping: sendto: No
Hello!
I configure ed0 when I install FreeBSD7.0,like follows:
Host:test.example.com
Domain:test.com
IPv4 GateWay: 172.18.0.1
Name server: 172.18.0.250
IPv4 Address: 172.18.0.19
Netmask:255.255.255.0
I noticed you are using ed0 as the interface?
There is no ed in FreeBSD.
Then I Ping
This is your interface - le0.
Additonally do not forget to run /etc/netstart
options=8 VLAN_MTU
either 00:0d:18:23:32:7a
inet6 fe80::20c:29ff:fe76:365a%le0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 255.255.255.255
It shows that your le0 interface has not
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:10:25 -0400, Chris Haulmark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no ed in FreeBSD.
Off topic, but there is:
% man 4 ed
ed -- NE-2000 and WD-80x3 Ethernet driver
Older NIC, but still present, works for RealTek RTL-8029,
for example.
--
Polytropon
From
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 04:01:27PM +0800, EdwardKing wrote:
I configure ed0 when I install FreeBSD7.0,like follows:
Host:test.example.com
Domain:test.com
IPv4 GateWay: 172.18.0.1
Name server: 172.18.0.250
IPv4 Address: 172.18.0.19
Netmask:255.255.255.0
Then I Ping itself,like
On my gateway I configured a tunnel device (tun0) and connected it with a
remote host using OpenSSH. Ifconfig looks as follows:tun0:
flags=8051UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST mtu 1500inet 10.254.254.1
-- 10.254.254.2 netmask 0xff00 Opened by PID 4619I can ping or
connect
P.U.Kruppa wrote:
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Laurence Sanford wrote:
Anyone got any ideas on this?
[EMAIL PROTECTED](~)$ ping 127.0.0.1
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address
ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address
ping:
Laurence Sanford wrote:
Anyone got any ideas on this?
[EMAIL PROTECTED](~)$ ping 127.0.0.1
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address
ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address
ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address
ping: sendto: Can't assign
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Laurence Sanford wrote:
Anyone got any ideas on this?
[EMAIL PROTECTED](~)$ ping 127.0.0.1
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address
ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address
ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address
ping:
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Laurence Sanford wrote:
Anyone got any ideas on this?
[EMAIL PROTECTED](~)$ ping 127.0.0.1
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address
ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address
ping: sendto: Can't assign
Anyone got any ideas on this?
[EMAIL PROTECTED](~)$ ping 127.0.0.1
PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address
ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address
ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address
ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address
ping:
At the startup of my FreeBSD 5.3 (mini-install), i've got two mess
about NAT:
Warning: enable NAT: Invalid command
Warning: enable nat: Failed 1
after, i've got the mess fxp0: device timeout
TIA
koub. :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
IPFW is initialized without any setup in the rc.conf file??? I
was used the mini-install... it's automaticaly enable after
installation??
TIA Mrachik.
koub.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hello,
I was setup the Win2K as client on the 192.168.3.2 ip adress (netmask
255.255.255.0), with a passerel on the FreeBSD (5.3R MINI-INSTALL) and
the
ip adress is 192.168.3.1. the Win2K computer name is windaube and
the
FreeBSD computer name is skoub.
you can look bottom for
Please, someone can help me?
May be trouble in ipfw?
Mrachik
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is not running, all the machines can ping each other.
If FreeBSD2 runs NAT, ping still works, except FreeBSD2 can't ping Router1
(192.168.0.1) and FreeBSD1 (192.168.0.254). FreeBSD2 can ping to the interent fine.
The Windows 2000 machines gets it's IP from DHCP running on FreeBSD2. For a day,
FreeBSD
Hello all, here is what I have going on
INET-1-3-4
\
\
-2
Boxes
1 (216.138.226.17) = Main Firewall/Gateway (FBSD5.1)
2 (192.168.1.5) = LAN PC (WinSrv2K3)
3 (216.138.226.25) = Development
I'm fairly new with FreeBSD and am having one of the most frustrating
problems I've ever had setting up a machine.
Ran a fairly basic install. I can use Mozilla on the internet okay. Have
sshd going.
I can't get into the machine from the OS X box sitting right next to it on
my desk.
I've
On Sun, 12 Oct 2003, Heath Volmer wrote:
I'm fairly new with FreeBSD and am having one of the most frustrating
problems I've ever had setting up a machine.
Ran a fairly basic install. I can use Mozilla on the internet okay. Have
sshd going.
I can't get into the machine from the OS X box
I've acquired DSL. I didn't like the modem's NAT and PPPoE, so I
switched it to bridged Ethernet and am using ppp(8) for that. I'm using
ipfw2 for QOS things (pipes and queues). I'm using ipf for firewalling
and ftp proxying.
Almost everything works well, except (so far) active FTP and pinging
46 matches
Mail list logo
